Change the following in the `flutter create` templates. I didn't make any auto-migrations for existing apps because none seem that critical:
1. Turn on `ASSETCATALOG_COMPILER_GENERATE_SWIFT_ASSET_SYMBOL_EXTENSIONS` in iOS and macOS.
1. Turn on `BuildIndependentTargetsInParallel` in macOS template. https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/125827/files#r1181817619
1. Turn on `DEAD_CODE_STRIPPING` in macOS template.
1. Set `ENABLE_USER_SCRIPT_SANDBOXING=NO` in iOS and macOS template. `flutter` scripts don't work with this on. This might require a migration in the future to explicitly turn this one off. However at least for now if the setting isn't present it defaults to `NO`.
Add migration for `LastUpgradeVersion` so users won't see these validation issues in Xcode.
Run migrator on all the example apps. A few aren't Flutter apps so I edited them in Xcode.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140253
See also https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/125817 and https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/90304.
Partially resolves[^1] https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/139774.
Effectively reverts https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/125581.
The main change here is that I deleted and recreated the macos Xcode project for this integration test (hence the large diff). I tried fixing the existing project first, but it was set up quite differently, andâfor whatever reasonâthe integration test would get stuck trying to load `dev/integration_tests/flavors/integration_test/integration_test.dart`.
I verified that this works locally, but I don't know if it's possible to run this on the devicelab try pool to verify that it works on devicelab hardware.
[^1]: I would not close the issue until 1) this PR lands, 2) the integration test consistently passes on CI, and 3) macOS support for flavors is publicly documented.
1. Move leak_tracker and leak_tracker_testing out of direct dependencies.
2. Move leak_tracker_flutter_testing from dev to prod dependencies for flutter_test
It is prerequisite for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/135856
Pinning the package:web dependency constrains downstream packages from
using newer versions and making sure they support the version pinned in
Flutter. Since the usage of package:web in Flutter is light, we should
instead have a small shim like the engine and keep package:web as a dev
dependency only.
Reverts flutter/flutter#132985
Initiated by: christopherfujino
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Provides support for conditional bundling of assets through the existing `--flavor` option for `flutter build` and `flutter run`. Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21682. Resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136092
## Change
Within the `assets` section pubspec.yaml, the user can now specify one or more `flavors` that an asset belongs to. Consider this example:
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
flutter:
assets:
- assets/normal-asset.png
- path: assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- strawberry
```
With this pubspec,
* `flutter run --flavor vanilla` will not include `assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png` in the build output.
* `flutter run --flavor strawberry` will not include `assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png`.
* `flutter run` will only include `assets/normal-asset.png`.
## Open questions
* Should this be supported for all platforms, or should this change be limited to ones with documented `--flavor` support (Android, iOS, and (implicitly) MacOS)? This PR currently only enables this feature for officially supported platforms.
## Design thoughts, what this PR does not do, etc.
### This does not provide an automatic mapping/resolution of asset keys/paths to others based on flavor at runtime.
The implementation in this PR represents a simplest approach. Notably, it does not give Flutter the ability to dynamically choose an asset based on flavor using a single asset key. For example, one can't use `Image.asset('config.json')` to dynamically choose between different "flavors" of `config.json` (such as `dev-flavor/config.json` or `prod-flavor/config.json`). However, a user could always implement such a mechanism in their project or in a library by examining the flavor at runtime.
### When multiple entries affect the same file and 1) at least one of these entries have a `flavors` list provided and 2) these lists are not equivalent, we always consider the manifest to be ambiguous and will throw a `ToolExit`.
<details>
For example, these manifests would all be considered ambiguous:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/
- path: assets/vanilla.png
flavors:
- vanilla
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/vanilla/cherry.png
flavor:
- cherry
# Thinking towards the future where we might add glob/regex support and more conditions other than flavor:
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/**
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/**/ios/**
platforms:
- ios
# Ambiguous in the case of assets like "assets/vanilla/ios/icon.svg" since we
# don't know if flavor `vanilla` and platform `ios` should be combined using or-logic or and-logic.
```
See [this review comment thread](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/132985#discussion_r1381909942) for the full story on how I arrived at this decision.
</details>
### This does not support Android's multidimensional flavors feature (in an intuitive way)
<details>
Conder this excerpt from a Flutter project's android/app/build.gradle file:
```groovy
android {
// ...
flavorDimensions "mode", "api"
productFlavors {
free {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".free"
}
premium {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".premium"
}
minApi23 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi23"
}
minApi21 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi21"
}
}
}
```
In this setup, the following values are valid `--flavor` are valid `freeMinApi21`, `freeMinApi23`, `premiumMinApi21`, and `premiumMinApi23`. We call these values "flavor combinations". Consider the following from the Android documentation[^1]:
> In addition to the source set directories you can create for each individual product flavor and build variant, you can also create source set directories for each combination of product flavors. For example, you can create and add Java sources to the src/demoMinApi24/java/ directory, and Gradle uses those sources only when building a variant that combines those two product flavors.
>
> Source sets you create for product flavor combinations have a higher priority than source sets that belong to each individual product flavor. To learn more about source sets and how Gradle merges resources, read the section about how to [create source sets](https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#sourcesets).
This feature will not behave in this way. If a user utilizes this feature and also Android's multidimensional flavors feature, they will have to list out all flavor combinations that contain the flavor they want to limit an asset to:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/free/
flavors:
- freeMinApi21
- freeMinApi23
```
This is mostly due to a technical limitation in the hot-reload feature of `flutter run`. During a hot reload, the tool will try to update the asset bundle on the device, but the tool does not know the flavors contained within the flavor combination (that the user passes to `--flavor`). Gradle is the source of truth of what flavors were involved in the build, and `flutter run` currently does not access to that information since it's an implementation detail of the build process. We could bubble up this information, but it would require a nontrivial amount of engineering work, and it's unclear how desired this functionality is. It might not be worth implementing.
</details>
See https://flutter.dev/go/flavor-specific-assets for the (outdated) design document.
<summary>Pre-launch Checklist</summary>
</details>
[^1]: https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#flavor-dimensions
Provides support for conditional bundling of assets through the existing `--flavor` option for `flutter build` and `flutter run`. Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21682. Resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136092
## Change
Within the `assets` section pubspec.yaml, the user can now specify one or more `flavors` that an asset belongs to. Consider this example:
```yaml
# pubspec.yaml
flutter:
assets:
- assets/normal-asset.png
- path: assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png
flavors:
- strawberry
```
With this pubspec,
* `flutter run --flavor vanilla` will not include `assets/strawberry/ice-cream.png` in the build output.
* `flutter run --flavor strawberry` will not include `assets/vanilla/ice-cream.png`.
* `flutter run` will only include `assets/normal-asset.png`.
## Open questions
* Should this be supported for all platforms, or should this change be limited to ones with documented `--flavor` support (Android, iOS, and (implicitly) MacOS)? This PR currently only enables this feature for officially supported platforms.
## Design thoughts, what this PR does not do, etc.
### This does not provide an automatic mapping/resolution of asset keys/paths to others based on flavor at runtime.
The implementation in this PR represents a simplest approach. Notably, it does not give Flutter the ability to dynamically choose an asset based on flavor using a single asset key. For example, one can't use `Image.asset('config.json')` to dynamically choose between different "flavors" of `config.json` (such as `dev-flavor/config.json` or `prod-flavor/config.json`). However, a user could always implement such a mechanism in their project or in a library by examining the flavor at runtime.
### When multiple entries affect the same file and 1) at least one of these entries have a `flavors` list provided and 2) these lists are not equivalent, we always consider the manifest to be ambiguous and will throw a `ToolExit`.
<details>
For example, these manifests would all be considered ambiguous:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/
- path: assets/vanilla.png
flavors:
- vanilla
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/vanilla/cherry.png
flavor:
- cherry
# Thinking towards the future where we might add glob/regex support and more conditions other than flavor:
assets:
- path: assets/vanilla/**
flavors:
- vanilla
- path: assets/**/ios/**
platforms:
- ios
# Ambiguous in the case of assets like "assets/vanilla/ios/icon.svg" since we
# don't know if flavor `vanilla` and platform `ios` should be combined using or-logic or and-logic.
```
See [this review comment thread](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/132985#discussion_r1381909942) for the full story on how I arrived at this decision.
</details>
### This does not support Android's multidimensional flavors feature (in an intuitive way)
<details>
Conder this excerpt from a Flutter project's android/app/build.gradle file:
```groovy
android {
// ...
flavorDimensions "mode", "api"
productFlavors {
free {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".free"
}
premium {
dimension "mode"
applicationIdSuffix ".premium"
}
minApi23 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi23"
}
minApi21 {
dimension "api"
versionNameSuffix "-minApi21"
}
}
}
```
In this setup, the following values are valid `--flavor` are valid `freeMinApi21`, `freeMinApi23`, `premiumMinApi21`, and `premiumMinApi23`. We call these values "flavor combinations". Consider the following from the Android documentation[^1]:
> In addition to the source set directories you can create for each individual product flavor and build variant, you can also create source set directories for each combination of product flavors. For example, you can create and add Java sources to the src/demoMinApi24/java/ directory, and Gradle uses those sources only when building a variant that combines those two product flavors.
>
> Source sets you create for product flavor combinations have a higher priority than source sets that belong to each individual product flavor. To learn more about source sets and how Gradle merges resources, read the section about how to [create source sets](https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#sourcesets).
This feature will not behave in this way. If a user utilizes this feature and also Android's multidimensional flavors feature, they will have to list out all flavor combinations that contain the flavor they want to limit an asset to:
```yaml
assets:
- assets/free/
flavors:
- freeMinApi21
- freeMinApi23
```
This is mostly due to a technical limitation in the hot-reload feature of `flutter run`. During a hot reload, the tool will try to update the asset bundle on the device, but the tool does not know the flavors contained within the flavor combination (that the user passes to `--flavor`). Gradle is the source of truth of what flavors were involved in the build, and `flutter run` currently does not access to that information since it's an implementation detail of the build process. We could bubble up this information, but it would require a nontrivial amount of engineering work, and it's unclear how desired this functionality is. It might not be worth implementing.
</details>
See https://flutter.dev/go/flavor-specific-assets for the (outdated) design document.
<summary>Pre-launch Checklist</summary>
</details>
[^1]: https://developer.android.com/build/build-variants#flavor-dimensions
Updates Gradle version for Flutter project templates and integration tests to at least 7.6.3 (changed all of those with versions below it) to fix security vulnerability.
Part of fix for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/138336.
Upgrades agp versions and lockfiles for `dev/`. Also changes the lockfile generation script to represent the newer form of the `settings.gradle` template, and therefore also propagates these changes.
~~Potentially related to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134419~~, but worth doing anyways. (not actually related)
Addresses #63507, and is a follow up to the engine PR https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/46857
Changes the font family string when attempting to use Apple system fonts to the new proxies added by the engine. For the "Text" font this will be more secure in the future against possible changes to Apple's API. For the "Display" font, this will now work correctly when it didn't before.
I checked the letter spacing values against a native app for all font sizes between 17-28. I made a few adjustments to better match native, but especially for the "Text" font we were either really close, or close enough to not make a large breaking change to default fonts worth it.
| Before | After |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| <img width="466" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 11 45 12â¯AM" src="https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/58190796/627ed8ac-d848-4f71-aa62-a467b8aac62d"> | <img width="383" alt="Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 11 46 25â¯AM" src="https://github.com/flutter/flutter/assets/58190796/9a502021-7d2b-4e14-98f1-86971b3830a5"> |
The smaller text in both the before and after should be the same. The large system font that Flutter used before was incorrect, which caused it to look more spread out. Now we use the correct font.
Reverts flutter/flutter#139101
Initiated by: jonahwilliams
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/138837
I reverted too many config files, the app needed the pbx project file in order to find the new class I added. Instead, just put the new platform view in the app delegate so it builds.
I previously made a PR (#136140) that used `switch` expressions to make some parts of the Flutter codebase easier to understand. It was assigned to the framework team, and @christopherfujino let me know that it was too large to effectively review and recommended breaking it up into smaller pull requests.
Here's a PR that only targets files in the `dev/` directory. Hopefully this will be easier to work with!
(solves issue https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136139)
Reland of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/138837
I reverted too many config files, the app needed the pbx project file in order to find the new class I added. Instead, just put the new platform view in the app delegate so it builds.
Reverts flutter/flutter#138837
Initiated by: jonahwilliams
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
In https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48190 I discovered that overlay surfaces were not constructed with wide gamut settings. This adds a test that will fail until this is fixed.
In https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/48190 I discovered that overlay surfaces were not constructed with wide gamut settings. This adds a test that will fail until this is fixed.
This version is needed so that dart:js_interop can move to extension
types. Also adds some code to handle some breaking changes:
- Body -> Response. Body was an IDL interface mixin type we exposed in
dart:html. Going forward, users should either use Request or Response.
- Casts to JSAny. These are temporary until we move package:web types to
extension types. Currently, package:web types can't implement JSObject
as JSObject will move to be an extension type itself.
Co-authored-by: Kevin Moore <kevmoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts flutter/flutter#137191
Initiated by: camsim99
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Adds support for Android 34 in the following ways:
- Bumps integration tests compile SDK versions 33 --> 34
- Bumps template compile SDK version 33 --> 34
- Also changes deprecated `compileSdkVersion` to `compileSdk`
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134220
Adds support for Android 34 in the following ways:
- Bumps integration tests compile SDK versions 33 --> 34
- Bumps template compile SDK version 33 --> 34
- Also changes deprecated `compileSdkVersion` to `compileSdk`
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134220
Fixes in preparation for https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/330561.
The change referenced above tightens the `use_build_context_synchronously` to ensure that `mounted` is checked on the appropriate `BuildContext` or `State`. This change fixes up the flutter/flutter in preparation of this new enforcement.
Analyzer's dependency on autosnapshotting causes issues.
Because every version of integration_test from sdk depends on leak_tracker from hosted and autosnapshotting depends on leak_tracker from path, integration_test from sdk is forbidden.
So, because autosnapshotting depends on integration_test from sdk, version solving failed.
## Description
This PR adds a `nonce` parameter to flutter.js' `loadEntrypoint` method.
When set, loadEntrypoint will add a `nonce` attribute to the `main.dart.js` script tag, which allows Flutter to run in environments slightly more restricted by CSP; those that don't add `'self'` as a valid source for `script-src`.
----
### CSP directive
After this change, the CSP directive for a Flutter Web index.html can be:
```
script-src 'nonce-YOUR_NONCE_VALUE' 'wasm-unsafe-eval';
font-src https://fonts.gstatic.com;
style-src 'nonce-YOUR_NONCE_VALUE';
```
When CSP is set via a `meta` tag (like in the test accompanying this change), and to use a service worker, the CSP needs an additional directive: [`worker-src 'self';`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Security-Policy/worker-src)
When CSP set via response headers, the CSP that applies to `flutter_service_worker.js` is determined by its response headers. See **Web Workers API > [Content security policy](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Workers_API/Using_web_workers#content_security_policy)** in MDN.)
----
### Initialization
If the CSP is set to disallow `script-src 'self'`, a nonce needs to also be passed to `loadEntrypoint`:
```javascript
_flutter.loader.loadEntrypoint({
nonce: 'SOME_NONCE',
onEntrypointLoaded: (engineInitializer) async {
const appRunner = await engineInitializer.initializeEngine({
nonce: 'SOME_NONCE',
});
appRunner.runApp();
},
});
```
(`nonce` shows twice for now, because the entrypoint loader script doesn't have direct access to the `initializeEngine` call.)
----
## Tests
* Added a smoke test to ensure an app configured as described above starts.
## Issues
* Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126977
Resolves#128046.
Adds a services API that allows flutter app developers to write app code that determines `--flavor` the app was built with.
This is implemented by having the tool adding the value of `--flavor` to its list of dart environment declarations, which will be available to the app at run time. Specifically,`FLUTTER_APP_FLAVOR` is set. I chose this implementation for its simplicity. There is some precedent for this, but only for web ([example](cd2f3f5e78/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/runner/flutter_command.dart (L1231))).
This PR fixes yet another case in the windows startup test that violates the render rule, which caused https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/45300 to be reverted.
Although the `FlutterView.render` call is within `onBeginFrame`, there is an `await` before the call, causing the call to fall out of the synchronous scope.
I've added this problem to the documentation of `FlutterView.render` in https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/45555.
This should fix https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134636.
The column can get really tall, especially when there's line wrapping. This is the layout on a tablet, so on a motor g4 this column is likely going to overflow.
```
RenderParagraph#66251 relayoutBoundary=up3
â creator: RichText â Text-[<'status'>] â Column â
â FutureBuilder<TestStepResult> â Padding â
â KeyedSubtree-[GlobalKey#0f29e] â _BodyBuilder â MediaQuery â
â LayoutId-[<_ScaffoldSlot.body>] â CustomMultiChildLayout â
â _ActionsScope â Actions â â¯
| parentData: offset=Offset(0.0, 600.0); flex=null; fit=null
```
Support for FFI calls with `@Native external` functions through Native assets on MacOS and iOS. This enables bundling native code without any build-system boilerplate code.
For more info see:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129757
### Implementation details for MacOS and iOS.
Dylibs are bundled by (1) making them fat binaries if multiple architectures are targeted, (2) code signing these, and (3) copying them to the frameworks folder. These steps are done manual rather than via CocoaPods. CocoaPods would have done the same steps, but (a) needs the dylibs to be there before the `xcodebuild` invocation (we could trick it, by having a minimal dylib in the place and replace it during the build process, that works), and (b) can't deal with having no dylibs to be bundled (we'd have to bundle a dummy dylib or include some dummy C code in the build file).
The dylibs are build as a new target inside flutter assemble, as that is the moment we know what build-mode and architecture to target.
The mapping from asset id to dylib-path is passed in to every kernel compilation path. The interesting case is hot-restart where the initial kernel file is compiled by the "inner" flutter assemble, while after hot restart the "outer" flutter run compiled kernel file is pushed to the device. Both kernel files need to contain the mapping. The "inner" flutter assemble gets its mapping from the NativeAssets target which builds the native assets. The "outer" flutter run get its mapping from a dry-run invocation. Since this hot restart can be used for multiple target devices (`flutter run -d all`) it contains the mapping for all known targets.
### Example vs template
The PR includes a new template that uses the new native assets in a package and has an app importing that. Separate discussion in: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131209.
### Tests
This PR adds new tests to cover the various use cases.
* dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/native_assets_ios.dart
* Runs an example app with native assets in all build modes, doing hot reload and hot restart in debug mode.
* dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/native_assets_ios_simulator.dart
* Runs an example app with native assets, doing hot reload and hot restart.
* packages/flutter_tools/test/integration.shard/native_assets_test.dart
* Runs (incl hot reload/hot restart), builds, builds frameworks for iOS, MacOS and flutter-tester.
* packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/build_system/targets/native_assets_test.dart
* Unit tests the new Target in the backend.
* packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/ios/native_assets_test.dart
* packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/macos/native_assets_test.dart
* Unit tests the native assets being packaged on a iOS/MacOS build.
It also extends various existing tests:
* dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/module_test_ios.dart
* Exercises the add2app scenario.
* packages/flutter_tools/test/general.shard/features_test.dart
* Unit test the new feature flag.
This enables our various date picker classes to have a null `initialDate`.
It also fixes the logic of some of the widgets which used to do something when you _changed_ the `initial*` parameters, which is wrong for `initial*` properties (they by definition should only impact the initial state) and wrong for properties in general (behaviour should not change based on whether the widget was built with a new value or not, that violates the reactive design principles).
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/638.
* Pulled `FinderBase` out of `Finder`
* `FinderBase` can be used for any object, not just elements
* Terminology was updated to be more "find" related
* Re-implemented `Finder` using `FinderBase<Element>`
* Backwards compatibility maintained with `_LegacyFinderMixin`
* Introduced base classes for SemanticsNode finders
* Introduced basic SemanticsNode finders through `find.semantics`
* Updated some relevant matchers to make use of the more generic `FinderBase`
Closes#123634Closes#115874
Implement expected functionalities when supplying `--web-launch-url` and/or `--web-hostname` arguments to `flutter drive`.
- `--web-launch-url` now sets the starting url for the (headless) browser
- Which for example means you can start at a certain part of the app at the start of your integration test
- `--web-hostname` now sets the hostname where the target of flutter drive will be hosted
- Which allows you to set something other than localhost (allowing access via a reverse-proxy for example)
Fixes#118028
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/132162.
I did a tiny bit of minor cleanup but didn't want to go 🍔 beyond the
scope of this change. After it lands I'll update the Wiki.
## Before
```bash
$ fl run \
--local-engine-src-path=$ENGINE \
--local-engine=android_debug_unopt_arm64
```
... would try to use `host_debug_unopt` (i.e. Rosetta).
## After
```bash
$ fl run \
--local-engine-src-path=$ENGINE \
--local-engine=android_debug_unopt_arm64 \
--local-engine-host=host_debug_unopt_arm64
```
... uses `host_debug_unopt_arm64`, as specified.
---
/cc @jonahwilliams @gaaclarke @zanderso
Migrate tests in flutter/flutter. Once the tests here and in `*_customer_testing` are migrated, the default value of the migration flag will be changed from false to true, making the rounding hack disabled by default.
This PR aims to support Android's predictive back gesture when popping the entire Flutter app. Predictive route transitions between routes inside of a Flutter app will come later.
<img width="200" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/389558/217918109-945febaa-9086-41cc-a476-1a189c7831d8.gif" />
### Trying it out
If you want to try this feature yourself, here are the necessary steps:
1. Run Android 33 or above.
1. Enable the feature flag for predictive back on the device under "Developer
options".
1. Create a Flutter project, or clone [my example project](https://github.com/justinmc/flutter_predictive_back_examples).
1. Set `android:enableOnBackInvokedCallback="true"` in
android/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (already done in the example project).
1. Check out this branch.
1. Run the app. Perform a back gesture (swipe from the left side of the
screen).
You should see the predictive back animation like in the animation above and be able to commit or cancel it.
### go_router support
go_router works with predictive back out of the box because it uses a Navigator internally that dispatches NavigationNotifications!
~~go_router can be supported by adding a listener to the router and updating SystemNavigator.setFrameworkHandlesBack.~~
Similar to with nested Navigators, nested go_routers is supported by using a PopScope widget.
<details>
<summary>Full example of nested go_routers</summary>
```dart
// Copyright 2014 The Flutter Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
import 'package:go_router/go_router.dart';
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter/scheduler.dart';
void main() => runApp(_MyApp());
class _MyApp extends StatelessWidget {
final GoRouter router = GoRouter(
routes: <RouteBase>[
GoRoute(
path: '/',
builder: (BuildContext context, GoRouterState state) => _HomePage(),
),
GoRoute(
path: '/nested_navigators',
builder: (BuildContext context, GoRouterState state) => _NestedGoRoutersPage(),
),
],
);
@override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return MaterialApp.router(
routerConfig: router,
);
}
}
class _HomePage extends StatelessWidget {
@override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
appBar: AppBar(
title: const Text('Nested Navigators Example'),
),
body: Center(
child: Column(
mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center,
children: <Widget>[
const Text('Home Page'),
const Text('A system back gesture here will exit the app.'),
const SizedBox(height: 20.0),
ListTile(
title: const Text('Nested go_router route'),
subtitle: const Text('This route has another go_router in addition to the one used with MaterialApp above.'),
onTap: () {
context.push('/nested_navigators');
},
),
],
),
),
);
}
}
class _NestedGoRoutersPage extends StatefulWidget {
@override
State<_NestedGoRoutersPage> createState() => _NestedGoRoutersPageState();
}
class _NestedGoRoutersPageState extends State<_NestedGoRoutersPage> {
late final GoRouter _router;
final GlobalKey<NavigatorState> _nestedNavigatorKey = GlobalKey<NavigatorState>();
// If the nested navigator has routes that can be popped, then we want to
// block the root navigator from handling the pop so that the nested navigator
// can handle it instead.
bool get _popEnabled {
// canPop will throw an error if called before build. Is this the best way
// to avoid that?
return _nestedNavigatorKey.currentState == null ? true : !_router.canPop();
}
void _onRouterChanged() {
// Here the _router reports the location correctly, but canPop is still out
// of date. Hence the post frame callback.
SchedulerBinding.instance.addPostFrameCallback((Duration duration) {
setState(() {});
});
}
@override
void initState() {
super.initState();
final BuildContext rootContext = context;
_router = GoRouter(
navigatorKey: _nestedNavigatorKey,
routes: [
GoRoute(
path: '/',
builder: (BuildContext context, GoRouterState state) => _LinksPage(
title: 'Nested once - home route',
backgroundColor: Colors.indigo,
onBack: () {
rootContext.pop();
},
buttons: <Widget>[
TextButton(
onPressed: () {
context.push('/two');
},
child: const Text('Go to another route in this nested Navigator'),
),
],
),
),
GoRoute(
path: '/two',
builder: (BuildContext context, GoRouterState state) => _LinksPage(
backgroundColor: Colors.indigo.withBlue(255),
title: 'Nested once - page two',
),
),
],
);
_router.addListener(_onRouterChanged);
}
@override
void dispose() {
_router.removeListener(_onRouterChanged);
super.dispose();
}
@override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return PopScope(
popEnabled: _popEnabled,
onPopped: (bool success) {
if (success) {
return;
}
_router.pop();
},
child: Router<Object>.withConfig(
restorationScopeId: 'router-2',
config: _router,
),
);
}
}
class _LinksPage extends StatelessWidget {
const _LinksPage ({
required this.backgroundColor,
this.buttons = const <Widget>[],
this.onBack,
required this.title,
});
final Color backgroundColor;
final List<Widget> buttons;
final VoidCallback? onBack;
final String title;
@override
Widget build(BuildContext context) {
return Scaffold(
backgroundColor: backgroundColor,
body: Center(
child: Column(
mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center,
children: <Widget>[
Text(title),
//const Text('A system back here will go back to Nested Navigators Page One'),
...buttons,
TextButton(
onPressed: onBack ?? () {
context.pop();
},
child: const Text('Go back'),
),
],
),
),
);
}
}
```
</details>
### Resources
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/109513
Depends on engine PR https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/39208✔️
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BGCWy1_LRrXEB6qeqTAKlk-U2CZlKJ5xI97g45U7azk/edit#
Migration guide: https://github.com/flutter/website/pull/8952
Fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/130738
A widget was added to explicitly and intentionally overlap the
PlatformView so that the rendering tree of Views would always have an
underlay and an overlay to match the test expectations.
Deprecate `textScaleFactor` in favor of `textScaler`, in preparation for Android 14 [Non-linear font scaling to 200%](https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/features#non-linear-font-scaling). The `TextScaler` class can be moved to `dart:ui` in the future, if we decide to use the Android platform API or AndroidX to get the scaling curve instead of hard coding the curve in the framework.
I haven't put the Flutter version in the deprecation message so the analyzer checks are failing. Will do so after I finish the migration guide.
**Why `TextScaler.textScaleFactor`**
The author of a `TextScaler` subclass should provide a fallback `textScaleFactor`. By making `TextScaler` also contain the `textScaleFactor` information it also makes it easier to migrate: if a widget overrides `MediaQueryData.textScaler` in the tree, for unmigrated widgets in the subtree it would also have to override `MediaQueryData.textScaleFactor`, and that makes it difficult to remove `MediaQueryData.textScaleFactor` in the future.
## A full list of affected APIs in this PR
Deprecated: The method/getter/setter/argument is annotated with a `@Deprecated()` annotation in this PR, and the caller should replace it with `textScaler` instead. Unless otherwise specified there will be a Flutter fix available to help with migration but it's still recommended to migrate case-by-case.
**Replaced**: The method this `textScaleFactor` argument belongs to is rarely called directly by user code and is not overridden by any of the registered custom tests, so the argument is directly replaced by `TextScaler`.
**To Be Deprecated**: The method/getter/setter/argument can't be deprecated in this PR because a registered customer test depends on it and a Flutter fix isn't available (or the test was run without applying flutter fixes first). This method/getter/setter/argument will be deprecated in a followup PR once the registered test is migrated.
### `Painting` Library
| Affected API | State of `textScaleFactor` | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `InlineSpan.build({ double textScaleFactor = 1.0 })` argument | **Replaced** | |
| `TextStyle.getParagraphStyle({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` argument | **Replaced** | |
| `TextStyle.getTextStyle({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` argument| Deprecated | Can't replace: c47fd38dca/super_editor/lib/src/infrastructure/super_textfield/desktop/desktop_textfield.dart (L1903-L1905)|
| `TextPainter({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | Deprecated | |
| `TextPainter.textScaleFactor` getter and setter | Deprecated | No Flutter Fix, not expressible yet |
| `TextPainter.computeWidth({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` argument | Deprecated | |
| `TextPainter.computeMaxIntrinsicWidth({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` argument | Deprecated | |
### `Rendering` Library
| Affected API | State of `textScaleFactor` | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `RenderEditable({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | Deprecated | |
| `RenderEditable.textScaleFactor` getter and setter | Deprecated | No Flutter Fix, not expressible yet |
| `RenderParagraph({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | Deprecated | |
| `RenderParagraph.textScaleFactor` getter and setter | Deprecated | No Flutter Fix, not expressible yet |
### `Widgets` Library
| Affected API | State of `textScaleFactor` | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `MediaQueryData({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | **To Be Deprecated** | cd7b93532e/packages/flutter_markdown/test/text_scale_factor_test.dart (LL39C21-L39C35) |
| `MediaQueryData.textScaleFactor` getter | Deprecated | |
| `MediaQueryData.copyWith({ double? TextScaleFactor })` argument | Deprecated | |
| `MediaQuery.maybeTextScaleFactorOf(BuildContext context)` static method | Deprecated | No Flutter Fix, not expressible yet |
| `MediaQuery.textScaleFactorOf(BuildContext context)` static method | **To Be Deprecated** | cd7b93532e/packages/flutter_markdown/lib/src/_functions_io.dart (L68-L70), No Flutter Fix, not expressible yet |
| `RichText({ double TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | **To Be Deprecated** | cd7b93532e/packages/flutter_markdown/lib/src/builder.dart (L829-L843) |
| `RichText.textScaleFactor` getter | **To Be Deprecated** | A constructor argument can't be deprecated right away|
| `Text({ double? TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | **To Be Deprecated** | 914d120da1/packages/rfw/lib/src/flutter/core_widgets.dart (L647) , No Flutter Fix because of https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52664 |
| `Text.rich({ double? TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | **To Be Deprecated** | The default constructor has an argument that can't be deprecated right away. No Flutter Fix because of https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52664 |
| `Text.textScaleFactor` getter | **To Be Deprecated** | A constructor argument can't be deprecated right away |
| `EditableText({ double? TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | Deprecated | No Flutter Fix because of https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52664 |
| `EditableText.textScaleFactor` getter | Deprecated | |
### `Material` Library
| Affected API | State of `textScaleFactor` | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `SelectableText({ double? TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | **To Be Deprecated** | cd7b93532e/packages/flutter_markdown/lib/src/builder.dart (L829-L843), No Flutter Fix because of https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52664 |
| `SelectableText.rich({ double? TextScaleFactor = 1.0 })` constructor argument | **To Be Deprecated** | The default constructor has an argument that can't be deprecated right away. No Flutter Fix because of https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/52664 |
| `SelectableText.textScaleFactor` getter | **To Be Deprecated** | A constructor argument can't be deprecated right away |
A lot of material widgets (`Slider`, `RangeSlider`, `TimePicker`, and different types of buttons) also change their layout based on `textScaleFactor`. These need to be handled in a case-by-case fashion and will be migrated in follow-up PRs.
This change enables Flutter to generate multiple Scenes to be rendered into separate FlutterViews from a single widget tree. Each Scene is described by a separate render tree, which are all associated with the single widget tree.
This PR implements the framework-side mechanisms to describe the content to be rendered into multiple views. Separate engine-side changes are necessary to provide these views to the framework and to draw the framework-generated Scene into them.
## Summary of changes
The details of this change are described in [flutter.dev/go/multiple-views](https://flutter.dev/go/multiple-views). Below is a high-level summary organized by layers.
### Rendering layer changes
* The `RendererBinding` no longer owns a single `renderView`. In fact, it doesn't OWN any `RenderView`s at all anymore. Instead, it offers an API (`addRenderView`/`removeRenderView`) to add and remove `RenderView`s that then will be MANAGED by the binding. The `RenderView` itself is now owned by a higher-level abstraction (e.g. the `RawView` Element of the widgets layer, see below), who is also in charge of adding it to the binding. When added, the binding will interact with the `RenderView` to produce a frame (e.g. by calling `compositeFrame` on it) and to perform hit tests for incoming pointer events. Multiple `RenderView`s can be added to the binding (typically one per `FlutterView`) to produce multiple Scenes.
* Instead of owning a single `pipelineOwner`, the `RendererBinding` now owns the root of the `PipelineOwner` tree (exposed as `rootPipelineOwner` on the binding). Each `PipelineOwner` in that tree (except for the root) typically manages its own render tree typically rooted in one of the `RenderView`s mentioned in the previous bullet. During frame production, the binding will instruct each `PipelineOwner` of that tree to flush layout, paint, semantics etc. A higher-level abstraction (e.g. the widgets layer, see below) is in charge of adding `PipelineOwner`s to this tree.
* Backwards compatibility: The old `renderView` and `pipelineOwner` properties of the `RendererBinding` are retained, but marked as deprecated. Care has been taken to keep their original behavior for the deprecation period, i.e. if you just call `runApp`, the render tree bootstrapped by this call is rooted in the deprecated `RendererBinding.renderView` and managed by the deprecated `RendererBinding.pipelineOwner`.
### Widgets layer changes
* The `WidgetsBinding` no longer attaches the widget tree to an existing render tree. Instead, it bootstraps a stand-alone widget tree that is not backed by a render tree. For this, `RenderObjectToWidgetAdapter` has been replaced by `RootWidget`.
* Multiple render trees can be bootstrapped and attached to the widget tree with the help of the `View` widget, which internally is backed by a `RawView` widget. Configured with a `FlutterView` to render into, the `RawView` creates a new `PipelineOwner` and a new `RenderView` for the new render tree. It adds the new `RenderView` to the `RendererBinding` and its `PipelineOwner` to the pipeline owner tree.
* The `View` widget can only appear in certain well-defined locations in the widget tree since it bootstraps a new render tree and does not insert a `RenderObject` into an ancestor. However, almost all Elements expect that their children insert `RenderObject`s, otherwise they will not function properly. To produce a good error message when the `View` widget is used in an illegal location, the `debugMustInsertRenderObjectIntoSlot` method has been added to Element, where a child can ask whether a given slot must insert a RenderObject into its ancestor or not. In practice, the `View` widget can be used as a child of the `RootWidget`, inside the `view` slot of the `ViewAnchor` (see below) and inside a `ViewCollection` (see below). In those locations, the `View` widget may be wrapped in other non-RenderObjectWidgets (e.g. InheritedWidgets).
* The new `ViewAnchor` can be used to create a side-view inside a parent `View`. The `child` of the `ViewAnchor` widget renders into the parent `View` as usual, but the `view` slot can take on another `View` widget, which has access to all inherited widgets above the `ViewAnchor`. Metaphorically speaking, the view is anchored to the location of the `ViewAnchor` in the widget tree.
* The new `ViewCollection` widget allows for multiple sibling views as it takes a list of `View`s as children. It can be used in all the places that accept a `View` widget.
## Google3
As of July 5, 2023 this change passed a TAP global presubmit (TGP) in google3: tap/OCL:544707016:BASE:545809771:1688597935864:e43dd651
## Note to reviewers
This change is big (sorry). I suggest focusing the initial review on the changes inside of `packages/flutter` first. The majority of the changes describe above are implemented in (listed in suggested review order):
* `rendering/binding.dart`
* `widgets/binding.dart`
* `widgets/view.dart`
* `widgets/framework.dart`
All other changes included in the PR are basically the fallout of what's implemented in those files. Also note that a lot of the lines added in this PR are documentation and tests.
I am also very happy to walk reviewers through the code in person or via video call, if that is helpful.
I appreciate any feedback.
## Feedback to address before submitting ("TODO")
Manual roll is needed because incoming dart sdk requires updated version
vm_snapshot_analysis (>=0.7.4).
5ae09b8b4f...7c83ea3e85
```
7c83ea3e85 Reland "Manual roll Dart SDK from 2d98d9e27dae to 0b07debd5862 (21 revisions) (#43457)" (#43472)
9ef3e8d533 Roll Skia from 5eba922297bb to 93c92f97f5ab (2 revisions) (#43471)
```
Remove implementation of SuitePlatform from the test as well. Remove use
of fake cwd from SuitePlatform as it can't be properly faked.
Some files are supposed to ignore, but don't.
- **/windows/flutter/generated_plugins.cmake
- **/linux/flutter/generated_plugin_registrant.cc
- **/linux/flutter/generated_plugin_registrant.h
- **/linux/flutter/generated_plugins.cmake
- **/windows/flutter/generated_plugin_registrant.cc
- **/windows/flutter/generated_plugin_registrant.h
- **/ios/Runner/GeneratedPluginRegistrant.h
- **/ios/Runner/GeneratedPluginRegistrant.m
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
Updated tests in dev, examples/api, and tests/widgets to ensure that
they continue to pass when the default for `ThemeData.useMaterial3` is
changed to true.
This is the final set of changes required for
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/127064.
- Bumps `vm_service` from `11.6.0` to `11.7.1`
- Bumps `web` from `0.1.3-beta` to `0.1.4-beta` and adds it everywhere.
- Moves `js` from `dependencies` to `dev_dependencies`
Unpins flutter_plugin_android_lifecycle where it is pinned. I then
1. ran `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade` (but only committed the changes within `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/`, which is where it had been pinned)
2. followed by `./gradlew :generateLockfiles` from `dev/integration_tests/gradle_deprecated_settings/android/` (the lockfile was what was causing the CI dependency resolution failure, so this second step is the fix for that).
See the reason it was pinned: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/121847#discussion_r1124797112 followed by the PR that pinned it: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/122043
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/122039
Fixes#124252, finishing work on the umbrella tracking issue, #126126.
Essentially, after this PR, no (non-test) code should be be referencing/invoking the java home or binary paths.
I think the flake is due to setclipboard or semantics update race condition. I migrated the test to use integration test package which relies less on timing
fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/124636
## Background
The Windows runner has a race at startup:
1. **Platform thread**: creates a hidden window
2. **Platform thread**: launches the Flutter engine
3. **UI/Raster threads**: renders the first frame
4. **Platform thread**: Registers a callback to show the window once the next frame has been rendered.
Steps 3 and 4 happen in parallel and it is possible for step 3 to complete before step 4 starts. In this scenario, the next frame callback is never called and the window is never shown.
As a result the `windows_startup_test`'s test, which [verifies that the "show window" callback is called](1f09a8662d/dev/integration_tests/windows_startup_test/windows/runner/flutter_window.cpp (L60-L64)), can flake if the first frame is rendered before the show window callback has been registered.
## Solution
This change makes the runner schedule a frame after it registers the next frame callback. If step 3 hasn't completed yet, this no-ops as a frame is already scheduled. If step 3 has already completed, a new frame will be rendered, which will call the next frame callback and show the window.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/119415
See this thread for alternatives that were considered: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/42061#issuecomment-1550080722
1. Add iOS and macOS migration to mark "last upgraded" Xcode version to 14.3 to prevent `Update to recommended settings` warning.
2. Update iOS and macOS templates to same.
3. Update iOS template to set `BuildIndependentTargetsInParallel` to YES as suggested. I didn't add a migration for this since it seems like a minor optimization and I don't think it's worth a potentially botched/corrupted migration.
4. Run all example/integration test project to see migrator work.
5. Add some missing test projects to the build shard since I noticed they were missing and I had to build those manually outside `SHARD=build_tests`.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/125817
See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/90304 for Xcode 13 example.
See https://docs.flutter.dev/reference/supported-platforms
I don't expect this to break anything, but if it does we can revert and figure out what else needs to happen first.
Without this change, engine changes upstream will get flagged in default flutter created apps.
Most of these imports were never appropriate. The `test_api` package was never intended for use in `_test.dart` files.
Where possible move imports to `matcher`, otherwise move them to `test` or `flutter_test`.
Leave uses of `test_api` from `flutter_test` library code.
- Update gradle and AGP version for abstract_method_smoke_test
#125138 part 1/N
To update successfully:
1. Update gradle to a version supported by jdk 17
2. Uncommented the lockfile lines in android/build.gradle
3. Then ran the AGP update assistant from AndroidStudio -> tools
4. From android ran `./gradlew dependencies --write-locks`
5. From android/app ran `./gradlew dependencies --write-locks`
6. Re enabled the lockfiles section of android/build.gradle
7. Ensured `flutter build apk` passed
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/123917
Doc covering a broad set of issues related to android studio updating.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hTXkjbUrBnXgu8NQsth1c3aEqo77rWoEj8CcsQ39wwQ/edit?pli=1#
Specifically this pr:
- Adds new functions to find a projects AGP, Gradle and java versions,
and tests.
- Adds new functions that take versions and parse if the versions are
compatible with each other, and tests.
- Adds validator for `flutter analyze --suggestions` that evaluates the
java/gradle/agp versions and checks if they are compatible, and
integration test.
- Updates the version of gradle used by
dev/integration_tests/flutter_gallery/ to the minimum supported by java
18 so that the integration tests pass (It is unknown why the java
version is 18.9 instead of 11)
- Moves `isWithinVersionRange` to version.dart, and tests.
- Adds FakeAndroidStudio to fakes to be used in multiple tests but does
not remove existing copies.
Metrics will be included as part of the definition of done for this bug
but not as part of this cl. It is already too big.
Known work still left in this pr:
* Understand why analyze integration tests are failing.
Example output if Java and gradle are not compatible:
```
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ General Info │
│ [✓] App Name: espresso_example │
│ [✓] Supported Platforms: android │
│ [✓] Is Flutter Package: yes │
│ [✓] Uses Material Design: yes │
│ [✓] Is Plugin: no │
│ [✗] Java/Gradle/Android Gradle Plugin: │
│ │
│ Incompatible Java/Gradle versions. │
│ │
│ Java Version: 17.0.6, Gradle Version: 7.0.2 │
│ │
│ See the link below for more information. │
│ https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#java │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
Example output if Gradle and AGP are not compatible
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ General Info │
│ [✓] App Name: espresso_example │
│ [✓] Supported Platforms: android │
│ [✓] Is Flutter Package: yes │
│ [✓] Uses Material Design: yes │
│ [✓] Is Plugin: no │
│ [✗] Java/Gradle/Android Gradle Plugin: Incompatible Gradle/AGP versions. │
│ │
│ Gradle Version: 7.0.2, AGP Version: 7.4.2 │
│ │
│ Update gradle to at least "7.5". │
│ See the link below for more information: │
│ https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/gradle-plugin#updating-gradle │
│ │
│ Incompatible Java/Gradle versions. │
│ │
│ Java Version: 17.0.6, Gradle Version: 7.0.2 │
│ │
│ See the link below for more information: │
│ https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#java │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
Example output if Java/Gradle/Agp are not compatible.
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ General Info │
│ [✓] App Name: espresso_example │
│ [✓] Supported Platforms: android │
│ [✓] Is Flutter Package: yes │
│ [✓] Uses Material Design: yes │
│ [✓] Is Plugin: no │
│ [✗] Java/Gradle/Android Gradle Plugin: Incompatible Gradle/AGP versions. │
│ │
│ Gradle Version: 7.0.2, AGP Version: 7.4.2 │
│ │
│ Update gradle to at least "7.5". │
│ See the link below for more information: │
│ https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/gradle-plugin#updating-gradle │
│ │
│ Incompatible Java/Gradle versions. │
│ │
│ Java Version: 17.0.6, Gradle Version: 7.0.2 │
│ │
│ See the link below for more information: │
│ https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#java │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
Commit messages
- Add function to gradle_utils.dart that gets the gradle version from
wrapper or system and add a test for each situation
- Add method to get agp version, add method to validate agp against
gradle version, update documentation, add tests for agp validation.
- Update dart doc for validateGradleAndAgp to describe where the info
came from and corner case behavior, create function to validate java and
gradle and hardcode return to false
- Fill out and test java gradle compatibility function in gradle_utils
- Hook up java gradle evaluateion to hasValidJavaGradleAgpVersions with
hardcoded java version
- Add java --version output parsing and tests
- Add getJavaBinary test
- Update comment in android_sdk for mac behavior with java_home -v
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
