* Gallery scaffolding
* Started RenderSliver
* demo and initial hookup
* Cleaned up demo more and scaffolding basic sliver->widget communication structure.
* works
* states and default indicator building works
* start adding docs
* added an alignment setting optimized the sliver relayout mechanism
* tested a default bottom aligned sized indicator
* Added a bunch of tests
* more fixes and more tests
* Finished the tests
* Add docs
* Add more doc diffing wrt material pull to refresh
* Mention nav bar synergy
* add more asserts
* review 1
* Fix mockito 2 / dart 2 / strong typed tests
* review
* Remove the vscode config
* review
This lets us preview widgets in the gallery using small, normal, large, and HUGE text.
Added selections to the main drawer for these options. Defaults to "normal", obviously.
* Don't trigger assert if a render object ceases to be a semantic boundary
This bug was exposed by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/11309, which caused the following assertion to trigger when scrolling in the Animation demo:
```
The following assertion was thrown during _updateSemantics():
'package:flutter/src/rendering/object.dart': Failed assertion: line 2626 pos 16: 'fragment is
_InterestingSemanticsFragment': is not true.
```
A minimal reproduction of the bug can be found in `semantics_10_test.dart`, which has been added as a regression test for the bug by this PR.
Looking at that test, here is a description of the faulty behaviour:
1. During the second `pumpWidget` call `RenderExcludeSemantics` marks itself as needing a semantics update (due to excluding going from `false` -> `true`).
2. This causes the nearest ancestor with semantics information (here: `RenderSemanticsAnnotations` representing the "container" Semantics widget) to be added to the `_nodesNeedingSemantics` list.
3. `RenderSliverList` (implementation behind ListView) marks itself as needing a semantics update (due to its changing children).
4. This causes the `RenderSemanticsGestureHandler` to be added to the `_nodesNeedingSemantics` list.
5. Next, canDrag is updated from `true` -> `false`. This means, `RenderSemanticsGestureHandler` is no longer a semantics boundary, it marks itself as needing a semantics update.
6. The nearest ancestor with semantics (`RenderSemanticsAnnotations`, the "container") is added to the `_nodesNeedingSemantics` list (this is a no-op because it is already in the list).
7. During `flushSemantics`, the `_nodesNeedingSemantics` list is walked. The first entry (`RenderSemanticsAnnotations`) updates the semantics tree to only contain the container widget and drop everything else (= no children of the ExcludeSemantics widget are walked).
8. The second entry (`RenderSemanticsGestureHandler`) is updated. It does not add any semantics of its own and is no longer a semantics boundary. Therefore, it wants to merge its descendent semantics into its parents. Here is where the assert throws because the algorithm assumes that every entry in the `_nodesNeedingSemantics` list will produce and own an `_InterestingSemanticsFragment` (passing your semantics on to your parents is not interesting).
The problem here seems to be step 4 in combination with step 5. In step 4 we rely on the fact that `RenderSemanticsGestureHandler` is an (explicit or implicit) semantics boundary and that it will be able to absorb the semantics change of `RenderSliverList`. This is true
at this time. However, in step 4 `RenderSemanticsGestureHandler` decides to no longer be an (explicit or implicit) semantics boundary and our assumption from step 5 becomes incorrect. We did nothing to correct this assumption.
This PR removes a node, that could potentially cease to be a (explicit or implicit) semantics boundary from the `_nodesNeedingSemantics` list to fix that problem. Please node that this does not mean that the node's semantics will not be updated: The node's closest ances
tor with semantics is added to that list during the `markNeedsSemanticsUpdate` call. During `flushSemantics` we will walk from this node to update the semantics of it's children (if changed), which will include the node in question.
* tiny fix
* simplify test
* analyzer fixes
* review comments
* Manually fix every use of Point.x and Point.y
Some of these were moved to dx/dy, but not all.
* Manually convert uses of the old gradient API
* Remove old reference to Point.
* Mechanical changes
I applied the following at the root of the Flutter repository:
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bPoint[.]origin\b/Offset.zero/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bPoint[.]lerp\b/Offset.lerp/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bnew Point\b/new Offset/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bconst Point\b/const Offset/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bstatic Point /static Offset /g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bfinal Point /final Offset /g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/^\( *\)Point /\1Offset /g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/ui[.]Point\b/ui.Offset/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/(Point\b/(Offset/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\([[{,]\) Point\b/\1 Offset/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/@required Point\b/@required Offset/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/<Point>/<Offset>/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/[.]toOffset()//g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/[.]toPoint()//g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bshow Point, /show /g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bshow Point;/show Offset;/g'
* Mechanical changes - dartdocs
I applied the following at the root of the Flutter repository:
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\ba \[Point\]/an [Offset]/g'
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 sed -i 's/\[Point\]/[Offset]/g'
* Further improvements and a test
* Fix minor errors from rebasing...
* Roll engine
* Bump to Dart SDK 1.23.0-dev.10
* allows us to understand flutter usage via telemetry
* brings in `@immutable`
Fixes: #9042
* completer fix
* Update to platform 1.1.1.
Move the back button and drawer opening logic into the app bar.
Move the tap-status-bar-to-scroll-to-top logic to using
ScrollControllers. Provide a PrimaryScrollController and a `primary`
flag on scroll views.
Make it possible to track when a route becomes or stops being poppable.
This makes it possible to substitute 'flutter run' for 'flutter test'
and actually watch a test run on a device.
For any test that depends on flutter_test:
1. Remove any import of 'package:test/test.dart'.
2. Replace `testWidgets('...', (WidgetTester tester) {`
with `testWidgets('...', (WidgetTester tester) async {`
3. Add an "await" in front of calls to any of the following:
* tap()
* tapAt()
* fling()
* flingFrom()
* scroll()
* scrollAt()
* pump()
* pumpWidget()
4. Replace any calls to `tester.flushMicrotasks()` with calls to
`await tester.idle()`.
There's a guarding API that you can use, if you have particularly
complicated tests, to get better error messages. Search for
TestAsyncUtils.
