## Description
This introduces a list of packages that we will explicitly not pin. It is to be used for things where the package isn't actually published, but is a transitive dependency of another package included in the SDK. This happens with the `macros` package, for instance, which depends on the private, unpublished, `_macros` package where the SDK does some tricky things to depend on it (it depends on "any", but ships it as part of the SDK).
Also ran `flutter update-packages --force-update` to update all of the pubspec files.
## Related Issues
- Fixes#147656
## Tests
- Added a test that makes sure that explicitly unpinned packages don't show up in the pinned list.
- added language for all code blocks
- replaced `bash` or `shell` with `sh` for consistency.
- added `sh` and `console` in the GitHub template link generator.
- updated test for GitHub template.
This PR adds initial support for Swift Package Manager (SPM). Users must opt in. Only compatible with Xcode 15+.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146369.
## Included Features
This PR includes the following features:
* Enabling SPM via config
`flutter config --enable-swift-package-manager`
* Disabling SPM via config (will disable for all projects)
`flutter config --no-enable-swift-package-manager`
* Disabling SPM via pubspec.yaml (will disable for the specific project)
```
flutter:
disable-swift-package-manager: true
```
* Migrating existing apps to add SPM integration if using a Flutter plugin with a Package.swift
* Generates a Swift Package (named `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage`) that handles Flutter SPM-compatible plugin dependencies. Generated package is added to the Xcode project.
* Error parsing of common errors that may occur due to using CocoaPods and Swift Package Manager together
* Tool will print warnings when using all Swift Package plugins and encourage you to remove CocoaPods
This PR also converts `integration_test` and `integration_test_macos` plugins to be both Swift Packages and CocoaPod Pods.
## How it Works
The Flutter CLI will generate a Swift Package called `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage`, which will have local dependencies on all Swift Package compatible Flutter plugins.
The `FlutterGeneratedPluginSwiftPackage` package will be added to the Xcode project via altering of the `project.pbxproj`.
In addition, a "Pre-action" script will be added via altering of the `Runner.xcscheme`. This script will invoke the flutter tool to copy the Flutter/FlutterMacOS framework to the `BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR` directory before the build starts. This is needed because plugins need to be linked to the Flutter framework and fortunately Swift Package Manager automatically uses `BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR` as a framework search path.
CocoaPods will continue to run and be used to support non-Swift Package compatible Flutter plugins.
## Not Included Features
It does not include the following (will be added in future PRs):
* Create plugin template
* Create app template
* Add-to-App integration
This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
Set<Color> _distinctVisibleColors() {
final Set<Color> distinctVisibleColors = <Color>{};
if (top.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(top.color);
}
if (right.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(right.color);
}
if (bottom.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(bottom.color);
}
if (left.style != BorderStyle.none) {
distinctVisibleColors.add(left.color);
}
return distinctVisibleColors;
}
// after
Set<Color> _distinctVisibleColors() {
return <Color>{
if (top.style != BorderStyle.none) top.color,
if (right.style != BorderStyle.none) right.color,
if (bottom.style != BorderStyle.none) bottom.color,
if (left.style != BorderStyle.none) left.color,
};
}
```
Most of the repo should be covered in this PR (aside from `flutter_tools/`, since there was a lot going on in there).
The interface for `ArgResults` from `package:args` has added new fields. Change the implementations of these in the conductor to extend `Fake` so that these aren't analyzer errors.
This broke the pub roll here: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146642#issuecomment-2050169629
This adds support for adding the `--wasm` flag to `flutter run` and `flutter drive`
* Emits errors if you attempt to use the skwasm renderer without the `--wasm` flag
* Emits errors if you try to use `--wasm` when not using a web device
* Uses the skwasm renderer by default if you pass `--wasm` and no `--web-renderer`
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51229 blocked [the roll](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146522) and had to be reverted, which is a shame, but on the bright side it made it possible to point the framework at my removal pr, at the point of its merging the first time
This fixes all errors that are fixable in the framework that would have blocked the roll. There are some that aren't fixable here (they need to be fixed in the engine)*, so I'll fix those in the engine but unfortunately I can't pick up another version here to re-test until I try to roll again ð¢
*This category is: uses of plugins that in turn have a `registerWith`, that references the v1 embedding. The plan to fix these cases is to leave the interface that that method relies on around for now. See https://github.com/flutter/packages/pull/6494#issuecomment-2046010323 for details
Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146181.
Just 3 commits:
1. a revert of the revert
2. the fix described in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146181#issuecomment-2038238869
3. updating two postsubmit tests from Java 11 to 17, as that is required for this new AGP version.
I've verified that `flutter build apk --flavor paid --debug` fails in `dev/integration_tests/flavors/` with the error in ci without (2), and succeeds with it.
I've also verified that the `dev/benchmarks/complex_layout` app builds successfully with Java 17.
That covers all the postsubmits that failed according [to the dashboard](https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#146181
Initiated by: LongCatIsLooong
Reason for reverting: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_android%20flavors_test_win/11086/overview
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, christopherfujino}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Bump almost all tests to AGP 8.1 and Gradle 8.3
Flutter gallery is excluded, because it uses discontinued plugins that in turn use old Gradle versions, and that prevents upgrading. Will take some extra work to figure out what to do there.
Should bump templates next
Entire PR generated with the lockfile generation script, except for:
1. changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/`, which must be done manually (and exclusion of the gallery for reason mentioned above).
2. Changes to many `AndroidManifest.xml` files to remove the `package` attribute and instead set that same value in the `build.gradle`, in the `namespace` attribute of the `android` closure (corresponds to an AGP behavior change, see https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace).
3. Removes the use of the `battery` plugin in `android_embedding_v2_smoke_test` because the plugin is discontinued, unused, and blocks upgrading the AGP version for that app because the discontinued plugin itself uses a very old AGP version.
Bump almost all tests to AGP 8.1 and Gradle 8.3
Flutter gallery is excluded, because it uses discontinued plugins that in turn use old Gradle versions, and that prevents upgrading. Will take some extra work to figure out what to do there.
Should bump templates next
Entire PR generated with the lockfile generation script, except for:
1. changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/`, which must be done manually (and exclusion of the gallery for reason mentioned above).
2. Changes to many `AndroidManifest.xml` files to remove the `package` attribute and instead set that same value in the `build.gradle`, in the `namespace` attribute of the `android` closure (corresponds to an AGP behavior change, see https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace).
3. Removes the use of the `battery` plugin in `android_embedding_v2_smoke_test` because the plugin is discontinued, unused, and blocks upgrading the AGP version for that app because the discontinued plugin itself uses a very old AGP version.
This PR is to update material_color_utilities package version to the latest. `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_fruit_salad.dart` and `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_rainbow.dart` are exported after version 0.9.0.
Once this PR is merged, we don't need to explicitly import these two files like the change in PR #144805, which breaks some dependencies in `Google testing`.
* Adds support for `flutter test --wasm`.
* The test compilation flow is a bit different now, so that it supports compilers other than DDC. Specifically, when we run a set of unit tests, we generate a "switchboard" main function that imports each unit test and runs the main function for a specific one based off of a value set by the JS bootstrapping code. This way, there is one compile step and the same compile output is invoked for each unit test file.
* Also, removes all references to `dart:html` from flutter/flutter.
* Adds CI steps for running the framework unit tests with dart2wasm+skwasm
* These steps are marked as `bringup: true`, so we don't know what kind of failures they will result in. Any failures they have will not block the tree at all yet while we're still in `bringup: true`. Once this PR is merged, I plan on looking at any failures and either fixing them or disabling them so we can get these CI steps running on presubmit.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126692
This allows relanding https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51056. The patch introduced a change where a static member is initialized from `View.generateViewId()` instead of conditionally using that API. Without an implementation for that in android.jar, the test will fail. The test in here currently is using a fake implementation that creates errors seen below.
See https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8754827734484522225/+/u/run_plugin_test/stdout#L46564_2 for failure. More detailed failure information is available locally in the `build` folder:
```
Mockito cannot mock this class: class io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity.
If you're not sure why you're getting this error, please open an issue on GitHub.
Java : 17
JVM vendor name : JetBrains s.r.o.
JVM vendor version : 17.0.7+0-17.0.7b1000.6-10550314
JVM name : OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
JVM version : 17.0.7+0-17.0.7b1000.6-10550314
JVM info : mixed mode
OS name : Mac OS X
OS version : 14.3.1
You are seeing this disclaimer because Mockito is configured to create inlined mocks.
You can learn about inline mocks and their limitations under item #39 of the Mockito class javadoc.
Underlying exception : org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: Cannot instrument class io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity because it or one of its supertypes could not be initialized
at app//dev.flutter.plugins.integration_test.FlutterDeviceScreenshotTest.getFlutterView_returnsFlutterViewForFlutterActivity(FlutterDeviceScreenshotTest.java:32)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at app//org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
at app//org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at app//org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
at app//org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at app//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
at app//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
at app//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.runTestClass(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:110)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:58)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:38)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.java:62)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.SuiteTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(SuiteTestClassProcessor.java:51)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ContextClassLoaderDispatch.dispatch(ContextClassLoaderDispatch.java:33)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:94)
at jdk.proxy1/jdk.proxy1.$Proxy2.processTestClass(Unknown Source)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker$2.run(TestWorker.java:176)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.executeAndMaintainThreadName(TestWorker.java:129)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:100)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:60)
at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.ActionExecutionWorker.execute(ActionExecutionWorker.java:56)
at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:133)
at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:71)
at app//worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.run(GradleWorkerMain.java:69)
at app//worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.main(GradleWorkerMain.java:74)
Caused by: org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: Cannot instrument class io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity because it or one of its supertypes could not be initialized
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:168)
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:399)
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:190)
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:410)
... 44 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Method generateViewId in android.view.View not mocked. See http://g.co/androidstudio/not-mocked for details.
at android.view.View.generateViewId(View.java)
at io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity.<clinit>(FlutterActivity.java:218)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineBytecodeGenerator.assureInitialization(InlineBytecodeGenerator.java:236)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineBytecodeGenerator.triggerRetransformation(InlineBytecodeGenerator.java:261)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineBytecodeGenerator.mockClass(InlineBytecodeGenerator.java:218)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.lambda$mockClass$0(TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.java:47)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:168)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:399)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:190)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:410)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.mockClass(TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.java:40)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.createMockType(InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.java:396)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.doCreateMock(InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.java:355)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.java:334)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(InlineByteBuddyMockMaker.java:56)
at org.mockito.internal.util.MockUtil.createMock(MockUtil.java:99)
at org.mockito.internal.MockitoCore.mock(MockitoCore.java:88)
at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:2087)
at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:2002)
... 44 more
```
Update dependencies to latest versions
Related to #142618Fixes#143219
- [ x I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
1. Remove `dev_target` from suggested Firebase Test Lab iOS script and use wildcard instead.
2. First run `flutter clean` before building to avoid collisions between runs.
3. Use `zip --must-match` in case the xctestrun or `Release-iphoneos` directories are missing (like ran with `--profile` instead of `--release` on purpose) to fail instead of zipping up only part of what's needed.
This came out of a discussion with FTL about these instructions and I tried to run them locally and avoided setting `dev_target`.
See also #74428
We already have a simple app in this repo that fully uses Gradle Kotlin DSL (see #141541). The next small step is to have at least one plugin that also uses Gradle Kotlin DSL. Let's use `integration_test` for that, since it's versioned with Flutter SDK.
Re-sets two jvmargs that were getting cleared because we set a value for `-Xmx`. Could help with https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142957. Copied from comment here https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142957:
>Two random things I ran into while looking into this that might help:
>
>1. Gradle has defaults for a couple of the jvmargs, and setting any one of them clears those defaults for the others (bug here https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/19750). This can cause the "Gradle daemon to consume more and more native memory until it crashes", though the bug typically has a different associated error. It seems worth it to re-set those defaults.
>2. There is a property we can set that will give us a heap dump on OOM ([-XX:HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/troubleshoot/clopts001.html))
Mostly just a find and replace from `find . -name gradle.properties -exec sed -i '' 's/\-Xmx4G/-Xmx4G\ \-XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=2G\ \-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError/g' {} \;`, with the templates and the one test that writes from a string replaced by hand. I didn't set a value for `MaxMetaspaceSize` in the template files because I want to make sure this value doesn't cause problems in ci first (changes to the templates are essentially un-revertable for those who `flutter create` while the changes exist).
This PR updates almost* all Gradle buildscripts in the Flutter repo the `example` and `dev` (in particular, in `dev/integration_tests` and in `dev/benchmarks`) directories to apply Flutter's Gradle plugins using the declarative `plugins {}` block.
*almost, because:
- add-to-app (aka hybrid) apps are not migrated (related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/138756)
- apps that purposefully use build files to ensure backward compatibility (e.g. [`gradle_deprecated_settings`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/tree/3.16.0/dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings))
This PR increases Android's `minSdkVersion` to 21.
There are two changes in this PR aside from simply increasing the number
from 19 to 21 everywhere.
First, tests using `flutter_gallery` fail without updating the
lockfiles. The changes in the PR are the results of running
`dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart` on that app.
Second, from
[here](https://developer.android.com/build/multidex#mdex-pre-l):
> if your minSdkVersion is 21 or higher, multidex is enabled by default
and you don't need the multidex library.
As a result, the `multidex` option everywhere is obsolete. This PR
removes all logic and tests related to that option that I could find.
`Google testing` and `customer_tests` pass on this PR, so it seems like
this won't be too breaking if it is at all. If needed I'll give this
some time to bake in the framework before landing the flutter/engine
PRs.
Context: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/138117,
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141277, b/319373605
Added missing required newline at end of some `.gitignore` files. All other `.gitignore` files ends with a newline except the changed ones, hence the PR.
> *List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
**Not listing any issues because of trivial fixes as mentioned above.**
Change the following in the `flutter create` templates. I didn't make any auto-migrations for existing apps because none seem that critical:
1. Turn on `ASSETCATALOG_COMPILER_GENERATE_SWIFT_ASSET_SYMBOL_EXTENSIONS` in iOS and macOS.
1. Turn on `BuildIndependentTargetsInParallel` in macOS template. https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/125827/files#r1181817619
1. Turn on `DEAD_CODE_STRIPPING` in macOS template.
1. Set `ENABLE_USER_SCRIPT_SANDBOXING=NO` in iOS and macOS template. `flutter` scripts don't work with this on. This might require a migration in the future to explicitly turn this one off. However at least for now if the setting isn't present it defaults to `NO`.
Add migration for `LastUpgradeVersion` so users won't see these validation issues in Xcode.
Run migrator on all the example apps. A few aren't Flutter apps so I edited them in Xcode.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140253
See also https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/125817 and https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/90304.
1. Move leak_tracker and leak_tracker_testing out of direct dependencies.
2. Move leak_tracker_flutter_testing from dev to prod dependencies for flutter_test
It is prerequisite for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/135856
Pinning the package:web dependency constrains downstream packages from
using newer versions and making sure they support the version pinned in
Flutter. Since the usage of package:web in Flutter is light, we should
instead have a small shim like the engine and keep package:web as a dev
dependency only.
This version is needed so that dart:js_interop can move to extension
types. Also adds some code to handle some breaking changes:
- Body -> Response. Body was an IDL interface mixin type we exposed in
dart:html. Going forward, users should either use Request or Response.
- Casts to JSAny. These are temporary until we move package:web types to
extension types. Currently, package:web types can't implement JSObject
as JSObject will move to be an extension type itself.
Co-authored-by: Kevin Moore <kevmoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts flutter/flutter#137191
Initiated by: camsim99
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Adds support for Android 34 in the following ways:
- Bumps integration tests compile SDK versions 33 --> 34
- Bumps template compile SDK version 33 --> 34
- Also changes deprecated `compileSdkVersion` to `compileSdk`
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134220
Adds support for Android 34 in the following ways:
- Bumps integration tests compile SDK versions 33 --> 34
- Bumps template compile SDK version 33 --> 34
- Also changes deprecated `compileSdkVersion` to `compileSdk`
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134220
Analyzer's dependency on autosnapshotting causes issues.
Because every version of integration_test from sdk depends on leak_tracker from hosted and autosnapshotting depends on leak_tracker from path, integration_test from sdk is forbidden.
So, because autosnapshotting depends on integration_test from sdk, version solving failed.
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue.*
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/128381
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/89683.
The changes to `getFlutterView` in `FlutterDeviceScreenshot` are the fix that was required, everything else was done to get tests running (such as re-generating some lockfiles and modifying the android manifest).
The code was all currently not unit tested, and there were no other easy examples to base these java unit tests off in flutter/flutter, so let me know if this approach to testing is wrong.
This change enables Flutter to generate multiple Scenes to be rendered into separate FlutterViews from a single widget tree. Each Scene is described by a separate render tree, which are all associated with the single widget tree.
This PR implements the framework-side mechanisms to describe the content to be rendered into multiple views. Separate engine-side changes are necessary to provide these views to the framework and to draw the framework-generated Scene into them.
## Summary of changes
The details of this change are described in [flutter.dev/go/multiple-views](https://flutter.dev/go/multiple-views). Below is a high-level summary organized by layers.
### Rendering layer changes
* The `RendererBinding` no longer owns a single `renderView`. In fact, it doesn't OWN any `RenderView`s at all anymore. Instead, it offers an API (`addRenderView`/`removeRenderView`) to add and remove `RenderView`s that then will be MANAGED by the binding. The `RenderView` itself is now owned by a higher-level abstraction (e.g. the `RawView` Element of the widgets layer, see below), who is also in charge of adding it to the binding. When added, the binding will interact with the `RenderView` to produce a frame (e.g. by calling `compositeFrame` on it) and to perform hit tests for incoming pointer events. Multiple `RenderView`s can be added to the binding (typically one per `FlutterView`) to produce multiple Scenes.
* Instead of owning a single `pipelineOwner`, the `RendererBinding` now owns the root of the `PipelineOwner` tree (exposed as `rootPipelineOwner` on the binding). Each `PipelineOwner` in that tree (except for the root) typically manages its own render tree typically rooted in one of the `RenderView`s mentioned in the previous bullet. During frame production, the binding will instruct each `PipelineOwner` of that tree to flush layout, paint, semantics etc. A higher-level abstraction (e.g. the widgets layer, see below) is in charge of adding `PipelineOwner`s to this tree.
* Backwards compatibility: The old `renderView` and `pipelineOwner` properties of the `RendererBinding` are retained, but marked as deprecated. Care has been taken to keep their original behavior for the deprecation period, i.e. if you just call `runApp`, the render tree bootstrapped by this call is rooted in the deprecated `RendererBinding.renderView` and managed by the deprecated `RendererBinding.pipelineOwner`.
### Widgets layer changes
* The `WidgetsBinding` no longer attaches the widget tree to an existing render tree. Instead, it bootstraps a stand-alone widget tree that is not backed by a render tree. For this, `RenderObjectToWidgetAdapter` has been replaced by `RootWidget`.
* Multiple render trees can be bootstrapped and attached to the widget tree with the help of the `View` widget, which internally is backed by a `RawView` widget. Configured with a `FlutterView` to render into, the `RawView` creates a new `PipelineOwner` and a new `RenderView` for the new render tree. It adds the new `RenderView` to the `RendererBinding` and its `PipelineOwner` to the pipeline owner tree.
* The `View` widget can only appear in certain well-defined locations in the widget tree since it bootstraps a new render tree and does not insert a `RenderObject` into an ancestor. However, almost all Elements expect that their children insert `RenderObject`s, otherwise they will not function properly. To produce a good error message when the `View` widget is used in an illegal location, the `debugMustInsertRenderObjectIntoSlot` method has been added to Element, where a child can ask whether a given slot must insert a RenderObject into its ancestor or not. In practice, the `View` widget can be used as a child of the `RootWidget`, inside the `view` slot of the `ViewAnchor` (see below) and inside a `ViewCollection` (see below). In those locations, the `View` widget may be wrapped in other non-RenderObjectWidgets (e.g. InheritedWidgets).
* The new `ViewAnchor` can be used to create a side-view inside a parent `View`. The `child` of the `ViewAnchor` widget renders into the parent `View` as usual, but the `view` slot can take on another `View` widget, which has access to all inherited widgets above the `ViewAnchor`. Metaphorically speaking, the view is anchored to the location of the `ViewAnchor` in the widget tree.
* The new `ViewCollection` widget allows for multiple sibling views as it takes a list of `View`s as children. It can be used in all the places that accept a `View` widget.
## Google3
As of July 5, 2023 this change passed a TAP global presubmit (TGP) in google3: tap/OCL:544707016:BASE:545809771:1688597935864:e43dd651
## Note to reviewers
This change is big (sorry). I suggest focusing the initial review on the changes inside of `packages/flutter` first. The majority of the changes describe above are implemented in (listed in suggested review order):
* `rendering/binding.dart`
* `widgets/binding.dart`
* `widgets/view.dart`
* `widgets/framework.dart`
All other changes included in the PR are basically the fallout of what's implemented in those files. Also note that a lot of the lines added in this PR are documentation and tests.
I am also very happy to walk reviewers through the code in person or via video call, if that is helpful.
I appreciate any feedback.
## Feedback to address before submitting ("TODO")
Manual roll is needed because incoming dart sdk requires updated version
vm_snapshot_analysis (>=0.7.4).
5ae09b8b4f...7c83ea3e85
```
7c83ea3e85 Reland "Manual roll Dart SDK from 2d98d9e27dae to 0b07debd5862 (21 revisions) (#43457)" (#43472)
9ef3e8d533 Roll Skia from 5eba922297bb to 93c92f97f5ab (2 revisions) (#43471)
```
Remove implementation of SuitePlatform from the test as well. Remove use
of fake cwd from SuitePlatform as it can't be properly faked.
- Bumps `vm_service` from `11.6.0` to `11.7.1`
- Bumps `web` from `0.1.3-beta` to `0.1.4-beta` and adds it everywhere.
- Moves `js` from `dependencies` to `dev_dependencies`
Syncs our lints with https://github.com/dart-lang/linter/blob/master/example/all.yaml:
* removed the deprecated `iterable_contains_unrelated_type` and `list_remove_unrelated_type` lints (their replacement `collection_methods_unrelated_type` was already enabled for us)
* enabled the new `no_self_assignments` and fixed one issue triggered by the lint.
