<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
This feature landed opt-in in 3.29 and opt-out in 3.32:
https://docs.flutter.dev/release/breaking-changes/flutter-generate-i10n-source
In this PR, we remove the ability to use `flutter config
--no-enable-explicit-package-dependencies`, and remove all places that
opt-in to the flag (which are currently NOPs). Follow-up PRs will
refactor tests relying on the older behavior, and then finally remove
`package:flutter_gen` and the `.flutter-plugins` (legacy format) file
guarded by this flag.
My newly added DDC macrobenchmarks tests have been timing out on the
test infra. It turns out that `headless` Chrome is significantly slower
than headful Chrome (reasons unknown, but perhaps related to hardware
acceleration). Using `--headless=new` instead of `flutter run`'s
headless flag (which uses the old headless mode) makes my local runs
significantly (10x+) faster.
*This time for sure*
Bypasses this error in the test infra `[2025-04-30 20:32:46.191597]
[STDOUT] [CHROME STDERR]:
[CHROME]:[3497:3497:0430/203246.172288:ERROR:ozone_platform_x11.cc(244)]
Missing X server or $DISPLAY`.
Resolves this error on the bots (I hope!):
```
[2025-04-29 15:56:48.817223] [STDOUT] [CHROME STDERR]: [CHROME]:[41258:41258:0429/155648.790553:FATAL:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(126)] No usable sandbox! Update your kernel or see https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/linux/suid_sandbox_development.md for more information on developing with the SUID sandbox. If you want to live dangerously and need an immediate workaround, you can try using --no-sandbox.
```
Notable changes:
* Allows macrobenchmarks to run via `flutter run`.
* Splits macrobenchmarking between "orchestration logic" and "app
serving" (served on separate ports on the same machine to keep the
scheme consistent with the `flutter build` path).
* Adds an intercepted entrypoint for web benchmarks. We can't pass flags
to the app since it's not supported, so I've hard-coded the
orchestration server's port.
* Adding logic to connect to an existing Chrome debugger instance (vs
spawning one) for benchmarks.
The keyboard hot restart test listens to `flutter run` logs and then
does an action. However, the test prints the `flutter run` log after the
action. This results in confusing logs.
For example:
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8716606099574306145/+/u/run_keyboard_hot_restart_ios/stdout
```
═══════════╡ ••• Launch app and wait for keyboard to be visible ••• ╞═══════════
...
stdout: Installing and launching... 37.2s
stdout: Syncing files to device swarming’s iPhone...
════╡ ••• Update the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible ••• ╞════
════════════════════════╡ ••• Hot restart the app ••• ╞═════════════════════════
════════════╡ ••• Wait until the keyboard is no longer visible ••• ╞════════════
stdout: flutter: Keyboard is open
```
Here, the test waits until the keyboard is visible before moving onto
the test's next step. However, the log that triggers this action
(`flutter: Keyboard is open`) is printed after the action was taken
(`Update the app to no longer force the keyboard to be visible` and
`Wait until the keyboard is no longer visible`). This is confusing.
Follow-up to: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/167013
Part of: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/10713
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/luci.flutter.staging/Mac_arm64_ios%20imitation_game_flutter
The swiftui benchmark has been failing in bring up because the project
wasnt getting correctly codesigned. Also, fixes the fact that I flipped
the naming of imitation_game_flutter and imitation_game_swiftui 😶🌫️
Also removes extraneous targets from the project
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/try.shadow/Mac_arm64_ios%20imitation_game_flutter/14/overview
Tested with `led`, proof that it's working post this PR ^
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
We're adding macrobenchmark support to DDC (AMD modules and our new
hot-reload-capable module system) to be aware of any current/future
performance regressions. I'm not terribly aware of the metrics
collection pipeline; please let me know if we need to do any more work
to see these tests run/report numbers to the proper dashboards.
We currently benchmark path tessellation on Android and iOS, but only
for filled paths. We will now run those same benchmarks also with
stroking in a new set of benchmarks.
This reverts commit
8dccbc33df.
Find/replace didn't catch the use of `jvmTarget = "1.8"` in
`dev/integration_tests/android_engine_test/android/app/build.gradle` and
`android_engine_test` needed to have `"com.android.application"`
updated.
Should resolve issues related to the following messages being output on
stderr:
```
warning: [options] source value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release"
warning: [options] target value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release
warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use -Xlint:-options.
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165973
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#165749
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Still passing command-line arguments from recipes
that have no effect but cause the runner to crash.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: matanlurey
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {jtmcdole}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Partial re-land of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/165628:
- Fixes the mistake that the `Cocoon` class did things that well, were
not specific to Cocoon.
- Renamed to `MetricsResultWriter`, as that is all it does now.
---
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165618.
The `devicelab/bin/test_runner.dart upload-metrics` command use to have
_two_ responsibilities:
- Well, upload test **metrics** (benchmarks) to Skia Perf (it still does
that)
- Upload test **status** to Cocoon (it did until
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/165614)
As https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/165614 proved, this API
predated the current LUCI setup, where Cocoon itself receives task
status updates from LUCI, and it turns out this entire time, DeviceLab
was making (at best) NOP calls, and at worst, causing crashes and
corrupt data (https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165610).
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Clarke <aaclarke@google.com>
Co-authored-by: gaaclarke <30870216+gaaclarke@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#165628
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jtmcdole
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: breaking tree:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Linux_mokey%20backdrop_filter_perf__e2e_summary/3833/overview
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: matanlurey
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {jtmcdole, yjbanov}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
🚫 **Do not merge** until
https://flutter-review.googlesource.com/c/recipes/+/64220/1 is merged.
---
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165618.
The `devicelab/bin/test_runner.dart upload-metrics` command use to have
_two_ responsibilities:
- Well, upload test **metrics** (benchmarks) to Skia Perf (it still does
that)
- Upload test **status** to Cocoon (it did until
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/165614)
As https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/165614 proved, this API
predated the current LUCI setup, where Cocoon itself receives task
status updates from LUCI, and it turns out this entire time, DeviceLab
was making (at best) NOP calls, and at worst, causing crashes and
corrupt data (https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165610).
In other words, this is removing entirely dead/unused code (though the
recipes have to be updated first).
/cc @jason-simmons as I need Jason's help reviewing the recipes change
and want to provide context.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#165261
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jonahwilliams
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: bork the tree
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jonahwilliams
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {gaaclarke}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
