When the `"${native_assets_path}"*.framework` glob doesn't resolve anything, the bash will run the loop once with the original unglobbed value: `/path/to/native/assets/*.framework`. Skip this case to prevent the build from failing when there are no frameworks to sign.
To reproduce this build failure:
1. Enable native assets in the Flutter tool: `flutter config --enable-native-assets`
2. Create a Flutter project with the default template: `flutter create test_native_assets`
3. Add a build hook that does nothing (`hook/build.dart`).
4. Try to build/run the app: `flutter run --debug -d macos`
1. Instead of getting the `FULL_PRODUCT_NAME` Xcode build setting (`Runner.app`) instead use `PRODUCT_NAME` since most places really want the product name, and the extension stripping wasn't correct when the name contained periods.
2. Don't instruct the user to open the `xcarchive` in Xcode if it doesn't exist.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140212
For the necessary background knowledge, see the flutter.dev content on [Resolution-aware image assets](https://docs.flutter.dev/ui/assets/assets-and-images#resolution-aware) and [Conditional bundling of assets based on app flavor](https://docs.flutter.dev/ui/assets/assets-and-images#conditional-bundling-of-assets-based-on-app-flavor) if you don't have a basic understanding of these features.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151813 by using unique temporary directories, per asset file, for transformations. Currently, only a single directory is used and the name of the temporary files was based only on the basename of files. This means that `assets/image.png` and `assets/2x/image.png` would share an output path (`<temp dir path>/image.png`), causing a race. If this quick and rough explanation is a bit confusing, the original issueâ#151813âprovides a full repro and correct identification of the exact cause of the failure that can occur in the asset transformation process.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#146593
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Consistently failing `Windows_android native_assets_android` as in https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Windows_android%20native_assets_android/2533/overview
Original PR Author: bkonyi
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, kenzieschmoll}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This change is a major step towards moving away from shipping DDS via Pub.
The first component of this PR is the move away from importing package:dds to launch DDS. Instead, DDS is launched out of process using the `dart development-service` command shipped with the Dart SDK. This makes Flutter's handling of DDS consistent with the standalone Dart VM.
The second component of this PR is the initial work to prepare for the removal of instances of DevTools being served manually by the flutter_tool, instead relying on DDS to serve DevTools. This will be consistent with how the standalone Dart VM serves DevTools, tying the DevTools lifecycle to a live DDS instance. This will allow for the removal of much of the logic needed to properly manage the lifecycle of the DevTools server in a future PR. Also, by serving DevTools from DDS, users will no longer need to forward a secondary port in remote workflows as DevTools will be available on the DDS port.
There's two remaining circumstances that will prevent us from removing DevtoolsRunner completely:
- The daemon's `devtools.serve` endpoint
- `flutter drive`'s `--profile-memory` flag used for recording memory profiles
This PR also includes some refactoring around `DebuggingOptions` to reduce the number of debugging related arguments being passed as parameters adjacent to a `DebuggingOptions` instance.
This change is a major step towards moving away from shipping DDS via
Pub.
The first component of this PR is the move away from importing
package:dds to launch DDS. Instead, DDS is launched out of process using
the `dart development-service` command shipped with the Dart SDK. This
makes Flutter's handling of DDS consistent with the standalone Dart VM.
The second component of this PR is the initial work to prepare for the
removal of instances of DevTools being served manually by the
flutter_tool, instead relying on DDS to serve DevTools. This will be
consistent with how the standalone Dart VM serves DevTools, tying the
DevTools lifecycle to a live DDS instance. This will allow for the
removal of much of the logic needed to properly manage the lifecycle of
the DevTools server in a future PR. Also, by serving DevTools from DDS,
users will no longer need to forward a secondary port in remote
workflows as DevTools will be available on the DDS port. This code is currently
commented out and will be enabled in a future PR.
There's two remaining circumstances that will prevent us from removing
DevtoolsRunner completely:
- The daemon's `devtools.serve` endpoint
- `flutter drive`'s `--profile-memory` flag used for recording memory
profiles
This PR also includes some refactoring around `DebuggingOptions` to
reduce the number of debugging related arguments being passed as
parameters adjacent to a `DebuggingOptions` instance.
This will make
* `flutter run` have source maps enabled by default
* `flutter build` have source maps disabled by default
which mirrors what happens already today with the js compilers.
For local development this works quite well - even better than with
dart2js (see dart2js issues in [0]).
We do have some follow-up items for source maps in dart2wasm compiler,
see [1]
[0]
[flutter/flutter/issues/151641](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/151641)
[1]
[dart-lang/sdk/issues/56232](https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/56232)
Stop trying to roll the dependencies for native assets automatically.
They are under active development (pre 1.0.0), and have frequent breaking changes. I'll be rolling these manually.
(We have the same setup in the Dart SDK, not auto-rolling dart-lang/native via DEPS.)
Related comment:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/151539#issuecomment-2221134824
Stop running link hooks in debug mode.
Rationale: link hooks only get access to tree-shaking info in release builds, so they can't do anything meaningful in debug builds. Debug builds should be fast as development cycle, so running less is better.
More details:
* https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/1252
Also: rolls packages to latest versions.
## Implementation details
The decision whether linking is enabled is made as follows:
* For normal builds `build_info.dart::BuildMode` is used to determine whether Dart is compiled in JIT or AOT mode.
* Testers always run in JIT, so no linking.
* Native asset dry runs only run for JIT builds (e.g only when hot reload and hot restart are enabled).
## Testing
The integration test is updated to output an asset for linking if `BuildConfig.linkingEnabled` is true, and to output an asset for bundling directly if linking is not enabled.
These changes allow to override existing native endorsed (federated & inline) plugins with e.g. non-endorsed plugin implementations via direct dependencies as described in the section *Platform implementation selection* in the [design doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LD7QjmzJZLCopUrFAAE98wOUQpjmguyGTN2wd_89Srs).
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
name: example
dependencies:
my_plugin: ^0.0.1
my_plugin_android_alternative: ^0.0.1
```
Closes#80374, closes#59657
Related: Override Dart plugins (#87991, #79669)
While exploring https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/107607, I noticed that flutter_tools test results change based on whether `dart test` is run from a terminal or from a process (such as a Dart program). I also ran into this while writing tests for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150667.
This is due to tests that rely on the global `Stdio` instance, on which the `hasTerminal` property depends on whether the tool is being invoked from a terminal.
Ideally, `testUsingContext` would require any tests that depend on `globals.stdio` to define an override for `Stdio`, but this is not the case. Until a solution to this more general problem is figured out, I think we should have `testUsingContext` always provide a `Stdio` override by default.
The current URL has 2 /to, but it should only be 1. However, this url redirects to https://docs.flutter.dev/release/breaking-changes/android-java-gradle-migration-guide, so I can change it to that if it's preferred just to go to the final destination - just don't know if it's a redirect for a reason
i didn't create an issue as it's a doc change, but if that's a requirement I can do that
This PR changes the project name logic for `flutter create` to look for the name in the pubspec.yaml `name` field,
before falling back to the directory name.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/53106
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150645 tries to shut down Chrome by sending a browser close command through a debug protocol. The webkit_inspection_protocol library used to send the command may throw a SocketException if Chrome has already been shut down.
This changes the mapping for the Dart SDK inside Flutter from `org-dartlang-sdk:///third_party/dart/sdk` to org-dartlang-sdk:///flutter/third_party/dart/sdk`. This URI changed in https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51917 but was not caught by tests because they only tested a specific set of mappings and there were no integration tests checking what URIs were actually produced by a running app.
So, this change also adds an integration tests that ensures that a real running app produces URIs that are then correctly mapped.
Fixes https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5164.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150969
Initiated by: goderbauer
Reason for reverting: Failing test in https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8743574743030691569/+/u/run_android_obfuscate_test/stdout
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
The Gradle Kotlin DSL also allows for type-safe application of the Flutter Gradle plugin, which is currently undetected by the CLI
```kotlin
plugins {
dev.flutter.`flutter-gradle-plugin`
}
```
Please note that the added test case isn't ideal, since the example gradle isn't actually valid kotlin DSL, however the `kotlin host app language with Gradle Kotlin DSL` is identical
Fixes#149859
If the user specifies the `--no-web-resources-cdn` or `--local-web-sdk`, we should use the local version of CanvasKit. `flutter.js` now has a flag that can be specified in the build configuration that tells it to load locally instead.
Also, added a link to the relevant docs in the web template warnings.
This addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148713
Also fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145559
This is a small refactor.
Using `loadPackageConfigWithLogging` seems wrong. We should be able to
assume that the flutter_tool package_config is in place.
Warm-up for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150196
Work towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/132712.
After this PR, after a completed `flutter build apk` command, we:
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-disabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is `'false'`.
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-disabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is _missing_.
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-enabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is `'true'`.
We will need to change the default (see `_impellerEnabledByDefault` in `project.dart`) before releasing, otherwise we will misreport `manifest-impeller-disabled` at a much higher rate than actual. If there is a way to instead compute the default instead of hard-coding, that would have been good.
See <https://docs.flutter.dev/perf/impeller#android> for details on the key-value pair.
---
I also did a tad of TLC, by removing the (now-defunct) `Usage` events for `flutter build ios`, so they are consistent.
/cc @zanderso, @chinmaygarde, @jonahwilliams
The previous approach of killing the Chromium parent process sometimes caused leaks of child processes on Windows. The Browser.close command in the debug protocol will tell Chromium to shut down all of its processes.
Two issues I noticed when I hit the issue at https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149258
1. When the an app.stop event arrives from Flutter with an error, DAP does not pass that error back to the client so there's no visibility of the error.
2. If app.stop occurs but no app.start ever did, we leave the progress notification hanging around
This fixes both by handling app.stop and closing any open launch progress as well as passing any error to the client.
Fixes https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5124
Even though this does not fix the below issue lets land this anyway as not logging to stderr when clearing logs makes sense to me.
related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150093
The test added is bad. It does not verify the behavior changed.
To verify the behavior changed correctly I would need to modify the generic device class to have clearLogs be an async function like many of the other calls. That would mean modifying every other device type and their implementations and their tests. Then I would need to update android_device to expose its logger. That is more than I have time for to validate a 2% flake error.
Feel free to disagree in the comments on this pr.
Removes these two discontinued plugins from `dev/integration_tests/flutter_gallery`
[`device_info`](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info):
Apparently the video playback doesn't work on iOS simulators (I wasn't able to verify this, as I don't have an iOS simulator installed). I removed the guard against running on those simulators, and replaced with a note in the README.
[`connectivity`](https://pub.dev/packages/connectivity):
This plugin was used to play the bee video from the network. I changed the demo so that the bee video is instead also played from an asset (like its friend the butterfly), and then removed the use of the plugin.
Unblocks the re-land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53462 (itself a reland ð), because of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150465#issuecomment-2181403712.
PR to pave the way for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53001 to re-land
Summary:
- Enforces use of Kotlin >= `1.7.0` (please see below note)
- Fixes ci failures that prevented the above PR from landing.
Details:
Because it landed initially, we are able to fake the roll in this PR to fix all the tests ([see my comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149204#discussion_r1617924772)).
Fixes all the tests that failed:
1. `module_test` failing on multiple platforms (3/9 of the failures).
Failure is
```
> Android resource linking failed
ERROR:/b/s/w/ir/x/t/flutter_module_test.KECMXW/hello/.android/plugins_build_output/device_info/intermediates/merged_res/release/values/values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.
```
This is a rather unhelpful error message but some [folks online suggest](https://stackoverflow.com/a/69050529) that upgrading your `compileSdk` version fixes this.
These resolve when I remove the dependency on the long discontinued [package_info](https://pub.dev/packages/package_info) and [device_info](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info) packages, perhaps because they are transitively pulling in low `compileSdk` versions? This is unclear to me.
2. `module_custom_host_app_name_test` was failing for the same reason (another 3/9, or cumulative 6/9).
3. `tool_integration_tests_3_4` was a flake ð (7/9)
4. `framework_tests_slow` needed a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin (the flutter tool tells us this, so I just upgraded as suggested) and it resolved (8/9)
5.`android_preview_tool_integration_tests` needed newer AGP and KGP versions. I also refactored the tests, and bumped our error versions, fixing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142653.
**Note that the bump to KGP is not in line with our policy** - we didn't warn for `1.5.0-1.6.x` for a release (or at all) before dropping support. But I think it might still be justified:
- The bump to our androidx libraries unblocks ongoing Scribe work, and also includes a fix for a [memory leak](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129307#issuecomment-1601636959) and a [crash on folding phones](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/114868#issuecomment-2133226962), among many other bug fixes.
- Gradle [doesn't test on half of that range](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#kotlin), and so we implicitly can't claim to support it either. More generally, our Java and Kotlin support ranges should probably strictly fall within what Gradle tests.
This adds the 'fail-fast' argument to flutter test, since dart test already supports this feature. Tests can now be stopped after first failure.
Fixes#124406
The original approach in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149609 didn't work when the Flutter Gradle plugin was applied using the deprecated script apply - the kotlin portion couldn't resolve the custom exception defined in `flutter.groovy`:
```
e: /Users/mackall/development/flutter/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:238:23: Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
e: /Users/mackall/development/flutter/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:263:23: Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
e: /Users/mackall/development/flutter/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:288:23: Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
e: /Users/mackall/development/flutter/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:313:23: Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
Warning: Flutter was unable to detect project Gradle, Java, AGP, and KGP versions. Skipping dependency version checking. Error was: org.gradle.internal.exceptions.LocationAwareException: Script '/Users/mackall/development/flutter/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts' line: 238
Script compilation errors:
Line 238: throw DependencyValidationException(errorMessage)
^ Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
Line 263: throw DependencyValidationException(errorMessage)
^ Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
Line 288: throw DependencyValidationException(errorMessage)
^ Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
Line 313: throw DependencyValidationException(errorMessage)
^ Unresolved reference: DependencyValidationException
```
This new approach of setting one of the [`extra` properties](https://docs.gradle.org/current/dsl/org.gradle.api.Project.html#N14FF7) works in both cases (tested with the `camera_android` example app, which uses the script apply, and a freshly created counter app).
It also removes some brittleness in that we don't have to unwrap the exception anymore, and aren't subject to breaking if Gradle decides one day to wrap our custom exception 1 layer deeper in additional exceptions.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145158.
In an ideal world, the `--machine` flag would be strictly a global flag which sub-commands can choose to use (or perhaps just to report a `toolExit` that they don't have a `--machine` supported-mode if not. However currently, there is both a global flag, and command-specific flags.
This leads to the confusing scenario where:
```sh
flutter devices --machine
```
... still checks for a Flutter update, printing a banner and breaking the JSON output.
This PR "fixes" that by allowing `--machine` _anywhere_ in the command-line arguments to suppress the check.
/cc @johnmccutchan.
Currently, the error message displayed to regenerate the lockfiles gives a Unix-like command ./gradlew, which will be incorrect for Windows environments. This PR uses globals.platform.isWindows to give the appropriate command.
closes#136763
- When `--web-renderer` is omitted, keep the value `null` until it later materializes to either `canvaskit` or `skwasm`.
- No more hardcoded defaults anywhere. We use `WebRendererMode.defaultForJs/defaultForWasm` instead.
- When in `--wasm` mode, the JS fallback is now `canvaskit` instead of `auto`.
- Add test for defaulting to `skwasm` when `--wasm` is enabled.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149826
This reverts commit 9d1de7b674.
Reverts due to log spam and crashing of the dependency version checker (which doesn't block the build but still isn't the desired outcome).
If the service is disposed when we make calls on it, we need to bubble up an exception that is understood by the callers.
This is another speculative fix for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149238.
Unpin `archive` version and run `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade` to show there are no additional dependencies pulled in (url_launcher was updated, but unrelated).
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149427
In service of #146879. In summary, a bunch of `printTrace` calls were added to try to troubleshoot this flake, but the flake has stopped happening.
This PR more-or-less reverts https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148596, since this was the only change that could have _theoretically_ (somehow maybe) stopped the flake. I'll consider reverting the rest of the `printTrace` calls if the flake does not reappear after this PR lands.
The application of the `dependency_version_checker` gradle plugin is wrapped in a try catch, which prevented blocking the build in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149204. This pr re-throws the errors we intended to throw.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149386. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106150.
The stocks test app includes Dart files containing localized messages generated by `package:flutter_localizations`. However, these files appear to have become out of date. Running `pub get` in the project will regenerate these files and generate a diff, which can be annoying when working on the repo.
This PR generates the files. ~~It also updates the templates for these files to be compliant with flutter/flutter repo lint rules, including `noop_primitive_operations` and `use_super_parameters`.~~ It also adds `// ignore_for_file: type=lint` to these files to disable linting for these files. This avoids issues like https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106150 and [this](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148741#issuecomment-2141161753).
After upgrading flutter to the latest version (3.22.1), I encountered an error when building with `--split-per-abi`:
```
[ +1 ms] FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
[ ] * Where:
[ ] Script '/home/runar/snap/flutter/common/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/groovy/flutter.groovy' line: 1182
[ ] * What went wrong:
[ ] A problem occurred evaluating root project 'android'.
[ ] > A problem occurred configuring project ':app'.
[ ] > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.typehandling.GroovyCastException: Cannot cast object 'null' with class 'null' to class 'int'.
Try 'java.lang.Integer' instead
```
This PR changes the type used from `ìnt` to `Integer` which is what's used in the `ABI_VERSION` map.
Manual recreation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148911
Entire PR is just the output of
```
flutter update-packages --force-upgrade
```
followed by (run from the root of the flutter repo)
```
find . -type d -name 'android' | dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
Dart2wasm only needs a platform file, which contains the compiled
`dart:*` libraries. There's no need to specify a seperate `--dart-sdk`
option (anymore).
(See also https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/366821)
This PR modifies the `flutter create --empty` command to not delete the `test/` folder when run on an existing app project.
Before:
```bash
flutter create my_app --empty
mkdir my_app/test
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
flutter create my_app --empty
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test does not exist
```
After:
```bash
flutter create my_app --empty
mkdir my_app/test
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
flutter create my_app --empty
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134928
This PR adds support invoking `link.dart` hooks.
Link hooks can add new assets. Link hooks can transform assets sent to link hook from build hooks.
This PR does not yet add support for getting tree-shake information in the link hooks. This is pending on defining the `resources.json` format (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/55494).
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146263
## Implementation considerations
The build hooks could be run before Dart compilation and the link hooks after Dart compilation. (This is how it's done in Dart standalone.) However, due to the way the `Target`s are set up, this would require two targets and serializing and deserializing the `BuildResult` in between these. This would lead to more code but no benefits. Currently there is nothing that mandates running build hooks before Dart compilation.
## Testing
* The unit tests verify that the native_assets_builder `link` and `linkDryRun` would be invoked with help of the existing fake.
* The native assets integration test now also invokes an FFI call of a package that adds the asset during the link hook instead of the build hook.
* In order to keep coverage of the `flutter create --template=package_ffi`, `flutter create` is still run and the extra dependency is added and an extra ffi call is added. (Open to alternative suggestions.)
This PR adds a new flag `default-flavor` in the `flutter` section of `pubspec.yaml`. It allows developers of multi-flavor android apps to specify a default flavor to be used for `flutter run`, `flutter build` etc.
Using `flutter run` on flavored apps already works without specifying `--flavor` already works on iOS (it defaults to the `runner` schema), so I (and others in #22856) figured this would be nice to have.
fixes#22856
Newer Gradle/AGP versions include the following warnings:
```
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:107:40: Variable 'agpVersion' initializer is redundant
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:108:40: Variable 'kgpVersion' initializer is redundant
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:143:28: Parameter 'project' is never used
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:152:40: Variable 'agpVersion' initializer is redundant
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:167:55: 'Version' is deprecated. Deprecated in Java
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:195:56: Unnecessary non-null assertion (!!) on a non-null receiver of type Any
w: file:///Users/goderbauer/dev/flutter/packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/main/kotlin/dependency_version_checker.gradle.kts:344:28: The corresponding parameter in the supertype 'Comparable' is named 'other'. This may cause problems when calling this function with named arguments.
```
These also get printed out to the CLI, so they are somewhat annoying.
Fixes all of the warnings, except for `'Version' is deprecated. Deprecated in Java`, which gets suppressed (we are intentionally using the deprecated `Version`, to help support older versions of AGP that use that deprecated class).
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148354
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147142
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147144
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
`'flutter create should tool exit if the template manifest cannot be read'` fails consistently, as shown by #148614.
The test expects a `ToolExit` with the message "Unable to read the template manifest", but depending on how the test is being run, a different exception ("Cannot create a project within the Flutter SDK") is sometimes thrown first.
This pull request relocates the test project to `dev/` to prevent the extraneous error.
This PR is step 12 in the journey to solve issue #136139 and make the
entire Flutter repo more readable.
Most of it involves implementing switch expressions, and there's also a
few other random things that I wanted to clean up a bit.
Adds an empty privacy manifest, and commented out code to include it in the build, to the plugin template. This will make it much easier to explain how to add a privacy manifest in plugin docs, since instead of explaining the format of the file from scratch and providing example code to inculde it, we can just instruct people to add entries to an exisitng file and then uncomment a line or two. This will also make it much easier to figure out from the template output itself how to add support for people who don't find the documentation.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131940
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140013
DDS was temporarily pinned to 4.1.0 because 4.2.0 triggered some test
failures (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147250). Those
failures should be fixed by vm_service 14.2.2, so this unpins DDS and
rolls both of these packages (along with devtools_shared, which is a DDS
dependency).
(If the bot updates vm_service before this is done, I can rebase over
that will reduce the size of this PR to just a few files)
### Some background:
* Flutter registers the hot-restart service extension for all devices **except** web devices. For web devices, DWDS registers the service extensions.
* When a user is debugging their code via VS Code, the VS Code Dart extension [sends a hot-restart](94cb81c552/src/debug/run_daemon_base.ts (L100)) request via stdin/out to flutter_tools
* flutter_tools then [calls the "hotRestart" service extension](f3978c7a46/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/isolated/resident_web_runner.dart (L447)) (which, again, has been registered by DWDS)
### Why is this change necessary?
In DWDS, we are changing how we register the "hotRestart" service extension (here is the PR for that: https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/pull/2388). Previously, we registered the "hotRestart" service extension on a client that was directly connected to the VmService. With https://github.com/dart-lang/webdev/pull/2388, we will be registering the "hotRestart" service extension on a client that is connected to DDS.
When a service extension is registered against DDS, DDS adds a prefix to the service extension method name (e.g. "hotRestart" becomes "s0.hotRestart"). It informs clients of the service extension name via `kServiceRegistered` events sent to the `Service` stream.
Therefore, this change simply listens to those service extension registered events, and uses them to determine the "hotRestart" service extension's method name.
Part of #137040 and #80374
- Extracted getting plugin implementation candidates and the default implementation to its own method
- Extracted resolving the plugin implementation to its own method
- Simplify candidate selection algorithm
- Support overriding inline dart implementation for an app-facing plugin
- Throw error, if a federated plugin implements an app-facing plugin, but also references a default implementation
- Throw error, if a plugin provides an inline implementation, but also references a default implementation
Fix dependency tracking in the build.
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147643
## Testing
It's not clear to me where to test the caching behavior of specific targets.
* test/general.shard/build_system/targets/common_test.dart
* This doesn't test the caching behavior of any targets
* test/general.shard/build_system/build_system_test.dart
* test/general.shard/cache_test.dart
* Both of these don't test specific `Target`s, these have `TestTarget`s.
* test/integration.shard/isolated/native_assets_test.dart
* This could work, but it's an integration test that already takes long to run.
This PR resolves#147806
- List plugin that want to be compiled against a higher Android SDK version
- List plugins that depend on a different NDK version (we don't have a way to compare them)
- Small formatting and wording improvements
- Update syntax to work for both Groovy and Kotlin
- If project uses `build.gradle.kts`, then it is mentioned in the warning message (previously always `build.gradle` was mentioned)
<img width="1209" alt="demo" src="https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/40357511/be3522b5-d1b4-4983-9fed-8aaa0f0bc7f7">
This pull request aims for improved readability, based on issue #146600.
```dart
// before
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
final List<SupportedPlatform> platforms = includeRoot
? <SupportedPlatform>[SupportedPlatform.root]
: <SupportedPlatform>[];
if (android.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.android);
}
if (ios.exists) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.ios);
}
if (web.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.web);
}
if (macos.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.macos);
}
if (linux.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.linux);
}
if (windows.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.windows);
}
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) {
platforms.add(SupportedPlatform.fuchsia);
}
return platforms;
}
// after
List<SupportedPlatform> getSupportedPlatforms({bool includeRoot = false}) {
return <SupportedPlatform>[
if (includeRoot) SupportedPlatform.root,
if (android.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.android,
if (ios.exists) SupportedPlatform.ios,
if (web.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.web,
if (macos.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.macos,
if (linux.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.linux,
if (windows.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.windows,
if (fuchsia.existsSync()) SupportedPlatform.fuchsia,
];
}
```
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146879 and https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145812. In these issues, we see what appears to be the flutter tool getting stuck somewhere during hot reload. It may help if we knew were exactly where we are getting stuck (preparing assets, writing them to device, etc.).
This PR adds a new parameter to `FlutterTestDriver::run`, `verbose`. When verbose is set, `FlutterTestDriver` will run `flutter` with `--verbose` in its tests. Keep in mind that `FlutterTestDriver` only prints logs from `flutter` when a test fails, so this shouldn't spam the logs of passing tests.
This PR sets the parameter when invoking the flaky tests from https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146879 and #145812, so we should see more detailed logs in future flakes.
While this is a low risk PR, you can verify the change by intentionally breaking hot reload code, clearing the cached tool binaries, and then running either of these tests.
## Description
This introduces a list of packages that we will explicitly not pin. It is to be used for things where the package isn't actually published, but is a transitive dependency of another package included in the SDK. This happens with the `macros` package, for instance, which depends on the private, unpublished, `_macros` package where the SDK does some tricky things to depend on it (it depends on "any", but ships it as part of the SDK).
Also ran `flutter update-packages --force-update` to update all of the pubspec files.
## Related Issues
- Fixes#147656
## Tests
- Added a test that makes sure that explicitly unpinned packages don't show up in the pinned list.
- added language for all code blocks
- replaced `bash` or `shell` with `sh` for consistency.
- added `sh` and `console` in the GitHub template link generator.
- updated test for GitHub template.
Uses kernel concatenation to concatenate the `program.dill` and `native_assets.dill`.
This will enable compiling `native_assets.dill` after `program.dill` so that tree-shaking information can be used.
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146270
## Implementation choices
* We can either run the frontend_server twice as a process invocation (current PR), or keep the process running after the dart compilation and then shut it down after native assets compilation to kernel. Keeping the process running would require more coordination between different `Target`s.
* We can either chose to only do separate kernel file compilation in release (AOT) builds, or do it both for JIT and AOT (current PR). Doing it differently in JIT/AOT means more conditionals in lib/src/build_system/targets/, doing it single-shot in JIT might be more performant though.
Update: Both of these are mitigated by not running the kernel compiler process if there are no native assets at all.
## Implementation notes
This only updates `flutter assemble`.
The kernel compilation calls in `flutter run` do not require kernel concatenation. The native-assets-kernel-mapping in `flutter run` contains results from `--dry-run` invocations of `hook/build.dart` (and in the future `hook/link.dart`). These `--dry-run` invocations do not get access to tree-shaking information, so the `link` hook to be introduced later can be run before Dart compilation.
## Tests
* Updated the `Target`s tests to reflect the new implementation.
## Related CLs
* frontend_server support: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/363567
* Same PR for Dart standalone: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/362384
When Swift Package Manager feature is enabled, create app and create plugin will have Swift Package Manager integration already added and will not need to undergo a migration.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146371.
```
flutter config --enable-swift-package-manager
flutter create --ios-language swift --platforms ios,macos swift_app_name
flutter create --ios-language objc --platforms ios objc_app_name
flutter create --template=plugin --ios-language swift --platforms ios,macos swift_plugin_name
flutter create --template=plugin --ios-language objc --platforms ios objc_plugin_name
```
Here's another PR with a couple of typos fixed. As you can see there was a typo in _fileReferenceI**n**dentifiers_, in class _ParsedProjectInfo._ Maybe we should do some check on that since I'm not sure if that property is used somewhere outside Flutter?
From https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348#issuecomment-2016047148:
> before we ship, we should add a printTrace to the tool about each asset transformer we're invoking and the path/arguments we called it with
I think this is a good idea since asset transformers can be arbitrary Dart programsâmeaning that a lot can go wrong when running them. For example, they can hang indefinitely or perform some sort of I/O that later results in a tool crash. Knowing that asset transformation was involved when debugging a crash (or a slow/stuck `flutter build`) could be useful, so I think adding a `printTrace` or two is a good idea (or at least not a bad one).
