This reverts commit 7cdc23b3e1.
The failure in the `native_assets_test` integration test on Windows was caused by the DevTools process not being shutdown by the `ColdRunner` when running the profile mode portion of the test. This resulted in the test being unable to clean up the project created by the test as DevTools was still holding onto a handle within the directory. This PR adds back the mistakenly removed DevTools shutdown logic in the `ColdRunner`.
Turns out just supporting the right value for `kDebugMode` was a lot simpler than I thought. Debug builds used to never go through the build system code path when using `flutter run`, but now that we have wasm this can occur with the run command.
This should address https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148850
Updates the expected steps in the async function defined within `stepping_project.dart`.
The Dart web team is updating the async semantics of DDC to bring them in line with the other backends. Currently, the DDC async semantics don't adhere to the Dart spec and this can lead to inconsistent and surprising results.
However, the step-over operation doesn't work well yet with the new DDC async semantics. In the long run we intend to improve this but until then the debug stepper will have sporadic results that we can't model well with this test. When we are able to fix the stepper functionality, we will return this test to cover more of the async function being stepped over.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#152049
Initiated by: cbracken
Reason for reverting: iOS builds failing in post-submit
Original PR Author: loic-sharma
Reviewed By: {jmagman}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Changes:
1. Enables Swift Package Manager by default on the main/master channel
2. Fixes tests that fail if Swift Package Manager is enabled
Corresponding docs change: https://github.com/flutter/website/pull/10938
Addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151567
When the `"${native_assets_path}"*.framework` glob doesn't resolve anything, the bash will run the loop once with the original unglobbed value: `/path/to/native/assets/*.framework`. Skip this case to prevent the build from failing when there are no frameworks to sign.
To reproduce this build failure:
1. Enable native assets in the Flutter tool: `flutter config --enable-native-assets`
2. Create a Flutter project with the default template: `flutter create test_native_assets`
3. Add a build hook that does nothing (`hook/build.dart`).
4. Try to build/run the app: `flutter run --debug -d macos`
1. Instead of getting the `FULL_PRODUCT_NAME` Xcode build setting (`Runner.app`) instead use `PRODUCT_NAME` since most places really want the product name, and the extension stripping wasn't correct when the name contained periods.
2. Don't instruct the user to open the `xcarchive` in Xcode if it doesn't exist.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140212
For the necessary background knowledge, see the flutter.dev content on [Resolution-aware image assets](https://docs.flutter.dev/ui/assets/assets-and-images#resolution-aware) and [Conditional bundling of assets based on app flavor](https://docs.flutter.dev/ui/assets/assets-and-images#conditional-bundling-of-assets-based-on-app-flavor) if you don't have a basic understanding of these features.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151813 by using unique temporary directories, per asset file, for transformations. Currently, only a single directory is used and the name of the temporary files was based only on the basename of files. This means that `assets/image.png` and `assets/2x/image.png` would share an output path (`<temp dir path>/image.png`), causing a race. If this quick and rough explanation is a bit confusing, the original issueâ#151813âprovides a full repro and correct identification of the exact cause of the failure that can occur in the asset transformation process.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#146593
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Consistently failing `Windows_android native_assets_android` as in https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_android%20native_assets_android/2533/overview
Original PR Author: bkonyi
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, kenzieschmoll}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This change is a major step towards moving away from shipping DDS via Pub.
The first component of this PR is the move away from importing package:dds to launch DDS. Instead, DDS is launched out of process using the `dart development-service` command shipped with the Dart SDK. This makes Flutter's handling of DDS consistent with the standalone Dart VM.
The second component of this PR is the initial work to prepare for the removal of instances of DevTools being served manually by the flutter_tool, instead relying on DDS to serve DevTools. This will be consistent with how the standalone Dart VM serves DevTools, tying the DevTools lifecycle to a live DDS instance. This will allow for the removal of much of the logic needed to properly manage the lifecycle of the DevTools server in a future PR. Also, by serving DevTools from DDS, users will no longer need to forward a secondary port in remote workflows as DevTools will be available on the DDS port.
There's two remaining circumstances that will prevent us from removing DevtoolsRunner completely:
- The daemon's `devtools.serve` endpoint
- `flutter drive`'s `--profile-memory` flag used for recording memory profiles
This PR also includes some refactoring around `DebuggingOptions` to reduce the number of debugging related arguments being passed as parameters adjacent to a `DebuggingOptions` instance.
This change is a major step towards moving away from shipping DDS via
Pub.
The first component of this PR is the move away from importing
package:dds to launch DDS. Instead, DDS is launched out of process using
the `dart development-service` command shipped with the Dart SDK. This
makes Flutter's handling of DDS consistent with the standalone Dart VM.
The second component of this PR is the initial work to prepare for the
removal of instances of DevTools being served manually by the
flutter_tool, instead relying on DDS to serve DevTools. This will be
consistent with how the standalone Dart VM serves DevTools, tying the
DevTools lifecycle to a live DDS instance. This will allow for the
removal of much of the logic needed to properly manage the lifecycle of
the DevTools server in a future PR. Also, by serving DevTools from DDS,
users will no longer need to forward a secondary port in remote
workflows as DevTools will be available on the DDS port. This code is currently
commented out and will be enabled in a future PR.
There's two remaining circumstances that will prevent us from removing
DevtoolsRunner completely:
- The daemon's `devtools.serve` endpoint
- `flutter drive`'s `--profile-memory` flag used for recording memory
profiles
This PR also includes some refactoring around `DebuggingOptions` to
reduce the number of debugging related arguments being passed as
parameters adjacent to a `DebuggingOptions` instance.
This will make
* `flutter run` have source maps enabled by default
* `flutter build` have source maps disabled by default
which mirrors what happens already today with the js compilers.
For local development this works quite well - even better than with
dart2js (see dart2js issues in [0]).
We do have some follow-up items for source maps in dart2wasm compiler,
see [1]
[0]
[flutter/flutter/issues/151641](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151641)
[1]
[dart-lang/sdk/issues/56232](https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/56232)
Stop running link hooks in debug mode.
Rationale: link hooks only get access to tree-shaking info in release builds, so they can't do anything meaningful in debug builds. Debug builds should be fast as development cycle, so running less is better.
More details:
* https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/1252
Also: rolls packages to latest versions.
## Implementation details
The decision whether linking is enabled is made as follows:
* For normal builds `build_info.dart::BuildMode` is used to determine whether Dart is compiled in JIT or AOT mode.
* Testers always run in JIT, so no linking.
* Native asset dry runs only run for JIT builds (e.g only when hot reload and hot restart are enabled).
## Testing
The integration test is updated to output an asset for linking if `BuildConfig.linkingEnabled` is true, and to output an asset for bundling directly if linking is not enabled.
These changes allow to override existing native endorsed (federated & inline) plugins with e.g. non-endorsed plugin implementations via direct dependencies as described in the section *Platform implementation selection* in the [design doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LD7QjmzJZLCopUrFAAE98wOUQpjmguyGTN2wd_89Srs).
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
name: example
dependencies:
my_plugin: ^0.0.1
my_plugin_android_alternative: ^0.0.1
```
Closes#80374, closes#59657
Related: Override Dart plugins (#87991, #79669)
While exploring https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/107607, I noticed that flutter_tools test results change based on whether `dart test` is run from a terminal or from a process (such as a Dart program). I also ran into this while writing tests for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150667.
This is due to tests that rely on the global `Stdio` instance, on which the `hasTerminal` property depends on whether the tool is being invoked from a terminal.
Ideally, `testUsingContext` would require any tests that depend on `globals.stdio` to define an override for `Stdio`, but this is not the case. Until a solution to this more general problem is figured out, I think we should have `testUsingContext` always provide a `Stdio` override by default.
The current URL has 2 /to, but it should only be 1. However, this url redirects to https://docs.flutter.dev/release/breaking-changes/android-java-gradle-migration-guide, so I can change it to that if it's preferred just to go to the final destination - just don't know if it's a redirect for a reason
i didn't create an issue as it's a doc change, but if that's a requirement I can do that
This PR changes the project name logic for `flutter create` to look for the name in the pubspec.yaml `name` field,
before falling back to the directory name.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/53106
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150645 tries to shut down Chrome by sending a browser close command through a debug protocol. The webkit_inspection_protocol library used to send the command may throw a SocketException if Chrome has already been shut down.
This changes the mapping for the Dart SDK inside Flutter from `org-dartlang-sdk:///third_party/dart/sdk` to org-dartlang-sdk:///flutter/third_party/dart/sdk`. This URI changed in https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51917 but was not caught by tests because they only tested a specific set of mappings and there were no integration tests checking what URIs were actually produced by a running app.
So, this change also adds an integration tests that ensures that a real running app produces URIs that are then correctly mapped.
Fixes https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5164.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150969
Initiated by: goderbauer
Reason for reverting: Failing test in https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8743574743030691569/+/u/run_android_obfuscate_test/stdout
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
The Gradle Kotlin DSL also allows for type-safe application of the Flutter Gradle plugin, which is currently undetected by the CLI
```kotlin
plugins {
dev.flutter.`flutter-gradle-plugin`
}
```
Please note that the added test case isn't ideal, since the example gradle isn't actually valid kotlin DSL, however the `kotlin host app language with Gradle Kotlin DSL` is identical
Fixes#149859
If the user specifies the `--no-web-resources-cdn` or `--local-web-sdk`, we should use the local version of CanvasKit. `flutter.js` now has a flag that can be specified in the build configuration that tells it to load locally instead.
Also, added a link to the relevant docs in the web template warnings.
This addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148713
Also fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145559
Work towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/132712.
After this PR, after a completed `flutter build apk` command, we:
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-disabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is `'false'`.
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-disabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is _missing_.
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-enabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is `'true'`.
We will need to change the default (see `_impellerEnabledByDefault` in `project.dart`) before releasing, otherwise we will misreport `manifest-impeller-disabled` at a much higher rate than actual. If there is a way to instead compute the default instead of hard-coding, that would have been good.
See <https://docs.flutter.dev/perf/impeller#android> for details on the key-value pair.
---
I also did a tad of TLC, by removing the (now-defunct) `Usage` events for `flutter build ios`, so they are consistent.
/cc @zanderso, @chinmaygarde, @jonahwilliams
The previous approach of killing the Chromium parent process sometimes caused leaks of child processes on Windows. The Browser.close command in the debug protocol will tell Chromium to shut down all of its processes.
Two issues I noticed when I hit the issue at https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149258
1. When the an app.stop event arrives from Flutter with an error, DAP does not pass that error back to the client so there's no visibility of the error.
2. If app.stop occurs but no app.start ever did, we leave the progress notification hanging around
This fixes both by handling app.stop and closing any open launch progress as well as passing any error to the client.
Fixes https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5124
Even though this does not fix the below issue lets land this anyway as not logging to stderr when clearing logs makes sense to me.
related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150093
The test added is bad. It does not verify the behavior changed.
To verify the behavior changed correctly I would need to modify the generic device class to have clearLogs be an async function like many of the other calls. That would mean modifying every other device type and their implementations and their tests. Then I would need to update android_device to expose its logger. That is more than I have time for to validate a 2% flake error.
Feel free to disagree in the comments on this pr.
PR to pave the way for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53001 to re-land
Summary:
- Enforces use of Kotlin >= `1.7.0` (please see below note)
- Fixes ci failures that prevented the above PR from landing.
Details:
Because it landed initially, we are able to fake the roll in this PR to fix all the tests ([see my comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149204#discussion_r1617924772)).
Fixes all the tests that failed:
1. `module_test` failing on multiple platforms (3/9 of the failures).
Failure is
```
> Android resource linking failed
ERROR:/b/s/w/ir/x/t/flutter_module_test.KECMXW/hello/.android/plugins_build_output/device_info/intermediates/merged_res/release/values/values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.
```
This is a rather unhelpful error message but some [folks online suggest](https://stackoverflow.com/a/69050529) that upgrading your `compileSdk` version fixes this.
These resolve when I remove the dependency on the long discontinued [package_info](https://pub.dev/packages/package_info) and [device_info](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info) packages, perhaps because they are transitively pulling in low `compileSdk` versions? This is unclear to me.
2. `module_custom_host_app_name_test` was failing for the same reason (another 3/9, or cumulative 6/9).
3. `tool_integration_tests_3_4` was a flake ð (7/9)
4. `framework_tests_slow` needed a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin (the flutter tool tells us this, so I just upgraded as suggested) and it resolved (8/9)
5.`android_preview_tool_integration_tests` needed newer AGP and KGP versions. I also refactored the tests, and bumped our error versions, fixing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142653.
**Note that the bump to KGP is not in line with our policy** - we didn't warn for `1.5.0-1.6.x` for a release (or at all) before dropping support. But I think it might still be justified:
- The bump to our androidx libraries unblocks ongoing Scribe work, and also includes a fix for a [memory leak](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129307#issuecomment-1601636959) and a [crash on folding phones](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/114868#issuecomment-2133226962), among many other bug fixes.
- Gradle [doesn't test on half of that range](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#kotlin), and so we implicitly can't claim to support it either. More generally, our Java and Kotlin support ranges should probably strictly fall within what Gradle tests.
This adds the 'fail-fast' argument to flutter test, since dart test already supports this feature. Tests can now be stopped after first failure.
Fixes#124406
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145158.
In an ideal world, the `--machine` flag would be strictly a global flag which sub-commands can choose to use (or perhaps just to report a `toolExit` that they don't have a `--machine` supported-mode if not. However currently, there is both a global flag, and command-specific flags.
This leads to the confusing scenario where:
```sh
flutter devices --machine
```
... still checks for a Flutter update, printing a banner and breaking the JSON output.
This PR "fixes" that by allowing `--machine` _anywhere_ in the command-line arguments to suppress the check.
/cc @johnmccutchan.
Currently, the error message displayed to regenerate the lockfiles gives a Unix-like command ./gradlew, which will be incorrect for Windows environments. This PR uses globals.platform.isWindows to give the appropriate command.
closes#136763
- When `--web-renderer` is omitted, keep the value `null` until it later materializes to either `canvaskit` or `skwasm`.
- No more hardcoded defaults anywhere. We use `WebRendererMode.defaultForJs/defaultForWasm` instead.
- When in `--wasm` mode, the JS fallback is now `canvaskit` instead of `auto`.
- Add test for defaulting to `skwasm` when `--wasm` is enabled.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149826
If the service is disposed when we make calls on it, we need to bubble up an exception that is understood by the callers.
This is another speculative fix for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149238.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149386. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106150.
The stocks test app includes Dart files containing localized messages generated by `package:flutter_localizations`. However, these files appear to have become out of date. Running `pub get` in the project will regenerate these files and generate a diff, which can be annoying when working on the repo.
This PR generates the files. ~~It also updates the templates for these files to be compliant with flutter/flutter repo lint rules, including `noop_primitive_operations` and `use_super_parameters`.~~ It also adds `// ignore_for_file: type=lint` to these files to disable linting for these files. This avoids issues like https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106150 and [this](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148741#issuecomment-2141161753).
Dart2wasm only needs a platform file, which contains the compiled
`dart:*` libraries. There's no need to specify a seperate `--dart-sdk`
option (anymore).
(See also https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/366821)
This PR modifies the `flutter create --empty` command to not delete the `test/` folder when run on an existing app project.
Before:
```bash
flutter create my_app --empty
mkdir my_app/test
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
flutter create my_app --empty
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test does not exist
```
After:
```bash
flutter create my_app --empty
mkdir my_app/test
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
flutter create my_app --empty
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134928
This PR adds support invoking `link.dart` hooks.
Link hooks can add new assets. Link hooks can transform assets sent to link hook from build hooks.
This PR does not yet add support for getting tree-shake information in the link hooks. This is pending on defining the `resources.json` format (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/55494).
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146263
## Implementation considerations
The build hooks could be run before Dart compilation and the link hooks after Dart compilation. (This is how it's done in Dart standalone.) However, due to the way the `Target`s are set up, this would require two targets and serializing and deserializing the `BuildResult` in between these. This would lead to more code but no benefits. Currently there is nothing that mandates running build hooks before Dart compilation.
## Testing
* The unit tests verify that the native_assets_builder `link` and `linkDryRun` would be invoked with help of the existing fake.
* The native assets integration test now also invokes an FFI call of a package that adds the asset during the link hook instead of the build hook.
* In order to keep coverage of the `flutter create --template=package_ffi`, `flutter create` is still run and the extra dependency is added and an extra ffi call is added. (Open to alternative suggestions.)
This PR adds a new flag `default-flavor` in the `flutter` section of `pubspec.yaml`. It allows developers of multi-flavor android apps to specify a default flavor to be used for `flutter run`, `flutter build` etc.
Using `flutter run` on flavored apps already works without specifying `--flavor` already works on iOS (it defaults to the `runner` schema), so I (and others in #22856) figured this would be nice to have.
fixes#22856
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148354
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147142
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147144
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
`'flutter create should tool exit if the template manifest cannot be read'` fails consistently, as shown by #148614.
The test expects a `ToolExit` with the message "Unable to read the template manifest", but depending on how the test is being run, a different exception ("Cannot create a project within the Flutter SDK") is sometimes thrown first.
This pull request relocates the test project to `dev/` to prevent the extraneous error.
Adds an empty privacy manifest, and commented out code to include it in the build, to the plugin template. This will make it much easier to explain how to add a privacy manifest in plugin docs, since instead of explaining the format of the file from scratch and providing example code to inculde it, we can just instruct people to add entries to an exisitng file and then uncomment a line or two. This will also make it much easier to figure out from the template output itself how to add support for people who don't find the documentation.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131940
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140013
DDS was temporarily pinned to 4.1.0 because 4.2.0 triggered some test
failures (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147250). Those
failures should be fixed by vm_service 14.2.2, so this unpins DDS and
rolls both of these packages (along with devtools_shared, which is a DDS
dependency).
(If the bot updates vm_service before this is done, I can rebase over
that will reduce the size of this PR to just a few files)
### Some background:
* Flutter registers the hot-restart service extension for all devices **except** web devices. For web devices, DWDS registers the service extensions.
* When a user is debugging their code via VS Code, the VS Code Dart extension [sends a hot-restart](94cb81c552/src/debug/run_daemon_base.ts (L100)) request via stdin/out to flutter_tools
* flutter_tools then [calls the "hotRestart" service extension](f3978c7a46/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/isolated/resident_web_runner.dart (L447)) (which, again, has been registered by DWDS)
### Why is this change necessary?
In DWDS, we are changing how we register the "hotRestart" service extension (here is the PR for that: https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/pull/2388). Previously, we registered the "hotRestart" service extension on a client that was directly connected to the VmService. With https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/pull/2388, we will be registering the "hotRestart" service extension on a client that is connected to DDS.
When a service extension is registered against DDS, DDS adds a prefix to the service extension method name (e.g. "hotRestart" becomes "s0.hotRestart"). It informs clients of the service extension name via `kServiceRegistered` events sent to the `Service` stream.
Therefore, this change simply listens to those service extension registered events, and uses them to determine the "hotRestart" service extension's method name.
Part of #137040 and #80374
- Extracted getting plugin implementation candidates and the default implementation to its own method
- Extracted resolving the plugin implementation to its own method
- Simplify candidate selection algorithm
- Support overriding inline dart implementation for an app-facing plugin
- Throw error, if a federated plugin implements an app-facing plugin, but also references a default implementation
- Throw error, if a plugin provides an inline implementation, but also references a default implementation
Fix dependency tracking in the build.
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147643
## Testing
It's not clear to me where to test the caching behavior of specific targets.
* test/general.shard/build_system/targets/common_test.dart
* This doesn't test the caching behavior of any targets
* test/general.shard/build_system/build_system_test.dart
* test/general.shard/cache_test.dart
* Both of these don't test specific `Target`s, these have `TestTarget`s.
* test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart
* This could work, but it's an integration test that already takes long to run.
This PR resolves#147806
- List plugin that want to be compiled against a higher Android SDK version
- List plugins that depend on a different NDK version (we don't have a way to compare them)
- Small formatting and wording improvements
- Update syntax to work for both Groovy and Kotlin
- If project uses `build.gradle.kts`, then it is mentioned in the warning message (previously always `build.gradle` was mentioned)
<img width="1209" alt="demo" src="https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/40357511/be3522b5-d1b4-4983-9fed-8aaa0f0bc7f7">
This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
final List<SupportedPlatform> platforms = includeRoot
? <SupportedPlatform>[SupportedPlatform.root]
: <SupportedPlatform>[];
if (android.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.android);
}
if (ios.exists) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.ios);
}
if (web.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.web);
}
if (macos.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.macos);
}
if (linux.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.linux);
}
if (windows.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.windows);
}
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.fuchsia);
}
return platforms;
}
// after
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
return <SupportedPlatform>[
if (includeRoot) SupportedPlatform.root,
if (android.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.android,
if (ios.exists) SupportedPlatform.ios,
if (web.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.web,
if (macos.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.macos,
if (linux.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.linux,
if (windows.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.windows,
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.fuchsia,
];
}
```
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146879 and https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145812. In these issues, we see what appears to be the flutter tool getting stuck somewhere during hot reload. It may help if we knew were exactly where we are getting stuck (preparing assets, writing them to device, etc.).
This PR adds a new parameter to `FlutterTestDriver::run`, `verbose`. When verbose is set, `FlutterTestDriver` will run `flutter` with `--verbose` in its tests. Keep in mind that `FlutterTestDriver` only prints logs from `flutter` when a test fails, so this shouldn't spam the logs of passing tests.
This PR sets the parameter when invoking the flaky tests from https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146879 and #145812, so we should see more detailed logs in future flakes.
While this is a low risk PR, you can verify the change by intentionally breaking hot reload code, clearing the cached tool binaries, and then running either of these tests.
## Description
This introduces a list of packages that we will explicitly not pin. It is to be used for things where the package isn't actually published, but is a transitive dependency of another package included in the SDK. This happens with the `macros` package, for instance, which depends on the private, unpublished, `_macros` package where the SDK does some tricky things to depend on it (it depends on "any", but ships it as part of the SDK).
Also ran `flutter update-packages --force-update` to update all of the pubspec files.
## Related Issues
- Fixes#147656
## Tests
- Added a test that makes sure that explicitly unpinned packages don't show up in the pinned list.
- added language for all code blocks
- replaced `bash` or `shell` with `sh` for consistency.
- added `sh` and `console` in the GitHub template link generator.
- updated test for GitHub template.
Uses kernel concatenation to concatenate the `program.dill` and `native_assets.dill`.
This will enable compiling `native_assets.dill` after `program.dill` so that tree-shaking information can be used.
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146270
## Implementation choices
* We can either run the frontend_server twice as a process invocation (current PR), or keep the process running after the dart compilation and then shut it down after native assets compilation to kernel. Keeping the process running would require more coordination between different `Target`s.
* We can either chose to only do separate kernel file compilation in release (AOT) builds, or do it both for JIT and AOT (current PR). Doing it differently in JIT/AOT means more conditionals in lib/src/build_system/targets/, doing it single-shot in JIT might be more performant though.
Update: Both of these are mitigated by not running the kernel compiler process if there are no native assets at all.
## Implementation notes
This only updates `flutter assemble`.
The kernel compilation calls in `flutter run` do not require kernel concatenation. The native-assets-kernel-mapping in `flutter run` contains results from `--dry-run` invocations of `hook/build.dart` (and in the future `hook/link.dart`). These `--dry-run` invocations do not get access to tree-shaking information, so the `link` hook to be introduced later can be run before Dart compilation.
## Tests
* Updated the `Target`s tests to reflect the new implementation.
## Related CLs
* frontend_server support: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/363567
* Same PR for Dart standalone: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/362384
When Swift Package Manager feature is enabled, create app and create plugin will have Swift Package Manager integration already added and will not need to undergo a migration.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146371.
```
flutter config --enable-swift-package-manager
flutter create --ios-language swift --platforms ios,macos swift_app_name
flutter create --ios-language objc --platforms ios objc_app_name
flutter create --template=plugin --ios-language swift --platforms ios,macos swift_plugin_name
flutter create --template=plugin --ios-language objc --platforms ios objc_plugin_name
```
Here's another PR with a couple of typos fixed. As you can see there was a typo in _fileReferenceI**n**dentifiers_, in class _ParsedProjectInfo._ Maybe we should do some check on that since I'm not sure if that property is used somewhere outside Flutter?
From https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348#issuecomment-2016047148:
> before we ship, we should add a printTrace to the tool about each asset transformer we're invoking and the path/arguments we called it with
I think this is a good idea since asset transformers can be arbitrary Dart programsâmeaning that a lot can go wrong when running them. For example, they can hang indefinitely or perform some sort of I/O that later results in a tool crash. Knowing that asset transformation was involved when debugging a crash (or a slow/stuck `flutter build`) could be useful, so I think adding a `printTrace` or two is a good idea (or at least not a bad one).
This PR will opt out users from legacy analytics if they have already been opted out from package:unified_analytics.
After successfully merging into main, this will be CP'd into beta and stable channels
This PR adds initial support for Swift Package Manager (SPM). Users must opt in. Only compatible with Xcode 15+.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146369.
## Included Features
This PR includes the following features:
* Enabling SPM via config
`flutter config --enable-swift-package-manager`
* Disabling SPM via config (will disable for all projects)
`flutter config --no-enable-swift-package-manager`
* Disabling SPM via pubspec.yaml (will disable for the specific project)
```
flutter:
disable-swift-package-manager: true
```
* Migrating existing apps to add SPM integration if using a Flutter plugin with a Package.swift
* Generates a Swift Package (named `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage`) that handles Flutter SPM-compatible plugin dependencies. Generated package is added to the Xcode project.
* Error parsing of common errors that may occur due to using CocoaPods and Swift Package Manager together
* Tool will print warnings when using all Swift Package plugins and encourage you to remove CocoaPods
This PR also converts `integration_test` and `integration_test_macos` plugins to be both Swift Packages and CocoaPod Pods.
## How it Works
The Flutter CLI will generate a Swift Package called `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage`, which will have local dependencies on all Swift Package compatible Flutter plugins.
The `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage` package will be added to the Xcode project via altering of the `project.pbxproj`.
In addition, a "Pre-action" script will be added via altering of the `Runner.xcscheme`. This script will invoke the flutter tool to copy the Flutter/FlutterMacOS framework to the `BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR` directory before the build starts. This is needed because plugins need to be linked to the Flutter framework and fortunately Swift Package Manager automatically uses `BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR` as a framework search path.
CocoaPods will continue to run and be used to support non-Swift Package compatible Flutter plugins.
## Not Included Features
It does not include the following (will be added in future PRs):
* Create plugin template
* Create app template
* Add-to-App integration
Changing the web renderer doesn't directly modify the environment's dart defines, and so doesn't do a full build invalidation. We need to include the web renderer in the build key for the compiler configuration. This information is used directly by the web targets to modify the dart defines that are passed into the compiler, so we need to rebuild if this information changes.
When performing artifact lookups for `Artifact.genSnapshot` for macOS desktop builds, a `TargetPlatform` is used to determine the name of the tool, typically `gen_snapshot_$TARGET_ARCH`. Formerly, this tool was always named `gen_snapshot`.
The astute reader may ask "but Chris, didn't we support TWO target architectures on iOS and therefore need TWO `gen_snapshot` binaries?" Yes, we did support both armv7 and arm64 target architectures on iOS. But no, we didn't initially have two `gen_snapshot` binaries. We did *build* two `gen_snapshots`:
* A 32-bit x86 binary that emitted armv7 AOT code
* A 64-bit x64 binary that emitted arm64 AOT code
At the time, the bitness of the `gen_snapshot` tool needed to match the bitness of the target architecture, and to avoid having to do a lot of work plumbing through suffixed `gen_snapshot` names, the author of that work (who, as evidenced by this patch, is still paying for his code crimes) elected to "cleverly" lipo the two together into a single multi-architecture macOS binary still named `gen_snapshot`. See: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/4948
This was later remediated over the course of several patches, including:
* https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/10430
* https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/22818
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/37445
However, there were still cases (notably `--local-engine` workflows in the tool) where we weren't computing the target platform and thus referenced the generic `gen_snapshot` tool.
See: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/38933
Fixed in: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/28345
The test removed in this PR, which ensured that null `SnapshotType.platform` was supported was introduced in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/11924 as a followup to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/11820 when the snapshotting logic was originally extracted to the `GenSnapshot` class, and most invocations still passed a null target platform.
Since there are no longer any cases where `TargetPlatform` isn't passed when looking up `Artifact.genSnapshot`, we can safely make the platform non-nullable and remove the test.
This is pre-factoring towards the removal of the generic `gen_snapshot` artifact from the macOS host binaries (which are currently unused since we never pass a null `TargetPlatform`), which is pre-factoring towards the goal of building `gen_snapshot` binaries with an arm64 host architecture, and eliminate the need to use Rosetta during iOS and macOS Flutter builds.
Part of: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101138
Umbrella issue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/103386
Umbrella issue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/69157
No new tests since the behaviour is enforced by the compiler.
This tweaks the Flutter doctor messages for CocoaPods.
This also switches the "unknown version" error to link to the update instructions instead of the installation instructions; the user has already installed CocoaPods in this scenario.
Example error before:
```
â CocoaPods not installed.
CocoaPods is used to retrieve the iOS and macOS platform side's plugin code that responds to your plugin usage on the Dart side.
Without CocoaPods, plugins will not work on iOS or macOS.
For more info, see https://flutter.dev/platform-plugins
To install see https://guides.cocoapods.org/using/getting-started.html#installation for instructions.
```
Example error after:
```
â CocoaPods not installed.
CocoaPods is a package manager for iOS or macOS platform code.
Without CocoaPods, plugins will not work on iOS or macOS.
For more info, see https://flutter.dev/platform-plugins
For installation instructions, see https://guides.cocoapods.org/using/getting-started.html#installation
```
In a ProxiedDevicePortForwarder, there might be a race condition where the local socket has been disconnected, but the remote end was still sending new data. In this case, avoid forwarding new data to the socket.
This adds support for adding the `--wasm` flag to `flutter run` and `flutter drive`
* Emits errors if you attempt to use the skwasm renderer without the `--wasm` flag
* Emits errors if you try to use `--wasm` when not using a web device
* Uses the skwasm renderer by default if you pass `--wasm` and no `--web-renderer`
Convert `ProjectMigration.run()` and `ProjectMigrator.migrate()` to be async.
Needed for Swift Package Manager migration, which requires some async processes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146256
Also move the vm service discovery logic into platform-specific implementation of `Device`s. This is to avoid having platform-specific code in attach.dart.
Xcode 15 will be required for iOS App Store submission
> Please note that as of April 2024 all iOS and iPadOS apps submitted to the App Store must be built with a minimum of Xcode 15 and the iOS 17 SDK.
https://developer.apple.com/ios/submit/
And will also be required for Swift Package Manager support https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146256.
We could swap to "required" but macOS developers don't technically need to upgrade. We can let the Store itself enforce its policies. And we can swap to Xcode 15 "required" when SPM adoption is further along.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144582
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144454
For reference, after formatting it looks like:
```
ââ Flutter Fix âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
â [!] Your project requires a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin. â
â Find the latest version on https://kotlinlang.org/docs/releases.html#release-details, then update the â
â version number of the plugin with id "org.jetbrains.kotlin.android" in the plugins block of â
â /Users/mackall/development/BugTesting/ELIMINATEME/blah/android/settings.gradle. â
â â
â Alternatively (if your project was created before Flutter 3.19), update â
â /Users/mackall/development/BugTesting/ELIMINATEME/blah/android/build.gradle â
â ext.kotlin_version = '<latest-version>' â
ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
```
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
This PR makes hot reloads reflect changes to transformer configurations under the `assets` section in pubspec.yaml.
This PR is optimized for ease of implementation, and should not be merged as-is. If it is merged as-is, seriously consider creating a tech debt issue and assigning it to someone to make sure it gets resolved.
There are two issues in the previous implementation:
1. `_populateDevices` will return the devices from `deviceNotifier` if it had been initialized, assuming that once it's initialized, it has been properly populated. That assumption is not true because calling getters like `onAdded` would initialize `deviceNotifier` without populating it.
2. `deviceNotifier` instance might be replaced in some cases, causing `onAdded` subscribers to lose any future updates.
To fix (1), this commit added the `isPopulated` field in `deviceNotifier` as a more accurate flag to determine if we need to populate it.
To fix (2), this commit made `deviceNotifier` a final member in `PolingDeviceDiscovery`.
* Adds support for `flutter test --wasm`.
* The test compilation flow is a bit different now, so that it supports compilers other than DDC. Specifically, when we run a set of unit tests, we generate a "switchboard" main function that imports each unit test and runs the main function for a specific one based off of a value set by the JS bootstrapping code. This way, there is one compile step and the same compile output is invoked for each unit test file.
* Also, removes all references to `dart:html` from flutter/flutter.
* Adds CI steps for running the framework unit tests with dart2wasm+skwasm
* These steps are marked as `bringup: true`, so we don't know what kind of failures they will result in. Any failures they have will not block the tree at all yet while we're still in `bringup: true`. Once this PR is merged, I plan on looking at any failures and either fixing them or disabling them so we can get these CI steps running on presubmit.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126692
Pre work for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51229. Removes a lot of code referencing v1 of the android embedding, though not necessarily all of it (I may have missed some, it is hard to know).
Will hopefully make landing that PR less painful (or maybe painless?)
A ProxiedDevice has two port forwarder, one to forward remote host port and another to forward remote device port. During an attach workflow, the port was forwarded by the latter. Update ProxiedDDS to make sure that it works in such case.
This manually rolls pub packages and updates some calls to use updated APIs that use `Uri` instead of file paths (since macro-generated sources don't exist as files on disk).
This makes several changes to flutter web app bootstrapping.
* The build now produces a `flutter_bootstrap.js` file.
* By default, this file does the basic streamlined startup of a flutter app with the service worker settings and no user configuration.
* The user can also put a `flutter_bootstrap.js` file in the `web` subdirectory in the project directory which can have whatever custom bootstrapping logic they'd like to write instead. This file is also templated, and can use any of the tokens that can be used with the `index.html` (with the exception of `{{flutter_bootstrap_js}}`, see below).
* Introduced a few new templating tokens for `index.html`:
* `{{flutter_js}}` => inlines the entirety of `flutter.js`
* `{{flutter_service_worker_version}}` => replaced directly by the service worker version. This can be used instead of the script that sets the `serviceWorkerVersion` local variable that we used to have by default.
* `{{flutter_bootstrap_js}}` => inlines the entirety of `flutter_bootstrap.js` (this token obviously doesn't apply to `flutter_bootstrap.js` itself).
* Changed `IndexHtml` to be called `WebTemplate` instead, since it is used for more than just the index.html now.
* We now emit warnings at build time for certain deprecated flows:
* Warn on the old service worker version pattern (i.e.`(const|var) serviceWorkerVersion = null`) and recommends using `{{flutter_service_worker_version}}` token instead
* Warn on use of `FlutterLoader.loadEntrypoint` and recommend using `FlutterLoader.load` instead
* Warn on manual loading of `flutter_service_worker.js`.
* The default `index.html` on `flutter create` now uses an async script tag with `flutter_bootstrap.js`.
Some tests are assuming the flutter sdk code is being checked out to flutter and checking the code to a different repository makes them fail.
Bug: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144487
Reverts: flutter/flutter#144752
Initiated by: andrewkolos
Reason for reverting: compilation issue has turned the tree red
Original PR Author: andrewkolos
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino}
This change reverts the following previous change:
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
When invoking a package to transform an asset, we set `FLUTTER_BUILD_MODE` to the CLI name of the build mode being used. Inspired by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101077#issuecomment-1890379501:
> Do transformers know whether they get executed in debug or release mode? I kinda imagine that being useful. Ex: There's a transformer that optimizes the file size of images. Depending on the amount and size of the images, that could take a significant amount of time. Therefore, I might want to only execute it in release builds.
Note for the reviewer: the interesting part of this change can be found in the commit [set environment variable to build mode when running asset transformer…](579912d470). The rest of the change is updating call sites with a new argument.
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
When invoking a package to transform an asset, we set `FLUTTER_BUILD_MODE` to the CLI name of the build mode being used. Inspired by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101077#issuecomment-1890379501:
> Do transformers know whether they get executed in debug or release mode? I kinda imagine that being useful. Ex: There's a transformer that optimizes the file size of images. Depending on the amount and size of the images, that could take a significant amount of time. Therefore, I might want to only execute it in release builds.
Note for the reviewer: the interesting part of this change can be found in the commit [set environment variable to build mode when running asset transformerâ¦](579912d470). The rest of the change is updating call sites with a new argument.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143703
We need to make sure that when source maps are enabled for the dart2js target, it advertises the sourcemap file as one of its outputs so that the web release bundle can copy it over.
The flutter engine & framework can opt out of this optimization for
individual classes / class hierarchies via:
* `@pragma(flutter:keep-to-string)`
* `@pragma(flutter:keep-to-string-in-subtypes)`
Or by using the convenience constant `@keepToString` from `dart:ui`.
=> This aligns the build process more with g3 (which already does this)
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/52759
Part of #137040 and #80374
The flag `throwOnPluginPubspecError` never actually was enabled during production in #79669, but only in some dart plugin tests. And in the tests the case of the error when enabling the flag was not explicitly tested. The only thing tested was, that it is not thrown when disabled.
As explained [here](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142035#discussion_r1484237904) the only case, where this error could be thrown is, when a dart implementation and a native inline implementation are provided simultaneously. But throwing an exception there is a wrong behavior, as both can coexist in a plugin package, thus in the pubspec file.
Disabling the flag means, that the error is not thrown and not shown to the user. This is the case in production (contrary to the dart plugin tests), which acts like these plugin cases of implementations are just skipped. And this is what actually should be done.
In conclusion, I think the case of coexisting dart and native implementation in pubspec was just overlooked and therefore this error validation was introduced, which is not necessary or even valid.
For more discussion, see: https://discord.com/channels/608014603317936148/608022056616853515/1200194937791205436
- This is tricky: I already added a test in #142035, which finally complies with the other tests, by removing the flag. So I think it falls in the category of "remove dead code".
- Theoretically this is a breaking change, as removing / altering some tests. But the flag actually was never valid or used, so IDK. But this may not does fall in the category of "contributed tests".
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
`DevFSBytesContent` (and it's descendant `DevFSStringContent`) have setters that change the underlying content. These are unused outside of tests, so this PR removes them. Amongst other things, this could help me refactor https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144660 into something that has fewer pitfalls.
This is purely a refactoring.
Partial implementation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
This enables asset transformation during hot reload (except for web, because that has its own implementation of `DevFS` ð). Asset transformers will be reapplied after changing any asset and performing a hot reload during `flutter run`.
Explicitly handle the case where the iOS device is not paired. On `flutter run` show an error and bail instead of trying and failing to launch on the device.
On this PR:
```
$ flutter run -d 00008110-0009588C2651401E
'iPhone' is not paired. Open Xcode and trust this computer when prompted.
$
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144447
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144095
Originally, my aim was just to refactor (as per usual), but while messing around with the `TableBorder.symmetric` constructor, I realized that `borderRadius` was missing!
This pull request makes a few class constructors more efficient, and it fixes#144277 by adding the missing parameter.
<br>
Reverts flutter/flutter#143244
Initiated by: vashworth
Reason for reverting: Increased `flutter_framework_uncompressed_bytes` - see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144251
Original PR Author: vashworth
Reviewed By: {jmagman}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Replace `FlutterMacOS.framework` cached artifact with `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`. Also, update usage of `FlutterMacOS.framework` to use `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126016.
So far `flutter build web --wasm` was always stripping wasm symbols
except if `--no-strip-wasm` is passed.
=> Ensure that in profile mode we also keep the symbols
Replace `FlutterMacOS.framework` cached artifact with `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`. Also, update usage of `FlutterMacOS.framework` to use `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126016.
When the daemon throws an exception, the receiving client is unable to surface stack traces from the daemon.
This is because it is sent with the `trace` key here:
1e8dd1e4d6/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/daemon.dart (L308)
But the client tries to read it with the `stackTrace` key here:
1e8dd1e4d6/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/daemon.dart (L343)
Thanks to @mraleph for spotting this!
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
b/326825892
Part of #137040 and #80374
- Differentiate pubspec and resolution errors
- Rename platform to platformKey
- Add TODO for rework logic of flag [throwOnPluginPubspecError]
- Swap for loop: handle by platform and then by plugin
### Context:
DDC modules are abstractions over how libraries are loaded/updated. The entirety of google3 uses the DDC/legacy module system due to its flexibility extensibility over the other two (ES6 and AMD/RequireJS). Unifying DDC's module system saves us from duplicating work and will allow us to have finer grained control over how JS modules are loaded. This is a a prerequisite to features such as hot reload.
### Overview:
This change plumbs a boolean flag through flutter_tools that switches between DDC (new) and AMD (current) modules. This mode is automatically applied when `--extra-front-end-options=--dartdevc-module-format=ddc` is specified alongside `flutter run`. Other important additions include:
* Splitting Flutter artifacts between DDC and AMD modules
* Adding unit tests for the DDC module system
* Additional bootstrapper logic for the DDC module system
We don't expect to see any user-visible behavior or performance differences.
This is dependent on [incoming module system support in DWDS](https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/pull/2295) and [additional artifacts in the engine](https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/47783).
This is part of a greater effort to deprecate the AMD module system: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52361
This pull request fixes#143803 by taking advantage of Dart's null-aware operators.
And unlike `switch` expressions ([9 PRs](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143634) and counting), the Flutter codebase is already fantastic when it comes to null-aware coding. After refactoring the entire repo, all the changes involving `?.` and `??` can fit into a single pull request.
This PR implements the functionality described above and hides it behind
the `--experimental-faster-testing` flag of `flutter test`.
### The following are some performance measurements from test runs
conducted on GitHub Actions
run 1 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/1
run 2 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/2
run 3 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/3
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/animation
test/foundation` step**
run 1: 54s
run 2: 52s
run 3: 56s
average: 54s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/animation test/foundation` step**
run 1: 27s
run 2: 27s
run 3: 29s
average: 27.67s (~48.77% shorter than 54s)
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/animation
test/foundation test/gestures test/painting test/physics test/rendering
test/scheduler test/semantics test/services` step**
run 1: 260s
run 2: 270s
run 3: 305s
average: 278.33s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/animation test/foundation test/gestures
test/painting test/physics test/rendering test/scheduler test/semantics
test/services` step**
from a clean build (right after deleting the build folder):
run 1: 215s
run 2: 227s
run 3: 245s
average: 229s (~17.72% shorter than 278.33s)
Note that in reality, `test/material` was not passed to `flutter test`
in the trials below. All of the test files under `test/material` except
for `test/material/icons_test.dart` were listed out individually
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/material` step**
run 1: 408s
run 2: 421s
run 3: 451s
average: 426.67s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/material` step**
run 1: 382s
run 2: 373s
run 3: 400s
average: 385s (~9.77% shorter than 426.67s)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Field <dnfield@google.com>
Update: Accidentally use `--O4` instead of `-O4` in `dev/devicelab/lib/tasks/web_benchmarks.dart` update.
Original description:
* Make `flutter build web` have one option that determins the
optimization level: `-O<level>` / `--optimization-level=<level>` =>
Defaulting to -O4 => Will apply to both dart2js and dart2wasm
* Deprecate `--dart2js-optimization=O<level>`
* Disentagle concept of optimization from concept of static symbols =>
Add a `--strip-wasm` / `--no-strip-wasm` flag that determins whether
static symbols are kept in the resulting wasm file.
* Remove copy&past'ed code in the tests for wasm build tests
* Cleanup some artifacts code, now that we no longer use `wasm-opt`
inside flutter tools
Reverts flutter/flutter#143517
Initiated by: dnfield
Reason for reverting: broke CI, see https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux%20web_benchmarks_skwasm/3446/overview
Original PR Author: mkustermann
Reviewed By: {eyebrowsoffire}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
* Make `flutter build web` have one option that determins the optimization level: `-O<level>` / `--optimization-level=<level>` => Defaulting to -O4 => Will apply to both dart2js and dart2wasm
* Deprecate `--dart2js-optimization=O<level>`
* Disentagle concept of optimization from concept of static symbols => Add a `--strip-wasm` / `--no-strip-wasm` flag that determins whether static symbols are kept in the resulting wasm file.
* Remove copy&past'ed code in the tests for wasm build tests
* Cleanup some artifacts code, now that we no longer use `wasm-opt` inside flutter tools
* Make `flutter build web` have one option that determins the
optimization level: `-O<level>` / `--optimization-level=<level>` =>
Defaulting to -O4 => Will apply to both dart2js and dart2wasm
* Deprecate `--dart2js-optimization=O<level>`
* Disentagle concept of optimization from concept of static symbols =>
Add a `--strip-wasm` / `--no-strip-wasm` flag that determins whether
static symbols are kept in the resulting wasm file.
* Remove copy&past'ed code in the tests for wasm build tests
* Cleanup some artifacts code, now that we no longer use `wasm-opt`
inside flutter tools
Add column information as table header for `flutter emulators` command.
**Before:**
```
2 available emulators:
Pixel_3_API_30 ⢠Pixel 3 API 30 ⢠Google ⢠android
Resizable_API_33 ⢠Resizable API 33 ⢠Google ⢠android
To run an emulator, run 'flutter emulators --launch <emulator id>'.
To create a new emulator, run 'flutter emulators --create [--name xyz]'.
You can find more information on managing emulators at the links below:
https://developer.android.com/studio/run/managing-avdshttps://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/avdmanager
```
**After:**
```
2 available emulators:
Id ⢠Name ⢠Manufacturer ⢠Platform
Pixel_3_API_30 ⢠Pixel 3 API 30 ⢠Google ⢠android
Resizable_API_33 ⢠Resizable API 33 ⢠Google ⢠android
To run an emulator, run 'flutter emulators --launch <emulator id>'.
To create a new emulator, run 'flutter emulators --create [--name xyz]'.
You can find more information on managing emulators at the links below:
https://developer.android.com/studio/run/managing-avdshttps://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/avdmanager
```
fixes#140656
* Flags to `dart compile wasm`
Some options are not relevant to a standalone user of `dart compile
wasm` (e.g. specyfing dart-sdk, platform file etc). => Those aren't
offered by the `dart compile wasm` tool directly. => We use the
`--extra-compiler-option=` instead which passes through arbitrary
options to the dart2wasm compiler. => We don't maintain compatibility of
those options, if we update them we'll ensure to also update flutter
tools
* Binaryen optimization passes
This change will mean we use the binaryen flags from Dart SDK which are
slightly different from the ones in flutter.
* Optimization configuration
This change will also start using the more standardized `-O` flag for
determining optimization levels. The meaning of those flags have been
mostly aligned with dart2js (with some differences remaining).
* Minimization
Using the new optimization flags, namely `-O4` for `--wasm-opt=full`,
will automatically enable the new `--minify` support. Minification is
Dart semantics preserving but changes the `<obj>.runtimeType.toString()`
to use minified names (just as in dart2js).
* Code size changes
Overall this change will reduce wonderous code size by around 10%.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/54675
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348.
**Issue.** The `equals` implementation of `AssetsEntry` is incorrect. It compares `flavors` lists using reference equality. This PR addresses this.
This also adds a test to make sure valid asset `flavors` declarations are parsed correctly.
While we are here, this PR also includes a couple of refactorings:
* `flutter_manifest_test.dart` is a bit large. To better match our style guide, I've factored out some related tests into their own file.
* A couple of changes to the `_validateListType` function in `flutter_manifest.dart`:
* The function now returns a list of errors instead of accepting a list to append onto. This is more readable and also allows callers to know which errors were found by the call.
* The function is renamed to `_validateList` and now accepts an `Object?` instead of an `YamlList`. If the argument is null, an appropriate error message is contained in the output. This saves callers that are only interested in validation from having to write their own null-check, which they all did before.
* Some error strings were tweaked for increased readability and/or grammatical correctness.
This is an attempt at a reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141396
The main changes here that are different than the original PR is fixes to wire up the `flutter test` command properly with the web renderer.
This is in service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141194
This will make it easier to get the `flutter run -d <browser>` and `flutter build fuschia` cases easier to get under test.
