<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169451
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: matanlurey
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Broke a number of post-submit tests
(ios_app_extension, packages_autoroller).
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: mosuem
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {matanlurey}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
Reland after #169357.
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
Switch Flutter to use pub workspaces as a preparation to unpin selected
packages.
Assumptions:
1. No packages in this repository are published to pub.dev --> We can
use `any` dependencies in most local pubspecs, as the global constraint
defines the version. An exception are the packages used outside of this
repo with an `sdk` dependency, namely `flutter_localizations`,
`flutter_test`, and `flutter`.
2. The "universes" `{flutter_tools}` and `{flutter,
flutter_localizations, flutter_goldens}` can use different packages
versions, as they are not resolved together. --> We do not need to
upgrade them in sync, we can first do one "universe", then the other.
Based on these assumptions, we use
https://github.com/mosuem/pubspec_merger.dart to merge all packages in
the `flutter` universe into a top-level pub workspace.
The `flutter` and `flutter_tools` workspaces being separate also ensures
that changes to `flutter` will not inadvertently break `flutter_tools`,
with not-so-nice consequences for our users which would be unable to run
`flutter upgrade`.
There is a third "top-level" pubspec besides `./pubspec.yaml` and
`packages/flutter_tools/pubspec.yaml`, namely
`packages/flutter_tools/.../widget_preview_scaffold/pubspec.yaml`. This
is an artifact due to it living under `flutter_tools`, so it can't be
part of the `./pubspec.yaml` workspace. Moving it would be a larger
change, and out of the scope of this PR.
This required a rewrite of the update-packages tool, but the main
functionality stays the same, as well as the argument names, to ensure a
seamless transition.
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#169276
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: vashworth
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Causing google testing failures
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gaaclarke
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {vashworth}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
In extreme cases, like bespoke test harnesses, the startup logic can be
moved to `-[FlutterViewController awakeFromNib]` in a
FlutterViewController subclass.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/169276/files#diff-dbe39c23a0a380447b90b7559a878dae8564616e0875c4ef0d9e99e02b91adac
## Changes since revert
I changed the init in `//dev/integration_tests/external_textures` from
the UIApplicationDelegate to the FlutterViewController's awakeFromNib.
This is a more appropriate place for initialization post-UISceneDelegate
since it avoids the launch engine altogether. I tried avoiding to make
the big change to prove we could do a small change to migrate that
project. I don't think this big refactor is indicative of what users
will experience. There was a timing assumption in the integration test
that required not using the launch engine at all.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
In extreme cases, like bespoke test harnesses, the startup logic can be
moved to `-[FlutterViewController awakeFromNib]` in a
FlutterViewController subclass.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/169276/files#diff-dbe39c23a0a380447b90b7559a878dae8564616e0875c4ef0d9e99e02b91adac
## Changes since revert
I changed the init in `//dev/integration_tests/external_textures` from
the UIApplicationDelegate to the FlutterViewController's awakeFromNib.
This is a more appropriate place for initialization post-UISceneDelegate
since it avoids the launch engine altogether. I tried avoiding to make
the big change to prove we could do a small change to migrate that
project. I don't think this big refactor is indicative of what users
will experience. There was a timing assumption in the integration test
that required not using the launch engine at all.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#168914
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gaaclarke
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac_ios%20external_ui_integration_test_ios/16792/overview
The external texture integration test is failing. Running the host app
appeared to work but one of the driver asserts isn't working.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gaaclarke
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {vashworth}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
## Changes since revert
Device lab tests have been migrated to using the FlutterPlugin API for
creating platform channels at process launch.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
## **BREAKING CHANGE**
Adopting Apple's UISceneDelegate protocol shifts the initialization
order of apps. For the common cases we've made sure they will work
without change. The one case that will require a change is any app that
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]` assumes that
`UIApplicationDelegate.window.rootViewController` is a
`FlutterViewController` instance. This is sometimes done to register
platform channels directly on the `FlutterViewController`. Instead users
should use the `FlutterPluginRegistry` API's to create platform channels
in `-[UIApplicateDelegate didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`, like
`FlutterPlugin`s do.
An example can be seen here:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168914/files#diff-9f59c5248b58124beca7e290a57646023cda3ca024607092c6c6932606ce16ee
## Changes since revert
Device lab tests have been migrated to using the FlutterPlugin API for
creating platform channels at process launch.
## Description
fixes: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167267
design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZfcQOs-UKRa9jsFG84-MTFeibZTLKCvPQLxF2eskx44/edit?tab=t.0
relands https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/168396
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
Fixes#162107
Commands that were helpful when working on this pr.
`dart dev/tools/bin/generate_gradle_lockfiles.dart
--no-gradle-generation` from flutter/flutter root.
`./gradlew test` from packages/flutter_tools/gradle.
`git add -- ":*.lockfile"` for adding only lockfile changes.
`../../bin/cache/dart-sdk/bin/dart bin/test_runner.dart test -t
android_java11_dependency_smoke_tests` from dev/devicelab
`ktlint --editorconfig=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/.editorconfig
--baseline=dev/bots/test/analyze-test-input/ktlint-baseline.xml
packages/flutter_tools/gradle/src/ --format` formatting kotlin code.
Need ktlint 1.5
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
This auto-formats all *.dart files in the repository outside of the
`engine` subdirectory and enforces that these files stay formatted with
a presubmit check.
**Reviewers:** Please carefully review all the commits except for the
one titled "formatted". The "formatted" commit was auto-generated by
running `dev/tools/format.sh -a -f`. The other commits were hand-crafted
to prepare the repo for the formatting change. I recommend reviewing the
commits one-by-one via the "Commits" tab and avoiding Github's "Files
changed" tab as it will likely slow down your browser because of the
size of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kate Lovett <katelovett@google.com>
Co-authored-by: LongCatIsLooong <31859944+LongCatIsLooong@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- start_original_pr_link -->
Reverts: flutter/flutter#159756
<!-- end_original_pr_link -->
<!-- start_initiating_author -->
Initiated by: gmackall
<!-- end_initiating_author -->
<!-- start_revert_reason -->
Reason for reverting: Made the tree red due to some std out.
<!-- end_revert_reason -->
<!-- start_original_pr_author -->
Original PR Author: gmackall
<!-- end_original_pr_author -->
<!-- start_reviewers -->
Reviewed By: {reidbaker}
<!-- end_reviewers -->
<!-- start_revert_body -->
This change reverts the following previous change:
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
<!-- end_revert_body -->
Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
In preparation for changing engine builds to be unstripped by default
https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/52852, which will allow us to
make progress towards resolving
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/60240.
Tricks AGP in to downloading the NDK when building a flutter app (that
uses the FGP, which to my knowledge is all ways of building flutter
apk/aab/aar).
I want to follow this up by modifying the tool to search for the log
line that the NDK is missing (making it throw an error in that case) as
a safeguard, because that would be the last line of defense before we
accidentally build a bloated app. The safeguard won't work for add to
app, from what I understand, because while they use the FGP (so they
should be forced to be download the NDK) they don't invoke the flutter
tool, and therefore won't invoke the custom error handling of
[`gradle_errors.dart`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/packages/flutter_tools/lib/src/android/gradle_errors.dart)
Some details
1. Respects existing values for `externalNativeBuild.cmake.path` for
apps that actually use it.
2. Silences some warnings that would otherwise appear for add to app
builds or builds that manually invoke gradle:
```
C/C++: CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
C/C++: No project() command is present. The top-level CMakeLists.txt file must
C/C++: contain a literal, direct call to the project() command. Add a line of
C/C++: code such as
C/C++: project(ProjectName)
C/C++: near the top of the file, but after cmake_minimum_required().
C/C++: CMake is pretending there is a "project(Project)" command on the first
C/C++: line.
C/C++: This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
C/C++: CMake Warning:
C/C++: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
C/C++: CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
C/C++: CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
C/C++: CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
```
3. Our ci installs the NDK at an abnormal place that AGP can't find
without help. I've modified all the `build.gradle`s that we have checked
in to point to the pre-installed path. **But some of our tests make a
new app from the templates, and those tests will now start downloading
the NDK** (as they won't be able to find it at it's current path from
templates). We could resolve this by actually fixing
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/136666. This would be a very
significant lift from what I understand - we rely on this hardcoding in
a lot of places in our infra.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/155576
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [ ] All existing and new tests are passing.
If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].
<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Gray Mackall <mackall@google.com>
Reverts: flutter/flutter#157032
Initiated by: gmackall
Reason for reverting: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/157032#issuecomment-2436336078
Original PR Author: gmackall
Reviewed By: {reidbaker, bartekpacia}
This change reverts the following previous change:
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
I recently noticed the following log when building an app in verbose mode:
```
This Android Gradle plugin (8.1.0) was tested up to compileSdk = 33 (and compileSdkPreview = "UpsideDownCakePrivacySandbox").
You are strongly encouraged to update your project to use a newer
Android Gradle plugin that has been tested with compileSdk = 35.
```
It looks like AGP would like us to use a newer AGP version if we want to use compileSdk 35 (which we do). This pr upgrades the tests, in advance of updating the templates.
Reverts: flutter/flutter#156440
Initiated by: zanderso
Reason for reverting: Failing in post submit with
```
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743647] [STDOUT] stdout: [!] CocoaPods could not find compatible versions for pod "Google-Mobile-Ads-SDK":
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743695] [STDOUT] stdout: In Podfile:
[2024-10-08 18:00:22.743718] [STDOUT] stdout: google_mobile_ads (from `.symlinks/plugins/google_mobile_ads/ios`) was resolved t
Original PR Author: flutter-pub-roller-bot
Reviewed By: {fluttergithubbot}
This change reverts the following previous change:
This PR was generated by `flutter update-packages --force-upgrade`.
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
