<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169276
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: vashworth
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Causing google testing failures
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gaaclarke
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {vashworth}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
In extreme cases, like bespoke test harnesses, the startup logic can be
moved to `-[FlutterViewController awakeFromNib]` in a
FlutterViewController subclass.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/169276/files#diff-dbe39c23a0a380447b90b7559a878dae8564616e0875c4ef0d9e99e02b91adac
## Changes since revert
I changed the init in `//dev/integration_tests/external_textures` from
the UIApplicationDelegate to the FlutterViewController's awakeFromNib.
This is a more appropriate place for initialization post-UISceneDelegate
since it avoids the launch engine altogether. I tried avoiding to make
the big change to prove we could do a small change to migrate that
project. I don't think this big refactor is indicative of what users
will experience. There was a timing assumption in the integration test
that required not using the launch engine at all.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
In extreme cases, like bespoke test harnesses, the startup logic can be
moved to `-[FlutterViewController awakeFromNib]` in a
FlutterViewController subclass.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/169276/files#diff-dbe39c23a0a380447b90b7559a878dae8564616e0875c4ef0d9e99e02b91adac
## Changes since revert
I changed the init in `//dev/integration_tests/external_textures` from
the UIApplicationDelegate to the FlutterViewController's awakeFromNib.
This is a more appropriate place for initialization post-UISceneDelegate
since it avoids the launch engine altogether. I tried avoiding to make
the big change to prove we could do a small change to migrate that
project. I don't think this big refactor is indicative of what users
will experience. There was a timing assumption in the integration test
that required not using the launch engine at all.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This is solely a change to allow the CL for
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/59069 to land.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [ ] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#168914
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gaaclarke
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_ios%20external_ui_integration_test_ios/16792/overview
The external texture integration test is failing. Running the host app
appeared to work but one of the driver asserts isn't working.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gaaclarke
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {vashworth}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
## Changes since revert
Device lab tests have been migrated to using the FlutterPlugin API for
creating platform channels at process launch.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
## Changes since revert
Device lab tests have been migrated to using the FlutterPlugin API for
creating platform channels at process launch.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This PR is to make `BottomAppBarTheme` conform to Flutter Material's
conventions for component themes:
- Added a `BottomAppBarThemeData` class which defines overrides for the
defaults for `BottomAppBar` properties.
- Added `BottomAppBarTheme` constructor parameters:
`BottomAppBarThemeData? data` and `Widget? child`. This is now the
preferred way to configure a `BottomAppBarTheme`:
```dart
BottomAppBarTheme(
data: BottomAppBarThemeData(
color: xxx,
height: xxx,
elevation: xxx,
shape: xxx,
...
),
child: const BottomAppBar()
)
```
These two properties are made nullable to not break existing apps which
has customized `ThemeData.bottomAppBarTheme`.
- Update `BottomAppBarTheme` to be an `InheritedWidget` subclass.
- Changed the type of component theme defaults from `BottomAppBarTheme`
to `BottomAppBarThemeData`.
- Changed the `BottomAppBarTheme bottomAppBarTheme` property to
`BottomAppBarThemeData bottomAppBarTheme` in `ThemeData` and
`ThemeData.copyWith()`. This may cause breaking changes, a migration
guide will be created on website repo.
- Add new tests for `BottomAppBarThemeData` and update the existing
`BottomAppBarTheme` tests. And also turn to `true` for `useMaterial3`
(along with usages accordingly) at the common method `_withTheme()`
since `useMaterial3` is true by default.
- Addresses the "theme normalization" sub-project within #91772.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Signed-off-by: huycozy <huy@nevercode.io>
Roll packages to the ones published today.
Note that `native_assets_cli` was split up into `hooks` and
`code_assets`, and `native_assets_builder` was renamed to
`hooks_runner`.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161443
* adds a new gradle task like `javaVersion` named `kgpVersion` that
prints the version of kgp.
* adds gradle_utils.dart method for getting kgp version
* * kgp method is moved to utilities and we attempt to use a plugin
method before reflection.
* adds methods or evaluating KGP + gradle and KGP + AGP compatibility.
* * It turns out that we have been using incompatible versions that
happen to work with the subset of kotlin we are using.
* Uses new kgp methods in flutter analyze --suggestions as part of the
existing agp/java/gradle compatibility matrix.
* adds new tests for all new functionality
* Adds comments to sections of the code I found could use them.
* Modifies flutter gallery to use a compatible version of kotlin and
update its lockfiles.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [X] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Roll forward deps to the ones published today.
Note: `package:native_assets_cli` has a lower-bound on a Dart SDK dev
version to signal for which version of Dart and Flutter it is compatible
with. This means all these packages now have pre-release versions. Since
native assets is in experimental mode and not available on the
stable/beta branches, this is as expected.
Test exempt: Covered by existing tests, only rolling forward deps.
This PR is the dual of
https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/420700 in the Dart SDK.
This PR adds support for user-defines for hooks in the root package
`pubspec.yaml`.
```yaml
hooks:
user_defines:
hook_user_defines: # package name
magic_value: 1000
```
For more design considerations see:
* https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/39
### Testing
This PR is covered by
`test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart`.
In this PR, we add a new test project
`dev/integration_tests/hook_user_defines/` and add a dependency on that
project in the mentioned test.
The integration test already covers `flutter run`, `flutter test`, and
`flutter build`.
Updating the dart-lang/native dependencies to the ones published today.
No functional changes, but `CodeAsset` does not expose an `architecture`
and `os ` anymore (https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/2127).
Instead these should be taken from what is passed in for the
`CodeConfig`. This PR refactors the `DartBuildResult` to carry around
the `Target` with `CodeAsset`s as `FlutterCodeAsset`s.
(This PR avoid refactoring relevant code due to
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/164094 already refactoring this
code.)
Refactor: Migrate to Theme.brightnessOf method
fixes: #163837
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This reverts commit
8dccbc33df.
Find/replace didn't catch the use of `jvmTarget = "1.8"` in
`dev/integration_tests/android_engine_test/android/app/build.gradle` and
`android_engine_test` needed to have `"com.android.application"`
updated.
Should resolve issues related to the following messages being output on
stderr:
```
warning: [options] source value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release"
warning: [options] target value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release
warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use -Xlint:-options.
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165973
