Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
This PR updates almost* all Gradle buildscripts in the Flutter repo the `example` and `dev` (in particular, in `dev/integration_tests` and in `dev/benchmarks`) directories to apply Flutter's Gradle plugins using the declarative `plugins {}` block.
*almost, because:
- add-to-app (aka hybrid) apps are not migrated (related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/138756)
- apps that purposefully use build files to ensure backward compatibility (e.g. [`gradle_deprecated_settings`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/tree/3.16.0/dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings))
Reverts flutter/flutter#142062
Initiated by: eliasyishak
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
This PR makes no _behavioral_ changes to executed code, and instead focuses on organization and naming:
1. Almost[^1] anything named `external_ui` is renamed `external_textures`
1. Extended the README to explain the intent of the test, as well as how to run it
1. Renamed `main.dart` and `main_test.dart` to `frame_rate_main.dart` and `frame_rate_test.dart` (we'll add more)
1. Did some refactoring of the test to make it more obvious what is being asserted (i.e. `widgetBuilds` and friends)
Given how complex (and in-flux) this directory is, I'm also requesting either John, Jonah or I review any changes.
[^1]: Except the name of the `.ci.yaml` task, i.e. `name: Linux_pixel_7pro external_ui_integration_test` because I'm apparently not able to change that without creating a new task as `bringup: true` and playing a bit of a dance. Maybe that's worth doing though (in future PRs)?
This PR makes no _behavioral_ changes to executed code, and instead
focuses on organization and naming:
1. Almost[^1] anything named `external_ui` is renamed
`external_textures`
1. Extended the README to explain the intent of the test, as well as how
to run it
1. Renamed `main.dart` and `main_test.dart` to `frame_rate_main.dart`
and `frame_rate_test.dart` (we'll add more)
1. Did some refactoring of the test to make it more obvious what is
being asserted (i.e. `widgetBuilds` and friends)
Given how complex (and in-flux) this directory is, I'm also requesting
either John, Jonah or I review any changes.
[^1]: Except the name of the `.ci.yaml` task, i.e. `name:
Linux_pixel_7pro external_ui_integration_test` because I'm apparently
not able to change that without creating a new task as `bringup: true`
and playing a bit of a dance. Maybe that's worth doing though (in future
PRs)?
