This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
final List<SupportedPlatform> platforms = includeRoot
? <SupportedPlatform>[SupportedPlatform.root]
: <SupportedPlatform>[];
if (android.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.android);
}
if (ios.exists) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.ios);
}
if (web.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.web);
}
if (macos.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.macos);
}
if (linux.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.linux);
}
if (windows.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.windows);
}
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.fuchsia);
}
return platforms;
}
// after
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
return <SupportedPlatform>[
if (includeRoot) SupportedPlatform.root,
if (android.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.android,
if (ios.exists) SupportedPlatform.ios,
if (web.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.web,
if (macos.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.macos,
if (linux.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.linux,
if (windows.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.windows,
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.fuchsia,
];
}
```
When performing artifact lookups for `Artifact.genSnapshot` for macOS desktop builds, a `TargetPlatform` is used to determine the name of the tool, typically `gen_snapshot_$TARGET_ARCH`. Formerly, this tool was always named `gen_snapshot`.
The astute reader may ask "but Chris, didn't we support TWO target architectures on iOS and therefore need TWO `gen_snapshot` binaries?" Yes, we did support both armv7 and arm64 target architectures on iOS. But no, we didn't initially have two `gen_snapshot` binaries. We did *build* two `gen_snapshots`:
* A 32-bit x86 binary that emitted armv7 AOT code
* A 64-bit x64 binary that emitted arm64 AOT code
At the time, the bitness of the `gen_snapshot` tool needed to match the bitness of the target architecture, and to avoid having to do a lot of work plumbing through suffixed `gen_snapshot` names, the author of that work (who, as evidenced by this patch, is still paying for his code crimes) elected to "cleverly" lipo the two together into a single multi-architecture macOS binary still named `gen_snapshot`. See: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/4948
This was later remediated over the course of several patches, including:
* https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/10430
* https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/22818
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/37445
However, there were still cases (notably `--local-engine` workflows in the tool) where we weren't computing the target platform and thus referenced the generic `gen_snapshot` tool.
See: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/38933
Fixed in: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/28345
The test removed in this PR, which ensured that null `SnapshotType.platform` was supported was introduced in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/11924 as a followup to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/11820 when the snapshotting logic was originally extracted to the `GenSnapshot` class, and most invocations still passed a null target platform.
Since there are no longer any cases where `TargetPlatform` isn't passed when looking up `Artifact.genSnapshot`, we can safely make the platform non-nullable and remove the test.
This is pre-factoring towards the removal of the generic `gen_snapshot` artifact from the macOS host binaries (which are currently unused since we never pass a null `TargetPlatform`), which is pre-factoring towards the goal of building `gen_snapshot` binaries with an arm64 host architecture, and eliminate the need to use Rosetta during iOS and macOS Flutter builds.
Part of: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101138
Umbrella issue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/103386
Umbrella issue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/69157
No new tests since the behaviour is enforced by the compiler.
This tweaks the Flutter doctor messages for CocoaPods.
This also switches the "unknown version" error to link to the update instructions instead of the installation instructions; the user has already installed CocoaPods in this scenario.
Example error before:
```
â CocoaPods not installed.
CocoaPods is used to retrieve the iOS and macOS platform side's plugin code that responds to your plugin usage on the Dart side.
Without CocoaPods, plugins will not work on iOS or macOS.
For more info, see https://flutter.dev/platform-plugins
To install see https://guides.cocoapods.org/using/getting-started.html#installation for instructions.
```
Example error after:
```
â CocoaPods not installed.
CocoaPods is a package manager for iOS or macOS platform code.
Without CocoaPods, plugins will not work on iOS or macOS.
For more info, see https://flutter.dev/platform-plugins
For installation instructions, see https://guides.cocoapods.org/using/getting-started.html#installation
```
Convert `ProjectMigration.run()` and `ProjectMigrator.migrate()` to be async.
Needed for Swift Package Manager migration, which requires some async processes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146256
There are two issues in the previous implementation:
1. `_populateDevices` will return the devices from `deviceNotifier` if it had been initialized, assuming that once it's initialized, it has been properly populated. That assumption is not true because calling getters like `onAdded` would initialize `deviceNotifier` without populating it.
2. `deviceNotifier` instance might be replaced in some cases, causing `onAdded` subscribers to lose any future updates.
To fix (1), this commit added the `isPopulated` field in `deviceNotifier` as a more accurate flag to determine if we need to populate it.
To fix (2), this commit made `deviceNotifier` a final member in `PolingDeviceDiscovery`.
Originally, my aim was just to refactor (as per usual), but while messing around with the `TableBorder.symmetric` constructor, I realized that `borderRadius` was missing!
This pull request makes a few class constructors more efficient, and it fixes#144277 by adding the missing parameter.
<br>
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348.
**Issue.** The `equals` implementation of `AssetsEntry` is incorrect. It compares `flavors` lists using reference equality. This PR addresses this.
This also adds a test to make sure valid asset `flavors` declarations are parsed correctly.
While we are here, this PR also includes a couple of refactorings:
* `flutter_manifest_test.dart` is a bit large. To better match our style guide, I've factored out some related tests into their own file.
* A couple of changes to the `_validateListType` function in `flutter_manifest.dart`:
* The function now returns a list of errors instead of accepting a list to append onto. This is more readable and also allows callers to know which errors were found by the call.
* The function is renamed to `_validateList` and now accepts an `Object?` instead of an `YamlList`. If the argument is null, an appropriate error message is contained in the output. This saves callers that are only interested in validation from having to write their own null-check, which they all did before.
* Some error strings were tweaked for increased readability and/or grammatical correctness.
It's now possible to natively compile a flutter app for windows-arm64. Cross-compilation is not yet implemented.
Uses arm64 artifacts now available for Dart/Flutter. Platform detection is based on Abi class, provided by Dart. Depending if Dart is an arm64 or x64 binary, the Abi is set accordingly. Initial bootstrap of dart artifacts (update_dart_sdk.ps1) is checking PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE environment variable, which is the way to detect host architecture on Windows.
This is available only for master channel (on other channels, it fallbacks to windows-x64).
On windows-x64, it produces an x64 app. On windows-arm64, it produces an arm64 app.
The legacy welcome message would be printed even if `CI=true` confusing
parsers of the output.
This fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/139737
---------
Co-authored-by: eliasyishak <42216813+eliasyishak@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts flutter/flutter#137618
Initiated by: Jasguerrero
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
It's now possible to natively compile a flutter app for
windows-arm64. Cross-compilation is not yet implemented.
Uses arm64 artifacts now available for Dart/Flutter.
Platform detection is based on Abi class, provided by Dart. Depending if
Dart is an arm64 or x64 binary, the Abi is set accordingly.
Initial bootstrap of dart artifacts (update_dart_sdk.ps1) is checking
PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE environment variable, which is the way to detect
host architecture on Windows.
This is available only for master channel (on other channels, it
fallbacks to windows-x64).
On windows-x64, it produces an x64 app. On windows-arm64, it produces an
arm64 app.
It's now possible to natively compile a flutter app for
windows-arm64. Cross-compilation is not yet implemented.
Uses arm64 artifacts now available for Dart/Flutter.
Platform detection is based on Abi class, provided by Dart. Depending if
Dart is an arm64 or x64 binary, the Abi is set accordingly.
Initial bootstrap of dart artifacts (update_dart_sdk.ps1) is checking
PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE environment variable, which is the way to detect
host architecture on Windows.
This is available only for master channel (on other channels, it
fallbacks to windows-x64).
On windows-x64, it produces an x64 app. On windows-arm64, it produces an
arm64 app.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/139709
This adds a static helper method `ProcessUtils.writelnToStdinGuarded()`, which will asynchronously write to a sub-process's STDIN `IOSink` and catch errors.
In talking with Brian, it sounds like this is the best and most reliable way to catch `SocketException`s during these writes *to sub-process file descriptors* specifically (with a "real" hard drive file, the future returned by `.flush()` should complete with the write error).
Also, as I note in the dartdoc to `writelnToStdinGuarded()`, the behavior seems to be different between macOS and linux.
Moving forward, in any place where we want to catch exceptions writing to STDIN, we will want to use this new helper.
Reverts flutter/flutter#132985
Initiated by: christopherfujino
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Provides support for conditional bundling of assets through the existing `--flavor` option for `flutter build` and `flutter run`. Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21682. Resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136092
## Change
Within the `assets` section pubspec.yaml, the user can now specify one or more `flavors` that an asset belongs to. Consider this example:
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
flutter:
assets:
- assets/normal-asset.png
- path: assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- strawberry
```
With this pubspec,
* `flutter run --flavor vanilla` will not include `assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png` in the build output.
* `flutter run --flavor strawberry` will not include `assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png`.
* `flutter run` will only include `assets/normal-asset.png`.
## Open questions
* Should this be supported for all platforms, or should this change be limited to ones with documented `--flavor` support (Android, iOS, and (implicitly) MacOS)? This PR currently only enables this feature for officially supported platforms.
## Design thoughts, what this PR does not do, etc.
### This does not provide an automatic mapping/resolution of asset keys/paths to others based on flavor at runtime.
The implementation in this PR represents a simplest approach. Notably, it does not give Flutter the ability to dynamically choose an asset based on flavor using a single asset key. For example, one can't use `Image.asset('config.json')` to dynamically choose between different "flavors" of `config.json` (such as `dev-flavor/config.json` or `prod-flavor/config.json`). However, a user could always implement such a mechanism in their project or in a library by examining the flavor at runtime.
### When multiple entries affect the same file and 1) at least one of these entries have a `flavors` list provided and 2) these lists are not equivalent, we always consider the manifest to be ambiguous and will throw a `ToolExit`.
<details>
For example, these manifests would all be considered ambiguous:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/
- path: assets/vanilla.png
flavors:
- vanilla
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/vanilla/cherry.png
flavor:
- cherry
# Thinking towards the future where we might add glob/regex support and more conditions other than flavor:
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/**
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/**/ios/**
platforms:
- ios
# Ambiguous in the case of assets like "assets/vanilla/ios/icon.svg" since we
# don't know if flavor `vanilla` and platform `ios` should be combined using or-logic or and-logic.
```
See [this review comment thread](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/132985#discussion_r1381909942) for the full story on how I arrived at this decision.
</details>
### This does not support Android's multidimensional flavors feature (in an intuitive way)
<details>
Conder this excerpt from a Flutter project's android/app/build.gradle file:
```groovy
android {
// ...
flavorDimensions "mode", "api"
productFlavors {
free {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".free"
}
premium {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".premium"
}
minApi23 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi23"
}
minApi21 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi21"
}
}
}
```
In this setup, the following values are valid `--flavor` are valid `freeMinApi21`, `freeMinApi23`, `premiumMinApi21`, and `premiumMinApi23`. We call these values "flavor combinations". Consider the following from the Android documentation[^1]:
> In addition to the source set directories you can create for each individual product flavor and build variant, you can also create source set directories for each combination of product flavors. For example, you can create and add Java sources to the src/demoMinApi24/java/ directory, and Gradle uses those sources only when building a variant that combines those two product flavors.
>
> Source sets you create for product flavor combinations have a higher priority than source sets that belong to each individual product flavor. To learn more about source sets and how Gradle merges resources, read the section about how to [create source sets](https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#sourcesets).
This feature will not behave in this way. If a user utilizes this feature and also Android's multidimensional flavors feature, they will have to list out all flavor combinations that contain the flavor they want to limit an asset to:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/free/
flavors:
- freeMinApi21
- freeMinApi23
```
This is mostly due to a technical limitation in the hot-reload feature of `flutter run`. During a hot reload, the tool will try to update the asset bundle on the device, but the tool does not know the flavors contained within the flavor combination (that the user passes to `--flavor`). Gradle is the source of truth of what flavors were involved in the build, and `flutter run` currently does not access to that information since it's an implementation detail of the build process. We could bubble up this information, but it would require a nontrivial amount of engineering work, and it's unclear how desired this functionality is. It might not be worth implementing.
</details>
See https://flutter.dev/go/flavor-specific-assets for the (outdated) design document.
<summary>Pre-launch Checklist</summary>
</details>
[^1]: https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#flavor-dimensions
Provides support for conditional bundling of assets through the existing `--flavor` option for `flutter build` and `flutter run`. Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21682. Resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136092
## Change
Within the `assets` section pubspec.yaml, the user can now specify one or more `flavors` that an asset belongs to. Consider this example:
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
flutter:
assets:
- assets/normal-asset.png
- path: assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- strawberry
```
With this pubspec,
* `flutter run --flavor vanilla` will not include `assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png` in the build output.
* `flutter run --flavor strawberry` will not include `assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png`.
* `flutter run` will only include `assets/normal-asset.png`.
## Open questions
* Should this be supported for all platforms, or should this change be limited to ones with documented `--flavor` support (Android, iOS, and (implicitly) MacOS)? This PR currently only enables this feature for officially supported platforms.
## Design thoughts, what this PR does not do, etc.
### This does not provide an automatic mapping/resolution of asset keys/paths to others based on flavor at runtime.
The implementation in this PR represents a simplest approach. Notably, it does not give Flutter the ability to dynamically choose an asset based on flavor using a single asset key. For example, one can't use `Image.asset('config.json')` to dynamically choose between different "flavors" of `config.json` (such as `dev-flavor/config.json` or `prod-flavor/config.json`). However, a user could always implement such a mechanism in their project or in a library by examining the flavor at runtime.
### When multiple entries affect the same file and 1) at least one of these entries have a `flavors` list provided and 2) these lists are not equivalent, we always consider the manifest to be ambiguous and will throw a `ToolExit`.
<details>
For example, these manifests would all be considered ambiguous:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/
- path: assets/vanilla.png
flavors:
- vanilla
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/vanilla/cherry.png
flavor:
- cherry
# Thinking towards the future where we might add glob/regex support and more conditions other than flavor:
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/**
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/**/ios/**
platforms:
- ios
# Ambiguous in the case of assets like "assets/vanilla/ios/icon.svg" since we
# don't know if flavor `vanilla` and platform `ios` should be combined using or-logic or and-logic.
```
See [this review comment thread](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/132985#discussion_r1381909942) for the full story on how I arrived at this decision.
</details>
### This does not support Android's multidimensional flavors feature (in an intuitive way)
<details>
Conder this excerpt from a Flutter project's android/app/build.gradle file:
```groovy
android {
// ...
flavorDimensions "mode", "api"
productFlavors {
free {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".free"
}
premium {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".premium"
}
minApi23 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi23"
}
minApi21 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi21"
}
}
}
```
In this setup, the following values are valid `--flavor` are valid `freeMinApi21`, `freeMinApi23`, `premiumMinApi21`, and `premiumMinApi23`. We call these values "flavor combinations". Consider the following from the Android documentation[^1]:
> In addition to the source set directories you can create for each individual product flavor and build variant, you can also create source set directories for each combination of product flavors. For example, you can create and add Java sources to the src/demoMinApi24/java/ directory, and Gradle uses those sources only when building a variant that combines those two product flavors.
>
> Source sets you create for product flavor combinations have a higher priority than source sets that belong to each individual product flavor. To learn more about source sets and how Gradle merges resources, read the section about how to [create source sets](https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#sourcesets).
This feature will not behave in this way. If a user utilizes this feature and also Android's multidimensional flavors feature, they will have to list out all flavor combinations that contain the flavor they want to limit an asset to:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/free/
flavors:
- freeMinApi21
- freeMinApi23
```
This is mostly due to a technical limitation in the hot-reload feature of `flutter run`. During a hot reload, the tool will try to update the asset bundle on the device, but the tool does not know the flavors contained within the flavor combination (that the user passes to `--flavor`). Gradle is the source of truth of what flavors were involved in the build, and `flutter run` currently does not access to that information since it's an implementation detail of the build process. We could bubble up this information, but it would require a nontrivial amount of engineering work, and it's unclear how desired this functionality is. It might not be worth implementing.
</details>
See https://flutter.dev/go/flavor-specific-assets for the (outdated) design document.
<summary>Pre-launch Checklist</summary>
</details>
[^1]: https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#flavor-dimensions
Part of tracker issue:
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/128251
This migrates the event being sent when the "--analyze-size" is used in a flutter invocation
The only file that had this event being sent from is `packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/base/analyze_size.dart`
