<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#165261
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: jonahwilliams
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: bork the tree
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: jonahwilliams
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {gaaclarke}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
The cost of bootstapping the initial PSOs can regress cold startup time
for customer money. As an experiment, attempt to defer PSO construction
to skia like.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Clarke <aaclarke@google.com>
Co-authored-by: gaaclarke <30870216+gaaclarke@users.noreply.github.com>
Update the comment in .ci.yaml with the issue link for easier discovery.
Related issue: #156506
Related discussion: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162000
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This reverts commit 2a6b0158b2.
Revert "Skip Xcode install on mac_mokey Android tests (#163685)"
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/164408
Ready for review
~I think this pr is blocked by
https://github.com/flutter/cocoon/pull/4275 uploading a new artifact.~
then someone with cipd-writers access running `cipd set-ref
flutter/ktlint/linux-amd64 -ref version_1_5_0 -version <TBD ID>`
where id comes from
https://chrome-infra-packages.appspot.com/p/flutter/ktlint/linux-amd64
To check if I had writer permissions I ran `cipd acl-check
flutter/android/sdk/all/ -writer`
To request permissions use go/flutter-cipd-write (googler only)
Successful run of linux analyze
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/try/Linux%20analyze/96415/overview
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
The .ci.yaml on a release branch may be missing builders that are active
on the latest master version of .ci.yaml. If a configuration based on
the release branch is pushed to LUCI, then CI will fail to schedule
those builders when run for a master branch PR.
S24 is only hooked up in the try pool at the moment, so this will fail
in the staging pool after landing, following which we can run the test
in a second PR in presubmit by changing `presubmit` to `true`.
For https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162639
fixes#162615
Evidance of passing.
https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/#/build?taskFilter=cut&showBringup=true&repo=flutter&branch=master&showMac=false&showWindows=false&showiOS=false&showLinux=false
One failure is an unrelated tooling failure #163311
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This benchmark is a benchmark of the integration test binding which IMO
is not that important given that we continue to rely on flutter_driver
for actual performance metrics.
b/371020223
linux_android_emu and linux_android_emu_34 ran 2 different sets of
dependencies because the adoption of 35 was unstable. The reasons why
wound up being incompatible/bad versions of the build tool dependencies
like the graphics engine chosen was unstable on 35. This was fixed with
dependency changes.
Introduce an unstable linux android emulator configuration that can be
used to prove a dependency set as stable.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Windows is taking just longer than 30 minutes to finish this task. 45
minutes will keep us informed if it gets much longer without causing
lots of CI flakes. Mac and Linux versions of these tasks are finishing
well under 30 minutes so their timeouts are being left at the default.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162615
Can test 2 different ways.
On a mac (or linux machine) with adb on the path (or android sdk set in
ANDROID_HOME) and an emulator running (or physical device attached) that
is api 30 or higher.
```
cd dev/devicelab
dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t android_display_cutout
```
OR
```
dev/integration_tests/display_cutout_rotation
flutter drive integration_test/display_cutout_test.dart
```
Proof the test ran successfully
```
[2025-02-12 08:08:22.069817] [STDOUT] Removing Synthetic notch...
[2025-02-12 08:08:22.071147] [STDOUT] Executing "/b/s/w/ir/cache/android/sdk/platform-tools/adb -s emulator-5554 shell cmd overlay disable com.android.internal.display.cutout.emulation.tall" in "/b/s/w/ir/x/w/rc/tmpk3k3yhhp/flutter sdk/dev/integration_tests/display_cutout_rotation/" with environment {BOT: true, LANG: en_US.UTF-8}
[2025-02-12 08:08:22.862219] [STDOUT] Checking for reboot
[android_defines_test] Process terminated with exit code 0.
Task result:
{
"success": true,
"data": null,
"detailFiles": [],
"benchmarkScoreKeys": [],
"reason": "success"
}
```
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8723125792202374961/+/u/run_android_defines_test/stdout
All checks passed
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/162641/checks?check_run_id=36991537539
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- meta-tags: To be used by the automation script only, DO NOT MODIFY.
{
"name": "Mac_benchmark basic_material_app_macos__compile"
}
-->
Issue link: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162364
Co-authored-by: Chris Bracken <chris@bracken.jp>
This also wires up the preview detector to trigger hot reloads when new
previews are detected or previews are removed.
Note: while this change results in lib/generated_preview.dart being
generated and updated, it's not currently referenced by lib/main.dart
and the preview environment will render a black screen.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Kolos <andrewrkolos@gmail.com>
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162714
The "run test.dart for web_tool_tests" step is now taking longer than 30
minutes due to an increase in the number of tests.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [X] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [X] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [X] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [X] I signed the [CLA].
- [X] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [X] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [X] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
This target was using `release_build: true` as a way to skip release
branches. This flag is used to signal engine artifacts are built - they
need to be skipped:
- in release branches because artifacts are produced through other
paths.
- in postsubmits of monorepo since the engine artifacts are produced in
the merge queue.
This target was the only one in the framework defining it this way. It
should have been using `enabled_branches`.
tested: locally, using CiYaml directly with a copy of flutter's ci.yaml:
```dart
final YamlMap configYaml = loadYaml(await File(args.command!['file']).readAsString()) as YamlMap;
final pb.SchedulerConfig schedulerConfig = pb.SchedulerConfig()..mergeFromProto3Json(configYaml);
final masterYaml = CiYamlSet(
yamls: {
CiType.any: schedulerConfig,
},
slug: RepositorySlug.full('flutter/flutter'),
branch: 'master',
validate: false,
isFusion: false,
);
final masterNames = {...masterYaml.postsubmitTargets().map((t) => t.value.name)};
final releaseYaml = CiYamlSet(
yamls: {
CiType.any: schedulerConfig,
},
slug: RepositorySlug.full('flutter/flutter'),
branch: 'flutter-3.27-candidate.0',
validate: false,
isFusion: false,
);
final releaseNames = {...releaseYaml.postsubmitTargets().map((t) => t.value.name)};
print("********************************");
print(releaseNames.contains('Linux docs_publish')); // false
print(masterNames.contains('Linux docs_publish')); // true - generate docs in postsubmit
print("********************************");
```
Fixes#162552
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#162335
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Not feasible to implement this as-is, so it just
makes the configuration file confusing. Revert for now.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: matanlurey
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {jonahwilliams}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162329.
This currently does nothing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
A few changes in this PR (could have been split up, but that would take
an extra 4 hours - 2 days in CI time):
- Removed the old `flutter_driver_android_test` shards and references
- Override `AndroidManifest.xml` per backend, forcing that backend to be
used (no fallbacks) or it fails
- Bumps the Android emulator to 35 due to the use of magic strings, I
think
The check for the Impeller backend actually being used is the honor
system right now, as a bug in `flutter drive`
(https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162087) prevents me from
seeing error output, meaning that it's impossible to be sure a
particular Impeller backend is used (or understand why a crash happens),
so I guess I'll work on that next.
Due to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/162088, we were
accidentally running our Vulkan tests as OpenGLES 🤦🏼 .
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161333.
This adds the initial `.ci.yaml` configuration (marked `bringup: true`),
without changing the existing shard to avoid the problems we ran into
last time when I renamed the shard atomically, as well as piping for
providing context in which the test will run (Vulkan or OpenGLES), which
can't be introspected in the _running_ app.
In a follow-up PR I'll:
- Edit `AndroidManifest.xml` before the suite, setting `ImpellerBackend`
appropriately
- Move the bringup nodes to presubmit
- Delete the existing (legacy) node
The goal here is to have a great standalone `android_engine_test` suite
that [replaces
`scenario_app/android`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/160992).
No test is _functionally_ changed in this PR, but overview of changes:
- Finished renaming the suite `android_engine_tests` instead of
`flutter_driver_android`
- Added instructions and an environment variable for local generation of
golden-files (`UPDATE_GOLDENS=1`)
- Added explanations of the individual tests, where they live, and how
to run them locally
- Added a hybrid-composition (HC, not TLHC, which is already tested)
test
- Renamed "other_smiley" to "surface_texture_smiley" (and renamed the
original to "surface_producer_smiley")
- Removed unnecessary ".android" suffix (we will not run this on
anything but Android)
- Added a `tool/deflake.dart` to run a test suite 10x (or custom) times
locally to try and determine flakiness
After this PR, I'll add flags to let you control variants and name the
screenshots accordingly, i.e.:
- API v34 or v35
- OpenGLES or Vulkan (will require an `AndroidManifest.xml` edit during
the test instrumentation)
The arm64 Macs should have more memory than the Linux machines that are
available in the devicelab. The analyzer benchmark spawns a Dart
analysis server process that has a peak memory consumption of around
7GB, which may be activating the OOM killer on the Linux bots.
See https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161306
Random seed 349875783 is failing half the time.
```
flutter run -v -d IR65S859OJ4HAY6P --profile lib/benchmark_collection.dart --dart-define=seed=349875783
```
I'm concerned that this sometimes passes, which points to some hidden
timing bugs.
<!-- meta-tags: To be used by the automation script only, DO NOT MODIFY.
{
"name": "Mac_benchmark flutter_gallery_macos__compile"
}
-->
Issue link: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160495
Co-authored-by: Chris Bracken <chris@bracken.jp>
This auto-formats all *.dart files in the repository outside of the
`engine` subdirectory and enforces that these files stay formatted with
a presubmit check.
**Reviewers:** Please carefully review all the commits except for the
one titled "formatted". The "formatted" commit was auto-generated by
running `dev/tools/format.sh -a -f`. The other commits were hand-crafted
to prepare the repo for the formatting change. I recommend reviewing the
commits one-by-one via the "Commits" tab and avoiding Github's "Files
changed" tab as it will likely slow down your browser because of the
size of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kate Lovett <katelovett@google.com>
Co-authored-by: LongCatIsLooong <31859944+LongCatIsLooong@users.noreply.github.com>
I fixed the autoroller in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/160059
but forgot to mark the shard non-bring-up. Note, it's currently failing
in post-submit, but only because bringUp shards run in the staging pool,
which does not have access to the GitHub access token necessary for the
roller to operate.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#159756
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gmackall
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Made the tree red due to some std out.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gmackall
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
<!-- meta-tags: To be used by the automation script only, DO NOT MODIFY.
{
"name": "Mac_benchmark flutter_view_macos__start_up"
}
-->
Issue link: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/159540
Co-authored-by: Chris Bracken <chris@bracken.jp>
<!-- meta-tags: To be used by the automation script only, DO NOT MODIFY.
{
"name": "Mac_benchmark hello_world_macos__compile"
}
-->
Issue link: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/159542
Co-authored-by: Chris Bracken <chris@bracken.jp>
Update to the latest definitions of emulator configurations.
Specifically to past https://crrev.com/c/5908894 which added `gpu_mode:
"swangle_indirect"` to the api 35 proto. This should help with emulator
stability on versions past android 13.
Related to b/371020223
Related: https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/56313
Research notes / my findings for how this system works at
go/flutter-android-ci-emulator
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide] and the [C++,
Objective-C, Java style guides].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am
adding, or the PR is [test-exempt]. See [testing the engine] for
instructions on writing and running engine tests.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- meta-tags: To be used by the automation script only, DO NOT MODIFY.
{
"name": "Mac_x64 hot_mode_dev_cycle_macos_target__benchmark"
}
-->
Issue link: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/158568
It would be nice to have somewhere to iterate and experiment with what we can do to either fix frequent timeout problems we have with `flutter build apk` (across platforms, to be clear, though I've just started with Linux) or get more information on why the crashes/timeouts happen.
Open to other ways to doing this (though preferably _not_ LED).
Reverts: flutter/flutter#158242
Initiated by: LouiseHsu
Reason for reverting: Flake rate is low, and the arm64 macs in the staging pools are having difficulties
Original PR Author: fluttergithubbot
Reviewed By: {LouiseHsu}
This change reverts the following previous change:
<!-- meta-tags: To be used by the automation script only, DO NOT MODIFY.
{
"name": "Mac_arm64_ios hot_mode_dev_cycle_ios__benchmark"
}
-->
Issue link: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/158241
