This auto-formats all *.dart files in the repository outside of the
`engine` subdirectory and enforces that these files stay formatted with
a presubmit check.
**Reviewers:** Please carefully review all the commits except for the
one titled "formatted". The "formatted" commit was auto-generated by
running `dev/tools/format.sh -a -f`. The other commits were hand-crafted
to prepare the repo for the formatting change. I recommend reviewing the
commits one-by-one via the "Commits" tab and avoiding Github's "Files
changed" tab as it will likely slow down your browser because of the
size of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kate Lovett <katelovett@google.com>
Co-authored-by: LongCatIsLooong <31859944+LongCatIsLooong@users.noreply.github.com>
Work towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/56591.
I explicitly want an LGTM from @andrewkolos @jmagman @jonahwilliams before merging.
---
After this PR, `<Plugin>.isDevDependency` is resolved based on the following logic, IFF:
- The plugin comes from a package _A_ listed in the app's package's `dev_dependencies: ...`
- The package _A_ is not a normal dependency of any transitive non-dev dependency of the app
See [`compute_dev_dependencies_test.dart`](51676093a3/packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/compute_dev_dependencies_test.dart) for probably the best specification of this behavior.
We (still) do not write the property to disk (i.e. it never makes it to `.flutter-plugins-dependencies`), so there is no impact to build artifacts at this time; that would come in a follow-up PR (and then follow-up follow-up PRs for the various build systems in both Gradle and Xcode to actually use that value to omit dependencies).
Some tests had to be updated; for the most part it was updating the default `ProcessManager` because a call to `dart pub deps --json` is now made in code that computes what plugins are available, but there should be no change in behavior.
_/cc @jonasfj @sigurdm for FYI only (we talked on an internal thread about this; see https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/56968)._
_/cc @camsim99 @cbracken @johnmccutchan for visibility on the change._
This PR introduces the `dartFileName` parameter for platform plugin configurations with Dart platform implementations. This new parameter allows plugin developers to specify a custom path to the file where the `dartPluginClass` is defined.
**Implementation is opt-in**. `dartFileName` is completely optional and is taken in account only with `dartClassName`. Possibility to set `dartClassName` without `dartFileName` remains.
**Implementation is backward compatible** â existing configurations using only `dartClassName` remain fully supported. If `dartFileName` is omitted, the system falls back to the previous behavior of deriving the file name from the plugin name.
## Example
```yaml
flutter:
plugin:
platforms:
some_platform:
dartPluginClass: MyPlugin
dartFileName: 'src/my_plugin_implementation.dart'
```
fixes#152833
Windows plugins are designed to share implementations between Win32 and
UWP, but not all plugins will support both. This adds a new
'supportedVariants' key to Windows plugins that allows specifying
'win32' and/or 'uwp' (and potentially others in the future in case that
becomes necessary).
Plugins without any supported variants will be assumed to be Win32 for
backward compatibility.
This will allow compiling Windows projects that use Win32-only Windows
plugins (which is currently all of them) in UWP mode. The plugins will
of course throw missing implementation exceptions at runtime, but tehy
won't prevent being able to build as they currently do.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/82815
