Reverts: flutter/flutter#150969
Initiated by: goderbauer
Reason for reverting: Failing test in https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8743574743030691569/+/u/run_android_obfuscate_test/stdout
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
After the land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53592, there is some log spam:
```
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/c1e137371ec1afe9bc9bd7b05823752d/transformed/fragment-1.7.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/fragment_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
e: /Users/mackall/.gradle/caches/transforms-3/d86c7cb1c556fe1655fa56db671c649c/transformed/jetified-activity-1.8.1/jars/classes.jar!/META-INF/activity_release.kotlin_module: Module was compiled with an incompatible version of Kotlin. The binary version of its metadata is 1.8.0, expected version is 1.6.0.
...
```
I think this is harmless, but still annoying. Upgrading the AGP version fixes it. To be honest, I don't know why (I expected the Kotlin version would do it). But after https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, our tests have been running on AGP/Gradle 8.1/8.3 for a while, so it makes sense to upgrade anyways.
In a follow up PR:
1. Also upgrade the tests that were left behind in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/146307, as I think removal of discontinued plugins paved the way here.
The Gradle Kotlin DSL also allows for type-safe application of the Flutter Gradle plugin, which is currently undetected by the CLI
```kotlin
plugins {
dev.flutter.`flutter-gradle-plugin`
}
```
Please note that the added test case isn't ideal, since the example gradle isn't actually valid kotlin DSL, however the `kotlin host app language with Gradle Kotlin DSL` is identical
Fixes#149859
If the user specifies the `--no-web-resources-cdn` or `--local-web-sdk`, we should use the local version of CanvasKit. `flutter.js` now has a flag that can be specified in the build configuration that tells it to load locally instead.
Also, added a link to the relevant docs in the web template warnings.
This addresses https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148713
Also fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145559
Work towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/132712.
After this PR, after a completed `flutter build apk` command, we:
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-disabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is `'false'`.
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-disabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is _missing_.
- Emit a `manifest-impeller-enabled` command if `io.flutter.embedding.android.EnableImpeller` is `'true'`.
We will need to change the default (see `_impellerEnabledByDefault` in `project.dart`) before releasing, otherwise we will misreport `manifest-impeller-disabled` at a much higher rate than actual. If there is a way to instead compute the default instead of hard-coding, that would have been good.
See <https://docs.flutter.dev/perf/impeller#android> for details on the key-value pair.
---
I also did a tad of TLC, by removing the (now-defunct) `Usage` events for `flutter build ios`, so they are consistent.
/cc @zanderso, @chinmaygarde, @jonahwilliams
The previous approach of killing the Chromium parent process sometimes caused leaks of child processes on Windows. The Browser.close command in the debug protocol will tell Chromium to shut down all of its processes.
Two issues I noticed when I hit the issue at https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149258
1. When the an app.stop event arrives from Flutter with an error, DAP does not pass that error back to the client so there's no visibility of the error.
2. If app.stop occurs but no app.start ever did, we leave the progress notification hanging around
This fixes both by handling app.stop and closing any open launch progress as well as passing any error to the client.
Fixes https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5124
Even though this does not fix the below issue lets land this anyway as not logging to stderr when clearing logs makes sense to me.
related https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150093
The test added is bad. It does not verify the behavior changed.
To verify the behavior changed correctly I would need to modify the generic device class to have clearLogs be an async function like many of the other calls. That would mean modifying every other device type and their implementations and their tests. Then I would need to update android_device to expose its logger. That is more than I have time for to validate a 2% flake error.
Feel free to disagree in the comments on this pr.
PR to pave the way for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53001 to re-land
Summary:
- Enforces use of Kotlin >= `1.7.0` (please see below note)
- Fixes ci failures that prevented the above PR from landing.
Details:
Because it landed initially, we are able to fake the roll in this PR to fix all the tests ([see my comment](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/149204#discussion_r1617924772)).
Fixes all the tests that failed:
1. `module_test` failing on multiple platforms (3/9 of the failures).
Failure is
```
> Android resource linking failed
ERROR:/b/s/w/ir/x/t/flutter_module_test.KECMXW/hello/.android/plugins_build_output/device_info/intermediates/merged_res/release/values/values.xml:194: AAPT: error: resource android:attr/lStar not found.
```
This is a rather unhelpful error message but some [folks online suggest](https://stackoverflow.com/a/69050529) that upgrading your `compileSdk` version fixes this.
These resolve when I remove the dependency on the long discontinued [package_info](https://pub.dev/packages/package_info) and [device_info](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info) packages, perhaps because they are transitively pulling in low `compileSdk` versions? This is unclear to me.
2. `module_custom_host_app_name_test` was failing for the same reason (another 3/9, or cumulative 6/9).
3. `tool_integration_tests_3_4` was a flake ð (7/9)
4. `framework_tests_slow` needed a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin (the flutter tool tells us this, so I just upgraded as suggested) and it resolved (8/9)
5.`android_preview_tool_integration_tests` needed newer AGP and KGP versions. I also refactored the tests, and bumped our error versions, fixing https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/142653.
**Note that the bump to KGP is not in line with our policy** - we didn't warn for `1.5.0-1.6.x` for a release (or at all) before dropping support. But I think it might still be justified:
- The bump to our androidx libraries unblocks ongoing Scribe work, and also includes a fix for a [memory leak](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129307#issuecomment-1601636959) and a [crash on folding phones](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/114868#issuecomment-2133226962), among many other bug fixes.
- Gradle [doesn't test on half of that range](https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html#kotlin), and so we implicitly can't claim to support it either. More generally, our Java and Kotlin support ranges should probably strictly fall within what Gradle tests.
This adds the 'fail-fast' argument to flutter test, since dart test already supports this feature. Tests can now be stopped after first failure.
Fixes#124406
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/145158.
In an ideal world, the `--machine` flag would be strictly a global flag which sub-commands can choose to use (or perhaps just to report a `toolExit` that they don't have a `--machine` supported-mode if not. However currently, there is both a global flag, and command-specific flags.
This leads to the confusing scenario where:
```sh
flutter devices --machine
```
... still checks for a Flutter update, printing a banner and breaking the JSON output.
This PR "fixes" that by allowing `--machine` _anywhere_ in the command-line arguments to suppress the check.
/cc @johnmccutchan.
Currently, the error message displayed to regenerate the lockfiles gives a Unix-like command ./gradlew, which will be incorrect for Windows environments. This PR uses globals.platform.isWindows to give the appropriate command.
closes#136763
- When `--web-renderer` is omitted, keep the value `null` until it later materializes to either `canvaskit` or `skwasm`.
- No more hardcoded defaults anywhere. We use `WebRendererMode.defaultForJs/defaultForWasm` instead.
- When in `--wasm` mode, the JS fallback is now `canvaskit` instead of `auto`.
- Add test for defaulting to `skwasm` when `--wasm` is enabled.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149826
If the service is disposed when we make calls on it, we need to bubble up an exception that is understood by the callers.
This is another speculative fix for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149238.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/149386. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106150.
The stocks test app includes Dart files containing localized messages generated by `package:flutter_localizations`. However, these files appear to have become out of date. Running `pub get` in the project will regenerate these files and generate a diff, which can be annoying when working on the repo.
This PR generates the files. ~~It also updates the templates for these files to be compliant with flutter/flutter repo lint rules, including `noop_primitive_operations` and `use_super_parameters`.~~ It also adds `// ignore_for_file: type=lint` to these files to disable linting for these files. This avoids issues like https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/106150 and [this](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148741#issuecomment-2141161753).
Dart2wasm only needs a platform file, which contains the compiled
`dart:*` libraries. There's no need to specify a seperate `--dart-sdk`
option (anymore).
(See also https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/366821)
This PR modifies the `flutter create --empty` command to not delete the `test/` folder when run on an existing app project.
Before:
```bash
flutter create my_app --empty
mkdir my_app/test
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
flutter create my_app --empty
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test does not exist
```
After:
```bash
flutter create my_app --empty
mkdir my_app/test
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
flutter create my_app --empty
if test -d my_app/test; then echo "test exists"; else echo "test does not exist"; fi # test exists
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/134928
This PR adds support invoking `link.dart` hooks.
Link hooks can add new assets. Link hooks can transform assets sent to link hook from build hooks.
This PR does not yet add support for getting tree-shake information in the link hooks. This is pending on defining the `resources.json` format (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/55494).
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146263
## Implementation considerations
The build hooks could be run before Dart compilation and the link hooks after Dart compilation. (This is how it's done in Dart standalone.) However, due to the way the `Target`s are set up, this would require two targets and serializing and deserializing the `BuildResult` in between these. This would lead to more code but no benefits. Currently there is nothing that mandates running build hooks before Dart compilation.
## Testing
* The unit tests verify that the native_assets_builder `link` and `linkDryRun` would be invoked with help of the existing fake.
* The native assets integration test now also invokes an FFI call of a package that adds the asset during the link hook instead of the build hook.
* In order to keep coverage of the `flutter create --template=package_ffi`, `flutter create` is still run and the extra dependency is added and an extra ffi call is added. (Open to alternative suggestions.)
This PR adds a new flag `default-flavor` in the `flutter` section of `pubspec.yaml`. It allows developers of multi-flavor android apps to specify a default flavor to be used for `flutter run`, `flutter build` etc.
Using `flutter run` on flavored apps already works without specifying `--flavor` already works on iOS (it defaults to the `runner` schema), so I (and others in #22856) figured this would be nice to have.
fixes#22856
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148354
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/147142
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/147144
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
`'flutter create should tool exit if the template manifest cannot be read'` fails consistently, as shown by #148614.
The test expects a `ToolExit` with the message "Unable to read the template manifest", but depending on how the test is being run, a different exception ("Cannot create a project within the Flutter SDK") is sometimes thrown first.
This pull request relocates the test project to `dev/` to prevent the extraneous error.
Adds an empty privacy manifest, and commented out code to include it in the build, to the plugin template. This will make it much easier to explain how to add a privacy manifest in plugin docs, since instead of explaining the format of the file from scratch and providing example code to inculde it, we can just instruct people to add entries to an exisitng file and then uncomment a line or two. This will also make it much easier to figure out from the template output itself how to add support for people who don't find the documentation.
Part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/131940
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140013
