I've updated these two examples to support state restoration of the navigation stack and verified that they work with predictive back in the tests. This was motivated by a worry that users are not properly setting up their navigation and that our examples are misleading them in the name of simplicity.
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/widgets/single_child_scroll_view/single_child_scroll_view.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/widgets/single_child_scroll_view/single_child_scroll_view.1.dart`
I also fixed a mistake in the documentation
Move `scroll_direction.0_test.dart` & `growth_direction.0_test.dart` to same directory structure as the example files.
Tests were already present, only had to move them & remove the entries from the missing tests.
Part of #130459
This PR is aimed at (1) reducing the private API surface of _MenuAnchorState to make migration into RawMenuAnchor simpler, and (2) fixing focus-related bugs.
Directional focus handling was moved from MenuAnchor (_MenuDirectionalFocusAction, _MenuNextFocusAction, and _MenuPreviousFocusAction) into SubmenuButton (_SubmenuDirectionalFocusAction). MenuAnchor now behaves similarly to a flat FocusScope, which makes it easier to customize. A future PR will ideally expose or remove the remaining internals (_lastItemFocusNode, _firstItemFocusNode, _isRoot, etc). All previous framework tests are passing, and additional tests were added for fixes (MenuAnchor tab traversal, reopened menus not being focusable), and to test MenuAnchor focus behavior separately from MenuBar.
However, [one example test](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150950/files#diff-a33fa01b59d280784e7c8ed6b704bd005cde95b7d3b649dc82fd58530061a09d) had to be changed. I'm not sure why the previous example test was working to begin with, as submenu buttons are supposed to open on focus, but this behavior was not observed in the original test.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144381, https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150334.
One added feature is the ability to move between top-level horizontal submenus if a horizontal movement is made on a vertical menu item that has no children in the movement direction. This behavior was observed on Google Docs, MacOS, and various other menu systems I encountered.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/59215665/04a42b8a-cc9e-4a50-9d0c-6f2d784cfc78
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger_state.show_snack_bar.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger_state.show_material_banner.0.dart`
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/search_anchor/search_anchor.1.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/search_anchor/search_anchor.2.dart`
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger.of.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold_messenger.of.1.dart`
A relatively elaborate PinnedSliverHeader example which creates an app bar that's similar to the one that appears in the iOS Settings app. In this example the pinned header starts out transparent and the first item in the list serves as the app's "Settings" title. When the title item has been scrolled completely behind the pinned header, the header animates its opacity from 0 to 1 and its (centered) "Settings" title appears. The fact that the header's opacity depends on the height of the title item - which is unknown until the list has been laid out - necessitates monitoring its SliverConstraints.scrollExtent from a scroll NotificationListener.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/1377460/539e2591-d0d7-4508-8ce8-4b8f587d7648
A sliver that shows its [child] when the user scrolls forward and hides it when the user scrolls backwards. Similar headers can be found in Google Photos and Facebook.
This sliver is preferable to the general purpose SliverPersistentHeader for its relatively narrow use case because there's no need to create a SliverPersistentHeaderDelegate or to predict the header's size.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/1377460/82b67dfb-5d38-4adf-9415-fc8527d0eb9f
Adds a new ScrollNotificationEnd example that demonstrates how to trigger an auto-scroll based on an individual sliver's `SliverConstraints` and `SliverGeometry`.
Then new example auto-scrolls one special "aligned item" sliver to the top or bottom of the viewport, whenever it's partially visible (because it overlaps the top or bottom of the viewport). This example differs from the existing ScrollEndNotification example because the layout of the to-be aligned sliver is retrieved from its `RenderSliver` via a
GlobalKey. The new example does not rely on all of the list items having the same extent.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150481
Initiated by: cbracken
Reason for reverting: Surprisingly, the following test seems to be consistently failing on Windows after the addition of this test:
```
flutter/packages/flutter/test/widgets/sliver_tree_test.dart: .toggleNodeWith, onNodeToggle
```
Original PR Author: ValentinVignal
Reviewed By: {TahaTesser, bleroux}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/text_form_field/text_form_field.1.dart`
Add tests for `InputDecoration` API example as part of #130459. Updates examples that use the deprecated MaterialState to use WidgetState. Tests files: `input_decoration.0.dart`, `input_decoration.1.dart`, `input_decoration.2.dart`, `input_decoration.3.dart`, `input_decoration.widget_state.0.dart`, `input_decoration.widget_state.1.dart`, `input_decoration.prefix_icon_constraints.0.dart`, `input_decoration.suffix_icon_constraints.0.dart`, and `input_decoration.label.0.dart`
Introducing the `forceErrorText` property to both `FormField` and `TextFormField`. With this addition, we gain the capability to trigger an error state and provide an error message without invoking the `validator` method.
While the idea of making the `Validator` method work asynchronously may be appealing, it could introduce significant complexity to our current form field implementation. Additionally, this approach might not be suitable for all developers, as discussed by @justinmc in this [comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/56414#issuecomment-624960263).
This PR try to address this issue by adding `forceErrorText` property allowing us to force the error to the `FormField` or `TextFormField` at our own base making it possible to preform some async operations without the need for any hacks while keep the ability to check for errors if we call `formKey.currentState!.validate()`.
Here is an example:
<details> <summary>Code Example</summary>
```dart
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
void main() {
runApp(
const MaterialApp(home: MyHomePage()),
);
}
class MyHomePage extends StatefulWidget {
const MyHomePage({
super.key,
});
@override
State<MyHomePage> createState() => _MyHomePageState();
}
class _MyHomePageState extends State<MyHomePage> {
final key = GlobalKey<FormState>();
String? forcedErrorText;
Future<void> handleValidation() async {
// simulate some async work..
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 3));
setState(() {
forcedErrorText = 'this username is not available.';
});
// wait for build to run and then check.
//
// this is not required though, as the error would already be showing.
WidgetsBinding.instance.addPostFrameCallback((_) {
print(key.currentState!.validate());
});
}
@override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
print('build');
return Scaffold(
floatingActionButton: FloatingActionButton(onPressed: handleValidation),
body: Form(
key: key,
child: Center(
child: Column(
mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center,
children: [
Padding(
padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 30),
child: TextFormField(
forceErrorText: forcedErrorText,
),
),
],
),
),
),
);
}
}
```
</details>
Related to #9688 & #56414.
Happy to hear your thoughts on this.
The widget under test already contains a MaterialApp, so there's no need to wrap it again with one in the test. In fact, the additional MaterialApp could hide problems in the widget under test.
## Description
This fixes the `ColorScheme` example to actually work. The test had wrapped the app in an additional `MaterialApp`, which allowed the tests to work, but the real problem was using a `context` that was outside the `MaterialApp` to open the bottom sheet, which caused an exception when you actually try to run it interactively.
This fixes the example and the test.
## Tests
- Fixed the test to not artificially add a second `MaterialApp`.
Contributes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130459
It adds a test for
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold.drawer.0.dart`
- `examples/api/lib/material/scaffold/scaffold.end_drawer.0.dart`
