This reverts commit
8dccbc33df.
Find/replace didn't catch the use of `jvmTarget = "1.8"` in
`dev/integration_tests/android_engine_test/android/app/build.gradle` and
`android_engine_test` needed to have `"com.android.application"`
updated.
Should resolve issues related to the following messages being output on
stderr:
```
warning: [options] source value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release"
warning: [options] target value 8 is obsolete and will be removed in a future release
warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use -Xlint:-options.
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/165973
Fixes#162107
Commands that were helpful when working on this pr.
`dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart
--no-gradle-generation` from flutter/flutter root.
`./gradlew test` from packages/flutter_tools/gradle.
`git add -- ":*.lockfile"` for adding only lockfile changes.
`../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
android_java11_dependency_smoke_tests` from dev/devicelab
`ktlint --editorconfig=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/.editorconfig
--baseline=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/ktlint-baseline.xml
packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/ --format` formatting kotlin code.
Need ktlint 1.5
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160257.
~~This will sit on CI for a bit and give me a better idea of how much
work there is to do.~~ Done!
## IMPORTANT: Do **not** revert on 1-2 isolated post-submit failures.
While I've spent the last several weeks getting this passing all
presubmit tests, and some integration tests I suspected might be
affected, it is possible that there are 1-2 integration tests that will
fail as a result of landing this PR. I'll disable the flag
(`--no-explicit-package-dependencies`) if the failures look obvious
enough, otherwise I'll revert.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#159756
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gmackall
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Made the tree red due to some std out.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gmackall
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150733
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: This breaks apps that use plugins that use `compileSdk` 31, some of which we use in our postsubmit (so it blocks the tree).
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {jason-simmons}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Manual engine roll to https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53532, because the roll requires lockfile generation.
Manual recreation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148911
Entire PR is just the output of
```
flutter update-packages --force-upgrade
```
followed by (run from the root of the flutter repo)
```
find . -type d -name 'android' | dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146181.
Just 3 commits:
1. a revert of the revert
2. the fix described in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146181#issuecomment-2038238869
3. updating two postsubmit tests from Java 11 to 17, as that is required for this new AGP version.
I've verified that `flutter build apk --flavor paid --debug` fails in `dev/integration_tests/flavors/` with the error in ci without (2), and succeeds with it.
I've also verified that the `dev/benchmarks/complex_layout` app builds successfully with Java 17.
That covers all the postsubmits that failed according [to the dashboard](https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#146181
Initiated by: LongCatIsLooong
Reason for reverting: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_android%20flavors_test_win/11086/overview
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, christopherfujino}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Bump almost all tests to AGP 8.1 and Gradle 8.3
Flutter gallery is excluded, because it uses discontinued plugins that in turn use old Gradle versions, and that prevents upgrading. Will take some extra work to figure out what to do there.
Should bump templates next
Entire PR generated with the lockfile generation script, except for:
1. changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/`, which must be done manually (and exclusion of the gallery for reason mentioned above).
2. Changes to many `AndroidManifest.xml` files to remove the `package` attribute and instead set that same value in the `build.gradle`, in the `namespace` attribute of the `android` closure (corresponds to an AGP behavior change, see https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace).
3. Removes the use of the `battery` plugin in `android_embedding_v2_smoke_test` because the plugin is discontinued, unused, and blocks upgrading the AGP version for that app because the discontinued plugin itself uses a very old AGP version.
Bump almost all tests to AGP 8.1 and Gradle 8.3
Flutter gallery is excluded, because it uses discontinued plugins that in turn use old Gradle versions, and that prevents upgrading. Will take some extra work to figure out what to do there.
Should bump templates next
Entire PR generated with the lockfile generation script, except for:
1. changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/`, which must be done manually (and exclusion of the gallery for reason mentioned above).
2. Changes to many `AndroidManifest.xml` files to remove the `package` attribute and instead set that same value in the `build.gradle`, in the `namespace` attribute of the `android` closure (corresponds to an AGP behavior change, see https://d.android.com/r/tools/upgrade-assistant/set-namespace).
3. Removes the use of the `battery` plugin in `android_embedding_v2_smoke_test` because the plugin is discontinued, unused, and blocks upgrading the AGP version for that app because the discontinued plugin itself uses a very old AGP version.
## Description
This PR simplifies one external link in a commented section of the Android manifest template.
## Related Issue
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144249
## Tests
Documentation only PR.
This is a direct revert of (the revert of (the reland of (the policy pr))): https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143132.
The only change is:
1. to put a conditional all on one line, because the packages repository has a test that uses an old flutter project to make sure nothing regresses. The old project uses an old gradle version, and the old gradle version bundles an old groovy version, and the old groovy version has a bug where lines that start with `&&` don't always work: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7218 (I enjoy that the revert reason ends up providing another strong justification to go forward with the policy). Also thanks to @reidbaker for pointing out this bug.
2. I also made a slight formatting change to the messages that print when out of the support bounds, which I think looks slightly better.
I tested this with on a branch that included a revert of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142008, and was able to recreate the failure and verify that it was resolved by 1).
Re land of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142000.
Differences:
1. Fixed the test that was failing in postsubmit. The reason was that the Flutter Gradle Plugin was being applied after KGP in that test, so we couldn't find the KGP version. This caused a log, and the test expects no logs. I moved FGP to after KGP
2. Added to the logs for when we can't find AGP. Change is from
> "Warning: unable to detect project AGP version. Skipping version checking."
to
> ~"Warning: unable to detect project AGP version. Skipping version checking. \nThis may be because you have applied the Flutter Gradle Plugin after AGP."~
update: the above is wrong, changed to
> "Warning: unable to detect project KGP version. Skipping version checking. \nThis may be because you have applied AGP after the Flutter Gradle Plugin."
3. Added a note to the app-level build.gradle templates that FGP must go last
> // The Flutter Gradle Plugin must be applied after the Android and Kotlin Gradle plugin.
Re-sets two jvmargs that were getting cleared because we set a value for `-Xmx`. Could help with https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142957. Copied from comment here https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142957:
>Two random things I ran into while looking into this that might help:
>
>1. Gradle has defaults for a couple of the jvmargs, and setting any one of them clears those defaults for the others (bug here https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/19750). This can cause the "Gradle daemon to consume more and more native memory until it crashes", though the bug typically has a different associated error. It seems worth it to re-set those defaults.
>2. There is a property we can set that will give us a heap dump on OOM ([-XX:HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/troubleshoot/clopts001.html))
Mostly just a find and replace from `find . -name gradle.properties -exec sed -i '' 's/\-Xmx4G/-Xmx4G\ \-XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=2G\ \-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError/g' {} \;`, with the templates and the one test that writes from a string replaced by hand. I didn't set a value for `MaxMetaspaceSize` in the template files because I want to make sure this value doesn't cause problems in ci first (changes to the templates are essentially un-revertable for those who `flutter create` while the changes exist).
This PR updates almost* all Gradle buildscripts in the Flutter repo the `example` and `dev` (in particular, in `dev/integration_tests` and in `dev/benchmarks`) directories to apply Flutter's Gradle plugins using the declarative `plugins {}` block.
*almost, because:
- add-to-app (aka hybrid) apps are not migrated (related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/138756)
- apps that purposefully use build files to ensure backward compatibility (e.g. [`gradle_deprecated_settings`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/tree/3.16.0/dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings))
Upgrades agp versions and lockfiles for `dev/`. Also changes the lockfile generation script to represent the newer form of the `settings.gradle` template, and therefore also propagates these changes.
~~Potentially related to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134419~~, but worth doing anyways. (not actually related)
Reverts flutter/flutter#137191
Initiated by: camsim99
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Adds support for Android 34 in the following ways:
- Bumps integration tests compile SDK versions 33 --> 34
- Bumps template compile SDK version 33 --> 34
- Also changes deprecated `compileSdkVersion` to `compileSdk`
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134220
Adds support for Android 34 in the following ways:
- Bumps integration tests compile SDK versions 33 --> 34
- Bumps template compile SDK version 33 --> 34
- Also changes deprecated `compileSdkVersion` to `compileSdk`
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134220
