Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161333.
This adds the initial `.ci.yaml` configuration (marked `bringup: true`),
without changing the existing shard to avoid the problems we ran into
last time when I renamed the shard atomically, as well as piping for
providing context in which the test will run (Vulkan or OpenGLES), which
can't be introspected in the _running_ app.
In a follow-up PR I'll:
- Edit `AndroidManifest.xml` before the suite, setting `ImpellerBackend`
appropriately
- Move the bringup nodes to presubmit
- Delete the existing (legacy) node
The goal here is to have a great standalone `android_engine_test` suite
that [replaces
`scenario_app/android`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/160992).
No test is _functionally_ changed in this PR, but overview of changes:
- Finished renaming the suite `android_engine_tests` instead of
`flutter_driver_android`
- Added instructions and an environment variable for local generation of
golden-files (`UPDATE_GOLDENS=1`)
- Added explanations of the individual tests, where they live, and how
to run them locally
- Added a hybrid-composition (HC, not TLHC, which is already tested)
test
- Renamed "other_smiley" to "surface_texture_smiley" (and renamed the
original to "surface_producer_smiley")
- Removed unnecessary ".android" suffix (we will not run this on
anything but Android)
- Added a `tool/deflake.dart` to run a test suite 10x (or custom) times
locally to try and determine flakiness
After this PR, I'll add flags to let you control variants and name the
screenshots accordingly, i.e.:
- API v34 or v35
- OpenGLES or Vulkan (will require an `AndroidManifest.xml` edit during
the test instrumentation)
Towards https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/161261 (before I add
more tests).
This is a 1:1 move, with massaging of
`run_flutter_driver_android_tests.dart` to be more automated as tests
are added.
/cc @reidbaker
imperative apply has been deprecated since #139690
part of #121541
Doing this will make things easier for us during the conversion of
`flutter.groovy` into Kotlin.
This PR rolls in a number of breaking changes from dart-lang/native:
* `BuildMode` is no longer part of the protocol, so Flutter no longer
passes it in.
* This means all code dealing with the name conflict between
`native_assets_cli.BuildMode` and `flutter_tools.BuildMode` has been
cleaned up.
* Also, the logs no longer mention the build mode.
* The tests still exercise both modes, because linking only happens in
release mode.
* `OS` is no longer part of the main protocol, but of the "code"
"protocol extension".
* The code now aligns more with `OS?` being nullable in a bunch of
places, since it is nullable if there's no code assets.
* The OS-specific config is nested in an object per OS.
* `CCompilerConfig`s fields are non-nullable now.
* So instead of passing an object with nullable fields around, a null
instead of the object is returned in various places.
* `FileSystem` is now passed in to the native assets builder.
This PR contains no feature changes.
This PR will need to be followed up by restricting what environment
variables are passed in (similar to
https://github.com/dart-lang/native/pull/1764), I will do this in a
follow up PR.
Tests:
* All existing features should be covered by existing tests.
In the future a hook may be invoked multiple times with different
`supportedAssetTypes` (soon to be renamed to `buildAssetTypes`).
The hook should only emit those asset types that are in
`supportedAssetTypes` - anything else is an error. Right now flutter
happens to invoke hooks only with `Code` asset types, but more asset
types are coming, for which this PR is a preparation for.
This auto-formats all *.dart files in the repository outside of the
`engine` subdirectory and enforces that these files stay formatted with
a presubmit check.
**Reviewers:** Please carefully review all the commits except for the
one titled "formatted". The "formatted" commit was auto-generated by
running `dev/tools/format.sh -a -f`. The other commits were hand-crafted
to prepare the repo for the formatting change. I recommend reviewing the
commits one-by-one via the "Commits" tab and avoiding Github's "Files
changed" tab as it will likely slow down your browser because of the
size of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kate Lovett <katelovett@google.com>
Co-authored-by: LongCatIsLooong <31859944+LongCatIsLooong@users.noreply.github.com>
First part of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160379.
This should be a NOP, because without the
`explicit-package-dependencies` feature flag, all dependencies
(including dev_dependencies) are considered, for the purposes of
plugins, non-dev dependencies.
This change prepares for flipping that flag, so when the flip occurs, it
is _also_ a NOP for these tests.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#159756
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gmackall
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Made the tree red due to some std out.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gmackall
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
Almost all of the code is just adopting to changes to the APIs of
`package:native_assets_builder`, `package:native_assets_cli` and
`package:native_toolchain_c`
There's only two semantic changes
* Removes a test that checks for a verification error if a build hook
produces a static library if the preferred linking mode is dynamic:
=> The test is written in a very hacky way. By monkey patching the build
config.json that flutter build actually made. This monkey patching
relies on package:cli_config which is now no longer used.
=> The actual code that checks for this mismatch lives in
dart-lang/native repository and is tested there. So there's really no
need to duplicate that.
* The `package:native_assets_builder` no longer knows about code assets.
This is something a user of that package (e.g. flutter tools) adds. Now
the dry-run functionality will invoke build hooks who produce code
assets without an architecture.
=> The `package:native_assets_builder` used to expand such a code asset
to N different code assets (one for each supported architecture)
=> This logic was now moved to flutter tools. => In the near future
we're going to this dry-run complexity, which will then also get rid of
this uglyness (of expanding to all archs of an OS).
We added `use_modular_headers!` to our `Podfile`s as we originally planned to phase out `use_frameworks!` (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/42204). However, our plans have now changed and we are instead phasing out CocoaPods entirely in favor of Swift Package Manager.
CocoaPods's `use_frameworks!` and `use_modular_headers!` are two different overlapping options that should not be used together. This change removes the `use_modular_headers!` from the macOS `Podfile` and the iOS Swift `Podfile` (the iOS Objective-C template was recently deprecated https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/155867).
This change only affects _new_ Flutter apps. This change does not include an automatic migration as that could break existing apps. Instead, users are encouraged to migrate from CocoaPods to Swift Package Manager.
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/156259
Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
This is simply removing unnecessary parenthesis from various places. This change is because of a change to the unnecessary_parentesis lint that will trigger there. Here is the CL https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/390161.
- https://github.com/dart-lang/linter/issues/4996
If anything else is needed please let me know.
I'd like to ask for this PR to wait a bit until the bots are run again on that CL so that I can be sure nothing else will trigger, I will come back here and update this whenever everything is complete. Thanks!
Allows applying of `include_flutter.groovy` via the `apply from:` syntax, which allows using a host app that is using the Gradle Kotlin DSL (the default these days when creating an Android app in AS).
Explanation: The `include_flutter.groovy` script is currently not able to be called by Kotlin gradle files, because it is [intended to be invoked with the following lines](https://docs.flutter.dev/add-to-app/android/project-setup#depend-on-the-modules-source-code):
```
setBinding(new Binding([gradle: this])) // new
evaluate(new File( // new
settingsDir.parentFile, // new
'flutter_module/.android/include_flutter.groovy' // new
))
```
`setBinding` isn't part of the Kotlin gradle DSL, and there isn't (that I can find) an easy Kotlin equivalent. If this binding isn't set, the reference to `gradle` in `include_flutter.groovy` is wrong, which breaks the script.
This PR modifies `include_flutter.groovy` to also support being invoked through the standard way of invoking a script via the Gradle Groovy/Kotlin DSLs, which is `apply from:` (or it's slightly different Kotlin syntax). The start of the script identifies which of the two approaches is being used by checking if the binding is set, and then initializes some variables differently depending on the case.
If we land this, I believe we should update the example Gradle files for both the `kts` and `groovy` cases to prefer the `apply from` syntax as I think this is the syntax most developers would be more familiar with already seeing in their Gradle files.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#156440
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Failing in post submit with
```
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743647] [STDOUT] stdout: [!] CocoaPods could not find compatible versions for pod "Google-Mobile-Ads-SDK":
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743695] [STDOUT] stdout: In Podfile:
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743718] [STDOUT] stdout: google_mobile_ads (from `.symlinks/plugins/google_mobile_ads/ios`) was resolved t
Original PR Author: flutter-pub-roller-bot
Reviewed By: {fluttergithubbot}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`.
This pull request aims to improve code readability, based on feedback gathered in a recent design doc.
<br>
There are two factors that hugely impact how easy it is to understand a piece of code: **verbosity** and **complexity**.
Reducing **verbosity** is important, because boilerplate makes a project more difficult to navigate. It also has a tendency to make one's eyes gloss over, and subtle typos/bugs become more likely to slip through.
Reducing **complexity** makes the code more accessible to more people. This is especially important for open-source projects like Flutter, where the code is read by those who make contributions, as well as others who read through source code as they debug their own projects.
<hr>
<br>
The following examples show how pattern-matching might affect these two factors:
<details> <summary><h3>Example 1 (GOOD)</h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (ancestor case InheritedElement(:final InheritedTheme widget)) {
themes.add(widget);
}
```
Without using patterns, this might expand to
```dart
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget widget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(widget);
}
}
```
Had `ancestor` been a non-local variable, it would need to be "converted" as well:
```dart
final Element ancestor = this.ancestor;
if (ancestor is InheritedElement) {
final InheritedWidget inheritedWidget = ancestor.widget;
if (widget is InheritedTheme) {
themes.add(theme);
}
}
```
</details>
<details> <summary><h3>Example 2 (BAD) </h3> [click to expand]</summary>
```dart
if (widget case PreferredSizeWidget(preferredSize: Size(:final double height))) {
return height;
}
```
Assuming `widget` is a non-local variable, this would expand to:
```dart
final Widget widget = this.widget;
if (widget is PreferredSizeWidget) {
return widget.preferredSize.height;
}
```
<br>
</details>
In both of the examples above, an `if-case` statement simultaneously verifies that an object meets the specified criteria and performs a variable assignment accordingly.
But there are some differences: Example 2 uses a more deeply-nested pattern than Example 1 but makes fewer useful checks.
**Example 1:**
- checks that `ancestor` is an `InheritedElement`
- checks that the inherited element's `widget` is an `InheritedTheme`
**Example 2:**
- checks that `widget` is a `PreferredSizeWidget`
(every `PreferredSizeWidget` has a `size` field, and every `Size` has a `height` field)
<br>
<hr>
I feel hesitant to try presenting a set of cut-and-dry rules as to which scenarios should/shouldn't use pattern-matching, since there are an abundance of different types of patterns, and an abundance of different places where they might be used.
But hopefully the conversations we've had recently will help us converge toward a common intuition of how pattern-matching can best be utilized for improved readability.
<br><br>
- resolves https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152313
- Design Doc: [flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns](https://flutter.dev/go/dart-patterns)
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
Rolls native deps to the latest version, and cleans up deprecated field from template.
Tests:
* All the unit and integration tests for native assets. The template and dependencies are exercised in the integration test.
Since `package:native_assets_builder` already checks for having no static libraries as output, the custom check in flutter_tools is removed. The tests stubbing out the native assets builder exercising the custom check are also removed. (The integration tests now check for the error message from the native assets builder.)
Reverts: flutter/flutter#154044
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Version does not exist.
Original PR Author: flutter-pub-roller-bot
Reviewed By: {fluttergithubbot}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#152487
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: I forgot that I need to override the compileSdkVersion in the AGP 8.0 [instance of this test](ef9cd32f5a/dev/devicelab/bin/tasks/android_java17_dependency_smoke_tests.dart (L19))
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
Updates `compileSdk`, `targetSdk`, and `ndk` versions (former 2 to latest, latter to the version of the ndk we are hosting on CIPD).
Summary of changes:
- Updates mentioned template values
- `compileSdk` 35 requires AGP 8.0+, so updated to 8.1 in many places.
- This also necessitated Gradle upgrades in most places
- This also necessitated moving the `package` xml attribute to the AGP `namespace` field in a couple places (test + template).
- Some tests use the output of `flutter create` but then use intentionally lower AGP versions. [I downgraded the `compileSdk` in these tests.](fee34fd61a)
- [Stopped lockfile generation](82324a2570) script from hitting the `hello_world` example because it uses `.kts` gradle files.
- One test needed [some Gradle options we had already added to templates](6aa187b4b6).
## Description
This adds `find.backButton()` in the Common Finders to allow finding different types of standard UI elements. It works by attaching a key made from an enum value in a new enum called `StandardComponentType` to all of the standard widgets that perform the associated function.
I also substituted the finder in several places where it is useful in tests.
This allows writing tests that want to find the "back" button without having to know exactly which icon the back button uses under what circumstances. To do it correctly is actually quite complicated, since there are several adaptations that occur (based on platform, and whether it is web or not).
## Tests
- Added tests.
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/152325.
This PR is large due to generate `flutter create --platforms android`. A quick summary:
- Moves the integration test from `packages/flutter_driver/test` to `dev/integration_tests`
- Created a sample Flutter app that draws a blue rectangle
- Forked a subset of `package:flutter_goldens` that will work on the standalone Dart VM
- Forked a subset of `goldens.dart` (from `flutter_test`) to `src/native/goldens.dart` (i.e. `matchesGoldenFile`)
This ... works locally, but as usual I have no idea if it will work on Skia Gold so let's roll some dice.
Turns out just supporting the right value for `kDebugMode` was a lot simpler than I thought. Debug builds used to never go through the build system code path when using `flutter run`, but now that we have wasm this can occur with the run command.
This should address https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/148850
Stop running link hooks in debug mode.
Rationale: link hooks only get access to tree-shaking info in release builds, so they can't do anything meaningful in debug builds. Debug builds should be fast as development cycle, so running less is better.
More details:
* https://github.com/dart-lang/native/issues/1252
Also: rolls packages to latest versions.
## Implementation details
The decision whether linking is enabled is made as follows:
* For normal builds `build_info.dart::BuildMode` is used to determine whether Dart is compiled in JIT or AOT mode.
* Testers always run in JIT, so no linking.
* Native asset dry runs only run for JIT builds (e.g only when hot reload and hot restart are enabled).
## Testing
The integration test is updated to output an asset for linking if `BuildConfig.linkingEnabled` is true, and to output an asset for bundling directly if linking is not enabled.
Relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150808
The original version of the pr [accidentally deleted the back button](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150808#discussion_r1655444210), which didn't block the app building but made the test hang because it couldn't back out of the demo pages.
Repro-ed the failure, and then tested that
```
new_gallery_opengles_impeller__transition_perf
new_gallery__transition_perf
new_gallery_impeller_old_zoom__transition_perf
new_gallery__crane_perf
new_gallery_impeller__transition_perf
```
All pass on my pixel 7 pro, with ` dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t <test>`, after re-adding the mistakenly deleted content.
Did not test on an iOS device (I don't have one), but those tests were failing for the same reason from what I can tell:
```
> reply@study
[2024-06-26 12:49:21.884543] [STDOUT] stdout: [ ] scrolling to demo
[2024-06-26 12:49:22.412479] [STDOUT] stdout: [ +527 ms] tapping demo
[2024-06-26 12:49:28.075978] [STDOUT] stderr: [+5663 ms] VMServiceFlutterDriver: tap message is taking a long time to complete...
```
Which is the same error, and which makes sense - they got stuck because they couldn't back out of the page.
Sorry for the churn ð
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150808
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: Causing the new_gallery tests to hang.
I can repro now though, so should be able to find a fix shortly
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino, johnmccutchan, jtmcdole, jonahwilliams}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Removes the `dual_screen` package from `new_gallery`. Unblocks the fourth attempt to land https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53001.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150733
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: This breaks apps that use plugins that use `compileSdk` 31, some of which we use in our postsubmit (so it blocks the tree).
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {jason-simmons}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Manual engine roll to https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53532, because the roll requires lockfile generation.
Removes these two discontinued plugins from `dev/integration_tests/flutter_gallery`
[`device_info`](https://pub.dev/packages/device_info):
Apparently the video playback doesn't work on iOS simulators (I wasn't able to verify this, as I don't have an iOS simulator installed). I removed the guard against running on those simulators, and replaced with a note in the README.
[`connectivity`](https://pub.dev/packages/connectivity):
This plugin was used to play the bee video from the network. I changed the demo so that the bee video is instead also played from an asset (like its friend the butterfly), and then removed the use of the plugin.
Unblocks the re-land of https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/53462 (itself a reland ð), because of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/150465#issuecomment-2181403712.
Initial tap is missing sometimes; either its never delivered or it is
delivered before gesture controller is hooked up.
1: Update MemoryTest to have option `requiresTapToStart` guarding the
new paths
2: Update the two perf tests that appear to be flaky to output when
TAPPED is received
3: Update the MemoryTest to keep tapping while waiting for TAPPED
Tested on devicelab:
* setting iterations=1
* removing the timeout before READY
* running tests in a while loop
Before this change, you could get the test to hang often. After this
change you'll see "tapping device... [x]" where x is the counter.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/150096
Reverts: flutter/flutter#150287
Initiated by: jtmcdole
Reason for reverting: other memperf tests don't wait for or send a TAPPED; so they fail.
Original PR Author: jtmcdole
Reviewed By: {gaaclarke}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Initial tap is missing sometimes; either its never delivered or it is delivered before gesture controller is hooked up.
1: Update the two perf tests to output when TAPPED is received
2: Update the MemoryTest to keep tapping while waiting for TAPPED
Tested on devicelab:
* setting iterations=1
* removing the timeout before READY
* running tests in a while loop
Before this change, you could get the test to hang often. After this change you'll see "tapping device... [x]" where x is the counter.
Fixes#150096
Initial tap is missing sometimes; either its never delivered or it is delivered before gesture controller is hooked up.
1: Update the two perf tests to output when TAPPED is received
2: Update the MemoryTest to keep tapping while waiting for TAPPED
Tested on devicelab:
* setting iterations=1
* removing the timeout before READY
* running tests in a while loop
Before this change, you could get the test to hang often. After this change you'll see "tapping device... [x]" where x is the counter.
Fixes#150096
Reverts: flutter/flutter#142942
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Seems to have affected iOS platform view focus: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_ios%20native_platform_view_ui_tests_ios/10626/overview
Original PR Author: gspencergoog
Reviewed By: {yjbanov, goderbauer, chunhtai}
This change reverts the following previous change:
## Description
This causes the `Focus` widget to request focus on its focus node if the accessibility system (screen reader) focuses a widget via the `SemanticsAction.focus` action.
## Related Issues
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/83809
## Tests
- Added a test to make sure that focus is requested when `SemanticsAction.focus` is sent by the engine.
## Description
This causes the `Focus` widget to request focus on its focus node if the accessibility system (screen reader) focuses a widget via the `SemanticsAction.focus` action.
## Related Issues
- https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/83809
## Tests
- Added a test to make sure that focus is requested when `SemanticsAction.focus` is sent by the engine.
Manual recreation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/148911
Entire PR is just the output of
```
flutter update-packages --force-upgrade
```
followed by (run from the root of the flutter repo)
```
find . -type d -name 'android' | dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart --no-gradle-generation --no-exclusion
```
This PR adds support invoking `link.dart` hooks.
Link hooks can add new assets. Link hooks can transform assets sent to link hook from build hooks.
This PR does not yet add support for getting tree-shake information in the link hooks. This is pending on defining the `resources.json` format (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/55494).
Issue:
* https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146263
## Implementation considerations
The build hooks could be run before Dart compilation and the link hooks after Dart compilation. (This is how it's done in Dart standalone.) However, due to the way the `Target`s are set up, this would require two targets and serializing and deserializing the `BuildResult` in between these. This would lead to more code but no benefits. Currently there is nothing that mandates running build hooks before Dart compilation.
## Testing
* The unit tests verify that the native_assets_builder `link` and `linkDryRun` would be invoked with help of the existing fake.
* The native assets integration test now also invokes an FFI call of a package that adds the asset during the link hook instead of the build hook.
* In order to keep coverage of the `flutter create --template=package_ffi`, `flutter create` is still run and the extra dependency is added and an extra ffi call is added. (Open to alternative suggestions.)
This test was outputting the "success" string multiple times, which is probably causing the harness to kill the app halfway through its cycle. I suspect this is causing some of the flakiness we've seen of this test. Instead, we should just output the string at the very end of the test, right before the app is done.
