In the future, it will be possible for Swift Package Manager to be enabled on one but not all platforms (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151567#issuecomment-2455941279).
This updates the `.flutter-plugin-dependencies` file format to separate iOS's and macOS's SwiftPM enablement. For now, these platforms will always have the same value.
This `.flutter-plugin-dependencies` file is read by our CocoaPods scripts to determine whether we should use CocoaPods or not to inject plugins.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151567
Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/157359
Prevents Flutter.xcframework.dSYM from being copied into the App.framework folder. I am not 100% positive if there are cases where it's valid to have multiple dSYMs in that folder, so I'm just string matching and filtering out `Flutter.xcframework.dSYM`
Reverts: flutter/flutter#154061
Initiated by: QuncCccccc
Reason for reverting: might be the reason that cause Framework tree to red
Original PR Author: bartekpacia
Reviewed By: {gmackall, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR resolves#151166
Allows applying of `include_flutter.groovy` via the `apply from:` syntax, which allows using a host app that is using the Gradle Kotlin DSL (the default these days when creating an Android app in AS).
Explanation: The `include_flutter.groovy` script is currently not able to be called by Kotlin gradle files, because it is [intended to be invoked with the following lines](https://docs.flutter.dev/add-to-app/android/project-setup#depend-on-the-modules-source-code):
```
setBinding(new Binding([gradle: this])) // new
evaluate(new File( // new
settingsDir.parentFile, // new
'flutter_module/.android/include_flutter.groovy' // new
))
```
`setBinding` isn't part of the Kotlin gradle DSL, and there isn't (that I can find) an easy Kotlin equivalent. If this binding isn't set, the reference to `gradle` in `include_flutter.groovy` is wrong, which breaks the script.
This PR modifies `include_flutter.groovy` to also support being invoked through the standard way of invoking a script via the Gradle Groovy/Kotlin DSLs, which is `apply from:` (or it's slightly different Kotlin syntax). The start of the script identifies which of the two approaches is being used by checking if the binding is set, and then initializes some variables differently depending on the case.
If we land this, I believe we should update the example Gradle files for both the `kts` and `groovy` cases to prefer the `apply from` syntax as I think this is the syntax most developers would be more familiar with already seeing in their Gradle files.
This test waits on the application to print a message before
continuting, but that message does not reach the test post UI/platform
thread merge.
The test otherwise seems to function fine, and the app isn't crashing.
This PR addresses an issue where the `--target-platform` flag was not being respected when building APKs in debug mode. Previously, debug builds would always include `x86` and `x64` architectures, regardless of the specified target platform. This change ensures that the `--target-platform` flag is honored across all build modes, including debug.
To achieve this, `BuildApkCommand` has been slightly changed to become responsible for list of archs that should be built in the current run,rather than just parsing arguments. Previously, this responsibility was distributed to gradle, which could be frustrating (in my opinion)
Fixes#153359
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/151675 bumped module templates to AGP 8.1.
In doing so, I tried to work around a behavior change [that was new in AGP 8.0](https://developer.android.com/build/releases/past-releases/agp-8-0-0-release-notes):
> AGP 8.0 creates no SoftwareComponent by default. Instead AGP creates SoftwareComponents only for variants that are configured to be published using the publishing DSL.
by using AGP's publishing DSL to define which variants to publish in the module's ephemeral gradle files:
```
android.buildTypes.all {buildType ->
if (!android.productFlavors.isEmpty()) {
android.productFlavors.all{productFlavor ->
android.publishing.singleVariant(productFlavor.name + buildType.name.capitalize()) {
withSourcesJar()
withJavadocJar()
}
}
} else {
android.publishing.singleVariant(buildType.name) {
withSourcesJar()
withJavadocJar()
}
}
}
```
The problem is that this doesn't get applied to the plugin projects used by the module, so if a module uses any plugin it breaks. This PR fixes that by applying similar logic, but to each project (not just the module's project).
Tested manually with https://github.com/gmackall/GrayAddToApp, and also re-enabled an old test that tested this use case as a part of the PR.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/154371
Reverts: flutter/flutter#152487
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: I forgot that I need to override the compileSdkVersion in the AGP 8.0 [instance of this test](ef9cd32f5a/dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/android_java17_dependency_smoke_tests.dart (L19))
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
This test expects to run on 32-bit hardware, but the devicelab no longer
has 32-bit Android hardware. In particular, the test contains hand-coded
32-bit arm assembly for reading the stack pointer from Dart code via
`dart:ffi`.
This test was added in response to a framework change that caused stack
frames to be larger than expected while building widgets, leading apps
to crash with StackOverflow exceptions unexpectedly. Since then (>3
years ago) this test has not prevented any similar issue, so I believe
deleting it rather than fixing it is a better use of resources.
Sets up tests that verify we can build a fresh counter app across our Gradle/AGP/Kotlin support range.
Post submit only, because the suite takes ~30 minutes to run, and I expect it to be _somewhat_ rare that we break only one of these versions (and therefore it doesn't get caught by existing presubmits).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#152049
Initiated by: cbracken
Reason for reverting: iOS builds failing in post-submit
Original PR Author: loic-sharma
Reviewed By: {jmagman}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Changes:
1. Enables Swift Package Manager by default on the main/master channel
2. Fixes tests that fail if Swift Package Manager is enabled
Corresponding docs change: https://github.com/flutter/website/pull/10938
Addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151567
This is a very common usage of ad so we want to make sure it's performant.
From the video, it scrolls quite smoothly, but we want to see the numbers, and keep monitoring it in case of regression.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/41930132/c7811c15-ac07-4989-a8a9-3c128e08cbe0
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150230
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
PR to pave the way for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53001 to re-land
Summary:
- Enforces use of Kotlin >= `1.7.0` (please see below note)
- Fixes ci failures that prevented the above PR from landing.
Details:
Because it landed initially, we are able to fake the roll in this PR to fix all the tests ([see my comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149204#discussion_r1617924772)).
Fixes all the tests that failed:
1. `module_test` failing on multiple platforms (3/9 of the failures).
Failure is
```
> Android resource linking failed
ERROR:/b/s/w/ir/x/t/flutter_module_test.KECMXW/hello/.android/plugins_build_output/device_info/intermediates/merged_res/release/values/values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.
```
This is a rather unhelpful error message but some [folks online suggest](https://stackoverflow.com/a/69050529) that upgrading your `compileSdk` version fixes this.
These resolve when I remove the dependency on the long discontinued [package_info](https://pub.dev/packages/package_info) and [device_info](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info) packages, perhaps because they are transitively pulling in low `compileSdk` versions? This is unclear to me.
2. `module_custom_host_app_name_test` was failing for the same reason (another 3/9, or cumulative 6/9).
3. `tool_integration_tests_3_4` was a flake ð (7/9)
4. `framework_tests_slow` needed a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin (the flutter tool tells us this, so I just upgraded as suggested) and it resolved (8/9)
5.`android_preview_tool_integration_tests` needed newer AGP and KGP versions. I also refactored the tests, and bumped our error versions, fixing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142653.
**Note that the bump to KGP is not in line with our policy** - we didn't warn for `1.5.0-1.6.x` for a release (or at all) before dropping support. But I think it might still be justified:
- The bump to our androidx libraries unblocks ongoing Scribe work, and also includes a fix for a [memory leak](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129307#issuecomment-1601636959) and a [crash on folding phones](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/114868#issuecomment-2133226962), among many other bug fixes.
- Gradle [doesn't test on half of that range](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#kotlin), and so we implicitly can't claim to support it either. More generally, our Java and Kotlin support ranges should probably strictly fall within what Gradle tests.
Initial tap is missing sometimes; either its never delivered or it is
delivered before gesture controller is hooked up.
1: Update MemoryTest to have option `requiresTapToStart` guarding the
new paths
2: Update the two perf tests that appear to be flaky to output when
TAPPED is received
3: Update the MemoryTest to keep tapping while waiting for TAPPED
Tested on devicelab:
* setting iterations=1
* removing the timeout before READY
* running tests in a while loop
Before this change, you could get the test to hang often. After this
change you'll see "tapping device... [x]" where x is the counter.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150096
Reverts: flutter/flutter#146931
Initiated by: Hixie
Reason for reverting: more failures
Original PR Author: Hixie
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Fixes#137555.
This is an updated version of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146856, which was reverted in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146927. The first commit is identical to the original PR, and subsequent commits are the fixes to address failures detected in devicelab post-commit.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#145224
Initiated by: hellohuanlin
Reason for reverting: breaks the tree
Original PR Author: hellohuanlin
Reviewed By: {gmackall, jmagman}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144745, which got reverted due to Android lockfile. Fixed by `dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart`
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143534
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143257
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
This pull request fixes#143803 by taking advantage of Dart's null-aware operators.
And unlike `switch` expressions ([9 PRs](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143634) and counting), the Flutter codebase is already fantastic when it comes to null-aware coding. After refactoring the entire repo, all the changes involving `?.` and `??` can fit into a single pull request.
