Part of #137040 and #80374
The flag `throwOnPluginPubspecError` never actually was enabled during production in #79669, but only in some dart plugin tests. And in the tests the case of the error when enabling the flag was not explicitly tested. The only thing tested was, that it is not thrown when disabled.
As explained [here](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142035#discussion_r1484237904) the only case, where this error could be thrown is, when a dart implementation and a native inline implementation are provided simultaneously. But throwing an exception there is a wrong behavior, as both can coexist in a plugin package, thus in the pubspec file.
Disabling the flag means, that the error is not thrown and not shown to the user. This is the case in production (contrary to the dart plugin tests), which acts like these plugin cases of implementations are just skipped. And this is what actually should be done.
In conclusion, I think the case of coexisting dart and native implementation in pubspec was just overlooked and therefore this error validation was introduced, which is not necessary or even valid.
For more discussion, see: https://discord.com/channels/608014603317936148/608022056616853515/1200194937791205436
- This is tricky: I already added a test in #142035, which finally complies with the other tests, by removing the flag. So I think it falls in the category of "remove dead code".
- Theoretically this is a breaking change, as removing / altering some tests. But the flag actually was never valid or used, so IDK. But this may not does fall in the category of "contributed tests".
Part of #137040 and #80374
- Differentiate pubspec and resolution errors
- Rename platform to platformKey
- Add TODO for rework logic of flag [throwOnPluginPubspecError]
- Swap for loop: handle by platform and then by plugin
I continued [my mission](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141431) to find as many typos as I could. This time it's a smaller set than before.
There is no need for issues since it's a typo fix.
* Starts using the `--source` flag to compile the dart registrant.
* updated general.shard tests
* Fixed the resident compiler flow
* added integration test
* made the integration test self contained
* renamed generated_main to dart_plugin_registrant
* cleaned up for review
* added task runner for ci
* added bringup and TESTOWNERS
* updated failure message
Building an application for a desktop platform that transitively included any Dart-based plugins (such as path_provider) broke `flutter test`, because its compilation was overriding the provided main (in this case, the test main) with `generated_main.dart` if it was present. This PR:
- Changes the `flutter test` compilation path to update `generated_main.dart`, so that the tests will work, and will include any registered Dart plugins.
- Makes using `generated_main.dart` during recompile opt-in, to try to reduce the chance of a similar bug happening with other codepaths in the future.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/88794
