* Adds support for `flutter test --wasm`.
* The test compilation flow is a bit different now, so that it supports compilers other than DDC. Specifically, when we run a set of unit tests, we generate a "switchboard" main function that imports each unit test and runs the main function for a specific one based off of a value set by the JS bootstrapping code. This way, there is one compile step and the same compile output is invoked for each unit test file.
* Also, removes all references to `dart:html` from flutter/flutter.
* Adds CI steps for running the framework unit tests with dart2wasm+skwasm
* These steps are marked as `bringup: true`, so we don't know what kind of failures they will result in. Any failures they have will not block the tree at all yet while we're still in `bringup: true`. Once this PR is merged, I plan on looking at any failures and either fixing them or disabling them so we can get these CI steps running on presubmit.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126692
Reverts: flutter/flutter#144706
Initiated by: gspencergoog
Reason for reverting: This has broken the tree because some tests are still failing post completion. This particular one looks like it might have to do with a gold image not existing.
Original PR Author: goderbauer
Reviewed By: {Piinks}
This change reverts the following previous change:
A test was failing silently because of this (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144353 and fixed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144709). The failure went undetected for months. Ideally, this should have been a regular non-silent failure. This change makes that so. `package:test` can properly handle reported exceptions outside of test cases. With this change, the test fails as follows:
```
00:03 +82: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
══╡ EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY FLUTTER TEST FRAMEWORK ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following assertion was thrown running a test (but after the test had completed):
setState() called after dispose(): _DynamicColorExampleState#1cd37(lifecycle state: defunct, not
mounted)
This error happens if you call setState() on a State object for a widget that no longer appears in
the widget tree (e.g., whose parent widget no longer includes the widget in its build). This error
can occur when code calls setState() from a timer or an animation callback.
The preferred solution is to cancel the timer or stop listening to the animation in the dispose()
callback. Another solution is to check the "mounted" property of this object before calling
setState() to ensure the object is still in the tree.
This error might indicate a memory leak if setState() is being called because another object is
retaining a reference to this State object after it has been removed from the tree. To avoid memory
leaks, consider breaking the reference to this object during dispose().
When the exception was thrown, this was the stack:
#0 State.setState.<anonymous closure> (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1167:9)
#1 State.setState (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1202:6)
#2 _DynamicColorExampleState._updateImage (package:flutter_api_samples/material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart:191:5)
<asynchronous suspension>
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/context_menu/context_menu_controller.0.dart
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart [E]
Test failed. See exception logs above.
The test description was: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
This test failed after it had already completed.
Make sure to use a matching library which informs the test runner
of pending async work.
```
A test was failing silently because of this (see
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144353 and fixed in
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144709). The failure went
undetected for months. Ideally, this should have been a regular
non-silent failure. This change makes that so. `package:test` can
properly handle reported exceptions outside of test cases. With this
change, the test fails as follows:
```
00:03 +82: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
══╡ EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY FLUTTER TEST FRAMEWORK ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following assertion was thrown running a test (but after the test had completed):
setState() called after dispose(): _DynamicColorExampleState#1cd37(lifecycle state: defunct, not
mounted)
This error happens if you call setState() on a State object for a widget that no longer appears in
the widget tree (e.g., whose parent widget no longer includes the widget in its build). This error
can occur when code calls setState() from a timer or an animation callback.
The preferred solution is to cancel the timer or stop listening to the animation in the dispose()
callback. Another solution is to check the "mounted" property of this object before calling
setState() to ensure the object is still in the tree.
This error might indicate a memory leak if setState() is being called because another object is
retaining a reference to this State object after it has been removed from the tree. To avoid memory
leaks, consider breaking the reference to this object during dispose().
When the exception was thrown, this was the stack:
#0 State.setState.<anonymous closure> (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1167:9)
#1 State.setState (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1202:6)
#2 _DynamicColorExampleState._updateImage (package:flutter_api_samples/material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart:191:5)
<asynchronous suspension>
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/context_menu/context_menu_controller.0.dart
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart [E]
Test failed. See exception logs above.
The test description was: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
This test failed after it had already completed.
Make sure to use a matching library which informs the test runner
of pending async work.
```
Reverts flutter/flutter#143244
Initiated by: vashworth
Reason for reverting: Increased `flutter_framework_uncompressed_bytes` - see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144251
Original PR Author: vashworth
Reviewed By: {jmagman}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Replace `FlutterMacOS.framework` cached artifact with `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`. Also, update usage of `FlutterMacOS.framework` to use `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126016.
Replace `FlutterMacOS.framework` cached artifact with `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`. Also, update usage of `FlutterMacOS.framework` to use `FlutterMacOS.xcframework`.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126016.
On the beta branch:
```
Verifying the code signature of /Users/m/Projects/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios-profile/extension_safe/Flutter.xcframework
Verifying the code signature of /Users/m/Projects/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios-profile/Flutter.xcframework
Verifying the code signature of /Users/m/Projects/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios/extension_safe/Flutter.xcframework
Verifying the code signature of /Users/m/Projects/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios/Flutter.xcframework
Verifying the code signature of /Users/m/Projects/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios-release/extension_safe/Flutter.xcframework
Verifying the code signature of /Users/m/Projects/flutter/bin/cache/artifacts/engine/ios-release/Flutter.xcframework
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140934
- Unskip `text_style_test` for CanvasKit.
- Remove no longer necessary `kIsWeb` checks in a few tests.
This PR depends on https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/49786, which rolled into the framework. If the engine PR needs to be reverted, this PR will need to be reverted too.
The migration of customer tests to sharded tests adds a step that checks out the current tip-of-tree of the framework repo, removing local changes. This does not work with monorepo testing, which modifies engine.version, and does not work with local testing of a branch.
The sharded tests should already be running with the correct checkout of the framework repo. If the REVISION environment variable is set, the framework checkout will still be reset to check out that revision.
These commands were migrated from the existing shell script to the sharded tester in
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/138659
Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/51042
Fix and unskip the following CanvasKit tests:
- `test/painting/decoration_test.dart`
- `test/rendering/layers_test.dart`
- `test/widgets/app_overrides_test.dart`
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/138253 demonstrated that the tests for the textures example weren't actually running on CI. This changes the testing script to execute the tests for everything inside the `examples` directory.
## Description
This PR adds a `nonce` parameter to flutter.js' `loadEntrypoint` method.
When set, loadEntrypoint will add a `nonce` attribute to the `main.dart.js` script tag, which allows Flutter to run in environments slightly more restricted by CSP; those that don't add `'self'` as a valid source for `script-src`.
----
### CSP directive
After this change, the CSP directive for a Flutter Web index.html can be:
```
script-src 'nonce-YOUR_NONCE_VALUE' 'wasm-unsafe-eval';
font-src https://fonts.gstatic.com;
style-src 'nonce-YOUR_NONCE_VALUE';
```
When CSP is set via a `meta` tag (like in the test accompanying this change), and to use a service worker, the CSP needs an additional directive: [`worker-src 'self';`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Security-Policy/worker-src)
When CSP set via response headers, the CSP that applies to `flutter_service_worker.js` is determined by its response headers. See **Web Workers API > [Content security policy](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Workers_API/Using_web_workers#content_security_policy)** in MDN.)
----
### Initialization
If the CSP is set to disallow `script-src 'self'`, a nonce needs to also be passed to `loadEntrypoint`:
```javascript
_flutter.loader.loadEntrypoint({
nonce: 'SOME_NONCE',
onEntrypointLoaded: (engineInitializer) async {
const appRunner = await engineInitializer.initializeEngine({
nonce: 'SOME_NONCE',
});
appRunner.runApp();
},
});
```
(`nonce` shows twice for now, because the entrypoint loader script doesn't have direct access to the `initializeEngine` call.)
----
## Tests
* Added a smoke test to ensure an app configured as described above starts.
## Issues
* Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126977
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue.*
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/128381
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/89683.
The changes to `getFlutterView` in `FlutterDeviceScreenshot` are the fix that was required, everything else was done to get tests running (such as re-generating some lockfiles and modifying the android manifest).
The code was all currently not unit tested, and there were no other easy examples to base these java unit tests off in flutter/flutter, so let me know if this approach to testing is wrong.
Migrate tests in flutter/flutter. Once the tests here and in `*_customer_testing` are migrated, the default value of the migration flag will be changed from false to true, making the rounding hack disabled by default.
Context: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131862
This PR injects a "realm" component to the storage base URL when the contents of the file `bin/internal/engine.realm` is non-empty.
As documented in the PR, when the realm is `flutter_archives_v2`, and `bin/internal/engine.version` contains the commit hash for a commit in a `flutter/engine` PR, then the artifacts pulled by the tool will be the artifacts built by the presubmit checks for the PR.
This works for everything but the following two cases:
1. Fuchsia artifacts are not uploaded to CIPD by the Fuchsia presubmit builds.
2. Web artifacts are not uploaded to gstatic by the web engine presubmit builds.
For (1), the flutter/flutter presubmit `fuchsia_precache` is driven by a shell script outside of the repo. It will fail when the `engine.version` and `engine.realm` don't point to a post-submit engine commit.
For (2), the flutter/flutter web presubmit tests that refer to artifacts in gstatic hang when the artifacts aren't found, so this PR skips them.
Add the `--downgrade` flag to the flutter/packages analyze test, so that it won't get the latest version of dependencies, avoiding out-of-band failures in flutter/flutter due to package publishing events.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129633
This change enables Flutter to generate multiple Scenes to be rendered into separate FlutterViews from a single widget tree. Each Scene is described by a separate render tree, which are all associated with the single widget tree.
This PR implements the framework-side mechanisms to describe the content to be rendered into multiple views. Separate engine-side changes are necessary to provide these views to the framework and to draw the framework-generated Scene into them.
## Summary of changes
The details of this change are described in [flutter.dev/go/multiple-views](https://flutter.dev/go/multiple-views). Below is a high-level summary organized by layers.
### Rendering layer changes
* The `RendererBinding` no longer owns a single `renderView`. In fact, it doesn't OWN any `RenderView`s at all anymore. Instead, it offers an API (`addRenderView`/`removeRenderView`) to add and remove `RenderView`s that then will be MANAGED by the binding. The `RenderView` itself is now owned by a higher-level abstraction (e.g. the `RawView` Element of the widgets layer, see below), who is also in charge of adding it to the binding. When added, the binding will interact with the `RenderView` to produce a frame (e.g. by calling `compositeFrame` on it) and to perform hit tests for incoming pointer events. Multiple `RenderView`s can be added to the binding (typically one per `FlutterView`) to produce multiple Scenes.
* Instead of owning a single `pipelineOwner`, the `RendererBinding` now owns the root of the `PipelineOwner` tree (exposed as `rootPipelineOwner` on the binding). Each `PipelineOwner` in that tree (except for the root) typically manages its own render tree typically rooted in one of the `RenderView`s mentioned in the previous bullet. During frame production, the binding will instruct each `PipelineOwner` of that tree to flush layout, paint, semantics etc. A higher-level abstraction (e.g. the widgets layer, see below) is in charge of adding `PipelineOwner`s to this tree.
* Backwards compatibility: The old `renderView` and `pipelineOwner` properties of the `RendererBinding` are retained, but marked as deprecated. Care has been taken to keep their original behavior for the deprecation period, i.e. if you just call `runApp`, the render tree bootstrapped by this call is rooted in the deprecated `RendererBinding.renderView` and managed by the deprecated `RendererBinding.pipelineOwner`.
### Widgets layer changes
* The `WidgetsBinding` no longer attaches the widget tree to an existing render tree. Instead, it bootstraps a stand-alone widget tree that is not backed by a render tree. For this, `RenderObjectToWidgetAdapter` has been replaced by `RootWidget`.
* Multiple render trees can be bootstrapped and attached to the widget tree with the help of the `View` widget, which internally is backed by a `RawView` widget. Configured with a `FlutterView` to render into, the `RawView` creates a new `PipelineOwner` and a new `RenderView` for the new render tree. It adds the new `RenderView` to the `RendererBinding` and its `PipelineOwner` to the pipeline owner tree.
* The `View` widget can only appear in certain well-defined locations in the widget tree since it bootstraps a new render tree and does not insert a `RenderObject` into an ancestor. However, almost all Elements expect that their children insert `RenderObject`s, otherwise they will not function properly. To produce a good error message when the `View` widget is used in an illegal location, the `debugMustInsertRenderObjectIntoSlot` method has been added to Element, where a child can ask whether a given slot must insert a RenderObject into its ancestor or not. In practice, the `View` widget can be used as a child of the `RootWidget`, inside the `view` slot of the `ViewAnchor` (see below) and inside a `ViewCollection` (see below). In those locations, the `View` widget may be wrapped in other non-RenderObjectWidgets (e.g. InheritedWidgets).
* The new `ViewAnchor` can be used to create a side-view inside a parent `View`. The `child` of the `ViewAnchor` widget renders into the parent `View` as usual, but the `view` slot can take on another `View` widget, which has access to all inherited widgets above the `ViewAnchor`. Metaphorically speaking, the view is anchored to the location of the `ViewAnchor` in the widget tree.
* The new `ViewCollection` widget allows for multiple sibling views as it takes a list of `View`s as children. It can be used in all the places that accept a `View` widget.
## Google3
As of July 5, 2023 this change passed a TAP global presubmit (TGP) in google3: tap/OCL:544707016:BASE:545809771:1688597935864:e43dd651
## Note to reviewers
This change is big (sorry). I suggest focusing the initial review on the changes inside of `packages/flutter` first. The majority of the changes describe above are implemented in (listed in suggested review order):
* `rendering/binding.dart`
* `widgets/binding.dart`
* `widgets/view.dart`
* `widgets/framework.dart`
All other changes included in the PR are basically the fallout of what's implemented in those files. Also note that a lot of the lines added in this PR are documentation and tests.
I am also very happy to walk reviewers through the code in person or via video call, if that is helpful.
I appreciate any feedback.
## Feedback to address before submitting ("TODO")
## FlutterTimeline
Add a new class `FlutterTimeline` that's a drop-in replacement for `Timeline` from `dart:developer`. In addition to forwarding invocations of `startSync`, `finishSync`, `timeSync`, and `instantSync` to `dart:developer`, provides the following extra methods that make is easy to collect timings for code blocks on a frame-by-frame basis:
* `debugCollect()` - aggregates timings since the last reset, or since the app launched.
* `debugReset()` - forgets all data collected since the previous reset, or since the app launched. This allows clearing data from previous frames so timings can be attributed to the current frame.
* `now` - this was enhanced so that it works on the web by calling `window.performance.now` (in `Timeline` this is a noop in Dart web compilers).
* `collectionEnabled` - a field that controls whether `FlutterTimeline` stores timings in memory. By default this is disabled to avoid unexpected overhead (although the class is designed for minimal and predictable overhead). Specific benchmarks can enable collection to report to Skia Perf.
## Semantics benchmarks
Add `BenchMaterial3Semantics` that benchmarks the cost of semantics when constructing a screen full of Material 3 widgets from nothing. It is expected that semantics will have non-trivial cost in this case, but we should strive to keep it much lower than the rendering cost. This is the case already. This benchmark shows that the cost of semantics is <10%.
Add `BenchMaterial3ScrollSemantics` that benchmarks the cost of scrolling a previously constructed screen full of Material 3 widgets. The expectation should be that semantics will have trivial cost, since we're just shifting some widgets around. As of today, the numbers are not great, with semantics taking >50% of frame time, which is what prompted this PR in the first place. As we optimize this, we want to see this number improve.
Automatic CI testing runs on monorepo bots that tests the heads
of the Dart SDK, Flutter engine, and Flutter framework together.
These tests previously ran on bots called HHH (triple-headed),
and the logic for detecting this used the machine name of the test machine.
Extend that detection logic to cover the test machine hostnames that
run monorepo testing, that start with either 'dart-tests-' or 'luci-dart-'.
None of the machines used to run Flutter release builds have names
like this, even though they are in an internal Dart luci project.
Bug: b/231927187
1. Add iOS and macOS migration to mark "last upgraded" Xcode version to 14.3 to prevent `Update to recommended settings` warning.
2. Update iOS and macOS templates to same.
3. Update iOS template to set `BuildIndependentTargetsInParallel` to YES as suggested. I didn't add a migration for this since it seems like a minor optimization and I don't think it's worth a potentially botched/corrupted migration.
4. Run all example/integration test project to see migrator work.
5. Add some missing test projects to the build shard since I noticed they were missing and I had to build those manually outside `SHARD=build_tests`.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/125817
See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/90304 for Xcode 13 example.
