Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
This pull request aims to improve code readability, based on feedback gathered in a recent design doc.
<br>
There are two factors that hugely impact how easy it is to understand a piece of code: **verbosity** and **complexity**.
Reducing **verbosity** is important, because boilerplate makes a project more difficult to navigate. It also has a tendency to make one's eyes gloss over, and subtle typos/bugs become more likely to slip through.
Reducing **complexity** makes the code more accessible to more people. This is especially important for open-source projects like Flutter, where the code is read by those who make contributions, as well as others who read through source code as they debug their own projects.
<hr>
<br>
The following examples show how pattern-matching might affect these two factors:
<details> <summary><h3>Example 1 (GOOD)</h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (ancestor case InheritedElement(:final InheritedTheme widget)) {
themes.add(widget);
}
```
Without using patterns, this might expand to
```dart
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget widget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(widget);
}
}
```
Had `ancestor` been a non-local variable, it would need to be "converted" as well:
```dart
final Element ancestor = this.ancestor;
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget inheritedWidget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(theme);
}
}
```
</details>
<details> <summary><h3>Example 2 (BAD) </h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (widget case PreferredSizeWidget(preferredSize: Size(:final double height))) {
return height;
}
```
Assuming `widget` is a non-local variable, this would expand to:
```dart
final Widget widget = this.widget;
if (widget is PreferredSizeWidget) {
return widget.preferredSize.height;
}
```
<br>
</details>
In both of the examples above, an `if-case` statement simultaneously verifies that an object meets the specified criteria and performs a variable assignment accordingly.
But there are some differences: Example 2 uses a more deeply-nested pattern than Example 1 but makes fewer useful checks.
**Example 1:**
- checks that `ancestor` is an `InheritedElement`
- checks that the inherited element's `widget` is an `InheritedTheme`
**Example 2:**
- checks that `widget` is a `PreferredSizeWidget`
(every `PreferredSizeWidget` has a `size` field, and every `Size` has a `height` field)
<br>
<hr>
I feel hesitant to try presenting a set of cut-and-dry rules as to which scenarios should/shouldn't use pattern-matching, since there are an abundance of different types of patterns, and an abundance of different places where they might be used.
But hopefully the conversations we've had recently will help us converge toward a common intuition of how pattern-matching can best be utilized for improved readability.
<br><br>
- resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152313
- Design Doc: [flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns](https://flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns)
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150733
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: This breaks apps that use plugins that use `compileSdk` 31, some of which we use in our postsubmit (so it blocks the tree).
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {jason-simmons}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Manual engine roll to https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53532, because the roll requires lockfile generation.
Manual recreation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148911
Entire PR is just the output of
```
flutter update-packages --force-upgrade
```
followed by (run from the root of the flutter repo)
```
find . -type d -name 'android' | dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
DDS was temporarily pinned to 4.1.0 because 4.2.0 triggered some test
failures (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147250). Those
failures should be fixed by vm_service 14.2.2, so this unpins DDS and
rolls both of these packages (along with devtools_shared, which is a DDS
dependency).
(If the bot updates vm_service before this is done, I can rebase over
that will reduce the size of this PR to just a few files)
Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146181.
Just 3 commits:
1. a revert of the revert
2. the fix described in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146181#issuecomment-2038238869
3. updating two postsubmit tests from Java 11 to 17, as that is required for this new AGP version.
I've verified that `flutter build apk --flavor paid --debug` fails in `dev/integration_tests/flavors/` with the error in ci without (2), and succeeds with it.
I've also verified that the `dev/benchmarks/complex_layout` app builds successfully with Java 17.
That covers all the postsubmits that failed according [to the dashboard](https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#146181
Initiated by: LongCatIsLooong
Reason for reverting: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_android%20flavors_test_win/11086/overview
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, christopherfujino}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Bump almost all tests to AGP 8.1 and Gradle 8.3
Flutter gallery is excluded, because it uses discontinued plugins that in turn use old Gradle versions, and that prevents upgrading. Will take some extra work to figure out what to do there.
Should bump templates next
Entire PR generated with the lockfile generation script, except for:
1. changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/`, which must be done manually (and exclusion of the gallery for reason mentioned above).
2. Changes to many `AndroidManifest.xml` files to remove the `package` attribute and instead set that same value in the `build.gradle`, in the `namespace` attribute of the `android` closure (corresponds to an AGP behavior change, see https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace).
3. Removes the use of the `battery` plugin in `android_embedding_v2_smoke_test` because the plugin is discontinued, unused, and blocks upgrading the AGP version for that app because the discontinued plugin itself uses a very old AGP version.
Bump almost all tests to AGP 8.1 and Gradle 8.3
Flutter gallery is excluded, because it uses discontinued plugins that in turn use old Gradle versions, and that prevents upgrading. Will take some extra work to figure out what to do there.
Should bump templates next
Entire PR generated with the lockfile generation script, except for:
1. changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/`, which must be done manually (and exclusion of the gallery for reason mentioned above).
2. Changes to many `AndroidManifest.xml` files to remove the `package` attribute and instead set that same value in the `build.gradle`, in the `namespace` attribute of the `android` closure (corresponds to an AGP behavior change, see https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace).
3. Removes the use of the `battery` plugin in `android_embedding_v2_smoke_test` because the plugin is discontinued, unused, and blocks upgrading the AGP version for that app because the discontinued plugin itself uses a very old AGP version.
This PR is to update material_color_utilities package version to the latest. `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_fruit_salad.dart` and `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_rainbow.dart` are exported after version 0.9.0.
Once this PR is merged, we don't need to explicitly import these two files like the change in PR #144805, which breaks some dependencies in `Google testing`.
This pull request refactors if-statements into switch expressions, as part of the effort to solve issue #144903.
Making changes beyond just swapping syntax is more difficult (and also more difficult to review, I apologize), but much more satisfying too.
Entire pr generated with [ktlint](https://github.com/pinterest/ktlint) --format. First step before enabling linting as part of presubmit for kotlin changes.
Re-sets two jvmargs that were getting cleared because we set a value for `-Xmx`. Could help with https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142957. Copied from comment here https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142957:
>Two random things I ran into while looking into this that might help:
>
>1. Gradle has defaults for a couple of the jvmargs, and setting any one of them clears those defaults for the others (bug here https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/19750). This can cause the "Gradle daemon to consume more and more native memory until it crashes", though the bug typically has a different associated error. It seems worth it to re-set those defaults.
>2. There is a property we can set that will give us a heap dump on OOM ([-XX:HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/troubleshoot/clopts001.html))
Mostly just a find and replace from `find . -name gradle.properties -exec sed -i '' 's/\-Xmx4G/-Xmx4G\ \-XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=2G\ \-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError/g' {} \;`, with the templates and the one test that writes from a string replaced by hand. I didn't set a value for `MaxMetaspaceSize` in the template files because I want to make sure this value doesn't cause problems in ci first (changes to the templates are essentially un-revertable for those who `flutter create` while the changes exist).
Previously, we were comparing the signed int `target_length` (returned by WideCharToMultiByte) to a size_t string length, resulting in a signed/unsigned comparison warning as follows:
```
windows\runner\utils.cpp(54,43): warning C4018: '>': signed/unsigned mismatch
```
WideCharToMultiByte returns:
* 0 on error
* the number of bytes written to the buffer pointed to by its fifth parameter, lpMultiByteStr, on success.
As a result it's safe to store the return value in an unsigned int, which eliminates the warning.
No changes to tests since this is dependent on end-user project settings/modifications and does not trigger a warning with default project settings.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134227
