This is the initial tooling work for Flutter Widget Previews, adding two
commands: `flutter widget-preview start` and `flutter widget-preview
clean`.
The `start` command currently only checks to see if
`.dart_tool/widget_preview_scaffold/` exists and creates a new Flutter
project using the widget_preview_scaffold template if one isn't found.
The widget_preview_scaffold template currently only contains some
placeholder files and will be updated to include additional code
required by the scaffold.
The `clean` command simply deletes `.dart_tool/widget_preview_scaffold/`
if it's found.
This change also includes some refactoring of the `create` command in
order to share some project creation logic without requiring `flutter
widget-preview start` to spawn a new process simply to run `flutter
create -t widget_preview .dart_tool/widget_preview_scaffold`.
Related issue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/115704
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Kolos <andrewrkolos@gmail.com>
This adds support for web 1.x.x to be included in the plugin template, when creating a web plugin.
I don't have an issue referenced. Related to https://github.com/dart-lang/web/issues/316
Almost all of the code is just adopting to changes to the APIs of
`package:native_assets_builder`, `package:native_assets_cli` and
`package:native_toolchain_c`
There's only two semantic changes
* Removes a test that checks for a verification error if a build hook
produces a static library if the preferred linking mode is dynamic:
=> The test is written in a very hacky way. By monkey patching the build
config.json that flutter build actually made. This monkey patching
relies on package:cli_config which is now no longer used.
=> The actual code that checks for this mismatch lives in
dart-lang/native repository and is tested there. So there's really no
need to duplicate that.
* The `package:native_assets_builder` no longer knows about code assets.
This is something a user of that package (e.g. flutter tools) adds. Now
the dry-run functionality will invoke build hooks who produce code
assets without an architecture.
=> The `package:native_assets_builder` used to expand such a code asset
to N different code assets (one for each supported architecture)
=> This logic was now moved to flutter tools. => In the near future
we're going to this dry-run complexity, which will then also get rid of
this uglyness (of expanding to all archs of an OS).
We added `use_modular_headers!` to our `Podfile`s as we originally planned to phase out `use_frameworks!` (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/42204). However, our plans have now changed and we are instead phasing out CocoaPods entirely in favor of Swift Package Manager.
CocoaPods's `use_frameworks!` and `use_modular_headers!` are two different overlapping options that should not be used together. This change removes the `use_modular_headers!` from the macOS `Podfile` and the iOS Swift `Podfile` (the iOS Objective-C template was recently deprecated https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/155867).
This change only affects _new_ Flutter apps. This change does not include an automatic migration as that could break existing apps. Instead, users are encouraged to migrate from CocoaPods to Swift Package Manager.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/156259
Reverts: flutter/flutter#154061
Initiated by: QuncCccccc
Reason for reverting: might be the reason that cause Framework tree to red
Original PR Author: bartekpacia
Reviewed By: {gmackall, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR resolves#151166
Allows applying of `include_flutter.groovy` via the `apply from:` syntax, which allows using a host app that is using the Gradle Kotlin DSL (the default these days when creating an Android app in AS).
Explanation: The `include_flutter.groovy` script is currently not able to be called by Kotlin gradle files, because it is [intended to be invoked with the following lines](https://docs.flutter.dev/add-to-app/android/project-setup#depend-on-the-modules-source-code):
```
setBinding(new Binding([gradle: this])) // new
evaluate(new File( // new
settingsDir.parentFile, // new
'flutter_module/.android/include_flutter.groovy' // new
))
```
`setBinding` isn't part of the Kotlin gradle DSL, and there isn't (that I can find) an easy Kotlin equivalent. If this binding isn't set, the reference to `gradle` in `include_flutter.groovy` is wrong, which breaks the script.
This PR modifies `include_flutter.groovy` to also support being invoked through the standard way of invoking a script via the Gradle Groovy/Kotlin DSLs, which is `apply from:` (or it's slightly different Kotlin syntax). The start of the script identifies which of the two approaches is being used by checking if the binding is set, and then initializes some variables differently depending on the case.
If we land this, I believe we should update the example Gradle files for both the `kts` and `groovy` cases to prefer the `apply from` syntax as I think this is the syntax most developers would be more familiar with already seeing in their Gradle files.
Now that Flutter requires AGP 7+, we can use Java 11 as the compatibility version in the plugin template rather than 1.8, avoiding warnings with newer toolchains, and we can remove the check for 'namespace' existing that was only necessary to support AGP 4.1.
See also https://github.com/flutter/packages/pull/7795 which made this change in Flutter-team-owned plugins.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/156111
Migrates existing instantions of `--template plugin_ffi` to deal with Android 15 16kb memory pages.
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155933
@reidbaker I could only find migrations that run from the root application. However the file needing to be migrated is a plugin. The plugin is being referenced from the example in the example dir and that's where the migrator is run, so I wrote the code so that it walks up to find the plugin. Do you know of a way to run migrators to non-root projects? (Can we even safely do so, e.g. the non-root could be in the pub cache, could be a different project on the users' system etc. So maybe checking if we are in the examples dir is the only sane thing to do?)
Tests:
* Added unit tests in `test/general.shard/android/migrations/cmake_android_16k_pages_migration_test.dart`
Android 15 support 16k page sizes, it need [enable 16kb elf alignment](https://developer.android.com/guide/practices/page-sizes#compile-r26-lower).
the current plugin_ffi template will have below error if run on android 15 16k emulator
```
Failed to load dynamic library 'libffigen_app.so': dlopen
failed: empty/missing
DT_HASH/DT_GNU_HASH in
"/data/app/~~Ixsgxu2mj5fKxP1cXpjV6Q==/com.example.ffigen_app_example-6d_efR__WGu
4dsF4tLIaHw==/lib/arm64/libffigen_app.so"
(new hash type from the future?)
```
Rolls native deps to the latest version, and cleans up deprecated field from template.
Tests:
* All the unit and integration tests for native assets. The template and dependencies are exercised in the integration test.
Since `package:native_assets_builder` already checks for having no static libraries as output, the custom check in flutter_tools is removed. The tests stubbing out the native assets builder exercising the custom check are also removed. (The integration tests now check for the error message from the native assets builder.)
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/151675 bumped module templates to AGP 8.1.
In doing so, I tried to work around a behavior change [that was new in AGP 8.0](https://developer.android.com/build/releases/past-releases/agp-8-0-0-release-notes):
> AGP 8.0 creates no SoftwareComponent by default. Instead AGP creates SoftwareComponents only for variants that are configured to be published using the publishing DSL.
by using AGP's publishing DSL to define which variants to publish in the module's ephemeral gradle files:
```
android.buildTypes.all {buildType ->
if (!android.productFlavors.isEmpty()) {
android.productFlavors.all{productFlavor ->
android.publishing.singleVariant(productFlavor.name + buildType.name.capitalize()) {
withSourcesJar()
withJavadocJar()
}
}
} else {
android.publishing.singleVariant(buildType.name) {
withSourcesJar()
withJavadocJar()
}
}
}
```
The problem is that this doesn't get applied to the plugin projects used by the module, so if a module uses any plugin it breaks. This PR fixes that by applying similar logic, but to each project (not just the module's project).
Tested manually with https://github.com/gmackall/GrayAddToApp, and also re-enabled an old test that tested this use case as a part of the PR.
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/154371
Reverts: flutter/flutter#152487
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: I forgot that I need to override the compileSdkVersion in the AGP 8.0 [instance of this test](ef9cd32f5a/dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/android_java17_dependency_smoke_tests.dart (L19))
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
Opening a Swift package in Xcode generates `.build` and `.swiftpm` directories. These should be ignored as they contain intermediary build artifacts that aren't meant to be checked-in.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148018
Stop running link hooks in debug mode.
Rationale: link hooks only get access to tree-shaking info in release builds, so they can't do anything meaningful in debug builds. Debug builds should be fast as development cycle, so running less is better.
More details:
* https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/1252
Also: rolls packages to latest versions.
## Implementation details
The decision whether linking is enabled is made as follows:
* For normal builds `build_info.dart::BuildMode` is used to determine whether Dart is compiled in JIT or AOT mode.
* Testers always run in JIT, so no linking.
* Native asset dry runs only run for JIT builds (e.g only when hot reload and hot restart are enabled).
## Testing
The integration test is updated to output an asset for linking if `BuildConfig.linkingEnabled` is true, and to output an asset for bundling directly if linking is not enabled.
PR to pave the way for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53001 to re-land
Summary:
- Enforces use of Kotlin >= `1.7.0` (please see below note)
- Fixes ci failures that prevented the above PR from landing.
Details:
Because it landed initially, we are able to fake the roll in this PR to fix all the tests ([see my comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149204#discussion_r1617924772)).
Fixes all the tests that failed:
1. `module_test` failing on multiple platforms (3/9 of the failures).
Failure is
```
> Android resource linking failed
ERROR:/b/s/w/ir/x/t/flutter_module_test.KECMXW/hello/.android/plugins_build_output/device_info/intermediates/merged_res/release/values/values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.
```
This is a rather unhelpful error message but some [folks online suggest](https://stackoverflow.com/a/69050529) that upgrading your `compileSdk` version fixes this.
These resolve when I remove the dependency on the long discontinued [package_info](https://pub.dev/packages/package_info) and [device_info](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info) packages, perhaps because they are transitively pulling in low `compileSdk` versions? This is unclear to me.
2. `module_custom_host_app_name_test` was failing for the same reason (another 3/9, or cumulative 6/9).
3. `tool_integration_tests_3_4` was a flake ð (7/9)
4. `framework_tests_slow` needed a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin (the flutter tool tells us this, so I just upgraded as suggested) and it resolved (8/9)
5.`android_preview_tool_integration_tests` needed newer AGP and KGP versions. I also refactored the tests, and bumped our error versions, fixing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142653.
**Note that the bump to KGP is not in line with our policy** - we didn't warn for `1.5.0-1.6.x` for a release (or at all) before dropping support. But I think it might still be justified:
- The bump to our androidx libraries unblocks ongoing Scribe work, and also includes a fix for a [memory leak](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129307#issuecomment-1601636959) and a [crash on folding phones](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/114868#issuecomment-2133226962), among many other bug fixes.
- Gradle [doesn't test on half of that range](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#kotlin), and so we implicitly can't claim to support it either. More generally, our Java and Kotlin support ranges should probably strictly fall within what Gradle tests.
This PR adds support invoking `link.dart` hooks.
Link hooks can add new assets. Link hooks can transform assets sent to link hook from build hooks.
This PR does not yet add support for getting tree-shake information in the link hooks. This is pending on defining the `resources.json` format (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/55494).
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146263
## Implementation considerations
The build hooks could be run before Dart compilation and the link hooks after Dart compilation. (This is how it's done in Dart standalone.) However, due to the way the `Target`s are set up, this would require two targets and serializing and deserializing the `BuildResult` in between these. This would lead to more code but no benefits. Currently there is nothing that mandates running build hooks before Dart compilation.
## Testing
* The unit tests verify that the native_assets_builder `link` and `linkDryRun` would be invoked with help of the existing fake.
* The native assets integration test now also invokes an FFI call of a package that adds the asset during the link hook instead of the build hook.
* In order to keep coverage of the `flutter create --template=package_ffi`, `flutter create` is still run and the extra dependency is added and an extra ffi call is added. (Open to alternative suggestions.)
Adds an empty privacy manifest, and commented out code to include it in the build, to the plugin template. This will make it much easier to explain how to add a privacy manifest in plugin docs, since instead of explaining the format of the file from scratch and providing example code to inculde it, we can just instruct people to add entries to an exisitng file and then uncomment a line or two. This will also make it much easier to figure out from the template output itself how to add support for people who don't find the documentation.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131940
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140013
When Swift Package Manager feature is enabled, create app and create plugin will have Swift Package Manager integration already added and will not need to undergo a migration.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146371.
```
flutter config --enable-swift-package-manager
flutter create --ios-language swift --platforms ios,macos swift_app_name
flutter create --ios-language objc --platforms ios objc_app_name
flutter create --template=plugin --ios-language swift --platforms ios,macos swift_plugin_name
flutter create --template=plugin --ios-language objc --platforms ios objc_plugin_name
```
